Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeon Reeves Modified over 9 years ago
1
Recreational WQ Standards and Wastewater Disinfection Jim Davenport Monitoring & Assessment Section Water Quality Planning Division Office of Water Texas Commission on Environmental Quality jdavenpo@tceq.state.tx.usjdavenpo@tceq.state.tx.us tel. 512/239-4585 April 26, 2011
2
Table of Contents for This Presentation ▸ Characteristics of indicator bacteria ▸ Historical linkage of indicators, disinfection ▸ Notes on disinfection requirements ▸ Notes on dechlorination requirements ▸ Development of recreation criteria in U.S. ▸ Recreation criteria in Tx WQ Standards (2010) ▸ Bacteria limits in discharge permits (EPA, TCEQ) ▸ EPA re-evaluation of recreation criteria
3
Waterborne Diseases/Pathogens BacteriaVirusesProtozoa Shigella Enteric viruses Crypto- Salmonella -(gastroenteritis) sporidium E. coli O157:H7Adenovirus:Entamoeba Campylobacter -(colds, etc.)Giardia: Cholera Polio Typhoid:Hepatitis A: Photos: 1 & 3 from primewater.com from 2 from OlarMed.com
4
Indicator Bacteria ▸ E. coli, Fecal coliform, Total coliform, Enterococci, etc. ▸ Surrogate of potential pathogens in water ▸ Ideal characteristics: - Occur at detectable concentrations - Easy to monitor and assess - Well-correlated with actual pathogens - Provide quantifiable risk of disease ▸ Important uses of indicator bacteria: - Indicator of suitability of treated drinking water - Instream criterion for aquatic recreation - Indicator of seafood consumption safety (oysters)
5
Historical Notes on Pathogens/Indicators ▸ 1854 – John Snow documented cholera outbreak from sewage-contaminated well in London ▸ 1856 – William Budd made a similar demonstration for waterborne typhoid ▸ 1883 – Robert Koch microscopically identified bacteria causing cholera & typhoid ▸ 1891 – E. coli tube tests used to indicate fecal origin of typhoid bacteria in Hudson River, NY From Indicators for Waterborne Pathogens, 2004, National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences.
6
Indicators in Early Disinfection Studies Field demonstration of chlorine dosing (“available chlorine”) Side stream from City of Boston trickling filter WWTP From: Earle B. Phelps, 1909, USGS Water Supply Paper 229 Avg. “total bacteria” removal over time at ~ 5 mg/L chlorine: 10 min – 95% 15 min – 99.8% 60 min – 99.9% Initial chlorine mg/LE. coli per mL Monthly meanBefore~ 2 hours% removal 2.5 mg/L (Nov, N=3)41,50072098.3 6.1 mg/L (Apr, N=4)135,300899.9
7
Disinfection Requirements in Texas Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 30, Section 309.3(g) ▸ Chlorine requirements for domestic discharges: - Chlorine residual > 0.5 mg/L - Detention time > 20 minutes - Chlorine (mg/L) X Time (minutes) > 20 - Maximum chlorine < 4 mg/L ▸ Exempt: Stabilization ponds > 21 days retention ▸ Alternative disinfection such as UV is allowed: - If supported by engineering report - Additional monitoring or limits as needed
8
Dechlorination ▸ Advocated by EPA in: Disinfection of wastewater – Task Force Report” MCD-21, EPA-430/9-75-012 1976 ▸ EPA 1984 criteria for total residual chlorine to protect aquatic life: 0.019 mg/L acute: 0.011 mg/L chronic ▸ In 1990, dechlor by two large discharges at Dallas & Fort Worth substantially improved fish in the Trinity River (TPWD, River Studies Report No. 10, 1992) ▸ Dechlor and whole-effluent toxicity testing required in Tx for domestic discharges > 1 MGD since early 1990’s
9
Dechlorination – Revisions ▸ On 6/30/10, TCEQ approved revisions of the Standards Implementation Procedures ▸ Revised procedures are not in effect until approved by EPA, and EPA’s review is still in progress ▸ The revised procedures require dechlor for domestic discharges > 0.5 MGD (1.0 MGD previously) ▸ For discharges > 0.5 to < 1.0 MGD, dechlor is required only for new and amended permits (not renewals) ▸ EPA comment letter on 12/2/10 indicated that dechlor should apply to discharges < 0.5 MGD
10
Bacteria Criteria for Recreation ▸ Fed. criteria for fecal coliform published in 1968: - From U.S. Public Health Service epidemiology studies - 200 FC/100 mL as geometric mean - 400 FC/100 mL for single samples (< 10%) - Already in TCEQ WQ Standards in 1967 ▸ New studies & revised EPA criteria in 1986: - E. coli for freshwater: 126/100 mL geo mean - Enterococci for saltwater: 35/100 mL geo mean - Adopted in TCEQ standards in 2000
11
Revised Recreational Standards (6/30/10) <Previously: Almost all water bodies primary contact <> 300 water bodies not meeting bacteria criteria (2010) <Expand recreational categories <Implement new use-attainability analyses
12
Recreation UsesIndicator Bacteria (#/100 ml) Geometric Mean Criteria Single-sample Max Criteria in Brackets E. coli (FW)Enterococci (SW) Previous Standards: Contact recreation126 [394]35 [89] Noncontact rec.605168 Revised Standards: (Adopted 6/30/2010) Primary contact126 [399]35 [104] Secondary contact 1630175 Secondary contact 21030-- Noncontact rec.2060350
13
Recreational Use-Attainability ▸ Uses other than primary contact may be appropriate for some water bodies ▸ TCEQ has new recreational UAA procedures ▸ Surveys include physical & flow characteristics, + observed evidence of recreation ▸ Local input (interviews) important ▸ Initiated 90 recreational UAAs ▸ Involves major coordination effort and public participation
14
Bacteria Limits in Permits ▸ 1973 – EPA included fecal coliform in performance requirements for domestic wastewater [40 CFR Part 133] ▸ 1976 – EPA deleted these fecal coliform requirements ▸ EPA current reg. requires effluent limits for permits that could “cause or contribute” to WQ impairment – for pollutants of concern [40 CFR Part 122.44] ▸ In 2007, EPA objected to permits to impaired waters – unless bacteria limits included [~24 by Sept 2007] ▸ TCEQ provided documentation for using effluent limits for minimum chlorine residual to regulate disinfection
15
Effluent Bacteria: Houston TMDL Studies
16
TCEQ Effluent Limits for Bacteria ▸ Adopted 11/4/09; Effective 11/26/09 - 30 TAC §§ 309, 319, 210 ▸ Required for domestic discharge permits - §309.3(h) ▸ Effluent limits = most stringent criteria in WQ standards: - Monthly avg limit = geometric mean criterion in stds - Daily max limit = single sample criterion in stds ▸ Sampling frequency of bacteria effluent limits - §319.9 ▸ Bacteria effluent limits for reclaimed water - §210.33
17
EPA Review of Existing Recreation Criteria ▸ EPA is re-evaluating bacteria indicators for coastal waters & Great Lakes; for Federal Beach Act of 2000 ▸ Lawsuit settlement (w/ NRDC, NACWA, LA County): - Requires conducting numerous specific studies - Requires publishing criteria by October 15, 2012; as indicated by new studies ▸ Results could amend EPA’s 1986 recreation criteria ▸ Examples of studies: - Additional epidem. studies (e.g., tropical, marine) - Evaluating alternative indicator organisms - Developing rapid tests for indicators (e.g., DNA)
18
Summary ▸ Bacterial indicators used > 100 years ▸ Current indicators are “imperfect” ▸ TCEQ revised recreation WQ Standards - 6/30/10 ▸ Bacteria effluent limits required as of 11/26/09 ▸ Dechlor for smaller dischargers under EPA review ▸ EPA reviewing recreation criteria – by 10/15/12 ▸ Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.