Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble"— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble
Sarah Beare (nee John) Neill Bowler, Marie Dando, Anette Van der Wal, Rob Darvell © Crown copyright

2 Outline Overview of MOGREPS Configuration
Overview of probabilistic verification Results Summary and future work © Crown copyright

3 MOGREPS-Regional Regional Ensemble
Regional ensemble over N. Atlantic and Europe (NAE) 23 perturbed members + control IC Perturbations from regional ETKF LBC from global ensemble Stochastic physics - random parameters 24km resolution, 38 levels Run at 6Z & 18Z to T+54 Our current suite of operational NWP models are shown here along with future configurations. The numbers refer to typical horizontal grid spacings in mid-latitudes. This grid spacing is often referred to as resolution. © Crown copyright

4 MOGREPS Operational System diagram
New global analysis Global ensemble forecast using stochastic physics LBCs Perturbations mixed and scaled by ETKF New NAE analysis New NAE analysis 0Z 06Z 12Z 18Z © Crown copyright

5 MOGREPS Verification

6 Verification Aim to verify products issued from MOGREPS system
Two systems available Focus on surface parameters and higher thresholds Further results available in verification report recently published on met office website. © Crown copyright

7 Site-specific Verification system
- 79 sites across the UK and Europe. Probabilistic forecast data binned into 10% categories Ability to compare with ECMWF forecasts - Ability to compare RAW model forecasts and post-processed data Can calculate and plot : Reliability diagrams, Empirical ROC Curves, Brier Score and decompositions Brier Skill Score CRPS in the process of being added © Crown copyright

8 Area Based Verification System
Can verify against observations or analyses - Forecast probabilities not binned Can calculate and plot : Reliability and attributes diagrams, Empirical and parametric ROC, Economic value, Brier Score and decompositions Brier Skill Score Spread and Skill based measures Would like to include the RPS, CRPS Can compare Global v Regional ensemble. THORPEX group introducing ECMWF EPS data for comparison purposes (no facility to account for different ensemble sizes). © Crown copyright

9 Performance of ensemble and high-res (12km)
Ensemble mean has lower RMSE than high-res for day 2 forecasts, indicating presence of substantial uncertainties 10m w/s 2m Temp Verification for UK stations for Dec 2006 to Feb T+48 data only available after 6 Feb © Crown copyright

10 Spread-skill relationship – wind speed T+30
Spread-skill for wind-speed binned into equal population bins by spread Skill corrected for observation error Blue – MOGREPS Pink – No Skill Green – Perfect DJF 06/07 JJA 06 © Crown copyright

11 Spread-skill relationship – temperature
Spread-skill for temperature binned into equal population bins by spread Skill corrected for observation error Blue – MOGREPS Pink – No Skill Green – Perfect DJF 06/07 JJA 06 © Crown copyright

12 Temperature

13 Temp DJF06/07 (79 sites UK & Europe)
Temp < 0oC T+36 Temp < -2oC T+36 © Crown copyright

14 Brier Skill Score components - Temperature > 10oC 6 Nov 2006 - 28 Feb 2007
Temp>10C 79 sites UK & Europe 6 Nov 2006 – 28 Feb 2007 Resolution Brier Skill score Reliability © Crown copyright

15 Reliability diagram for surface temperature
Reliability diagram for Temp>10C 79 sites UK & Europe 6 Nov 2006 – 28 Feb 2007 © Crown copyright

16 Temperature > 10oC KFMOS
Kalman-filter bias-corrected forecasts. Resolution Brier Skill score Reliability © Crown copyright

17 Precipitation

18 Brier Skill Score components for Precipitation
12-hour precip>0.5mm 79 sites UK & Europe 1 July 2006 – 31 March 2007 12-hour precip>5mm © Crown copyright

19 Reliability diagram for precipitation
Reliability diagram for 12h precip>5mm 79 sites UK & Europe 1 July 2006 – 31 March 2007 © Crown copyright

20 6hr precip > 0.3mm against gridded analysis
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 6h precip > 0.3mm Verification against Nimrod Analysis over the UK at 1.0 degree resolution. 1st Jan 06 – 28th Feb 07 © Crown copyright

21 6hr precip 5mm against gridded analysis
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 6h precip > 5mm Verification against Nimrod Analysis over the UK at 1.0 degree resolution. 1st Jan 06 – 28th Feb 07 © Crown copyright

22 6hr precip 25mm against gridded analysis
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 6h precip > 25mm Verification against Nimrod Analysis over the UK at 1.0 degree resolution. 1st Jan 06 – 28th Feb 07 © Crown copyright

23 Wind speed

24 Reliability diagram for wind speed
Reliability diagram for wind speed >F5 at T+30 79 sites UK & Europe 6 Nov 2006 – 31 March 2007 © Crown copyright

25 Wind speed at least gale force 8
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 10m Wind > F8 Verification against surface obs over UK and Europe. 1 Jan 06 – 28 Feb 07 © Crown copyright

26 Wind speed at least severe gale force 9
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 10m Wind > F9 Verification against surface obs over UK and Europe. 1 Jan 06 – 28 Feb 07 © Crown copyright

27 Wind speed at least storm force 10
Reliability and sharpness diagram for T+36 forecast. 10m Wind > F10 Verification against surface obs over UK and Europe. 1 Jan 06 – 28 Feb 07 © Crown copyright

28 Summary of verification
Ensemble mean beats control and hi-res from ~18h Very good reliability for non-extreme events Useful skill for some more severe events T<-2C Windspeed > F9 6h Precip > 5mm/12h KFMOS bias correction effective in reducing many biases Better forecasts from NAE than ECMWF, even after KFMOS for some parameters Combination of resolution and perturbation strategy Useful spread-skill in many cases Exception is temperature in summer © Crown copyright

29 Future Plans Fully operational early 2008
SKEB2 scheme including convection for improved stochastic physics Vertical localization of ETKF to improve near-surface perturbation scaling Perturbations to lower boundary (eg soil moisture, SST) Enhanced resolution: Global 60km from 2009 Regional 16km from 2009 and 12 from 2011 Small convection-resolving ensemble from 2011 ~1.5km over UK ~6 members Nested on members selected by clustering © Crown copyright

30 Any Questions? © Crown copyright

31 More Information…. Technical Reports
The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system: Verification report - Trial Performance of MOGREPS January March 2007 N Bowler, M Dando, S Beare and K Mylne (2007) 497 The MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system Part 1: System Description N Bowler, A Arribas, K Mylne and K Robertson, (2007) Comparison of error breeding, singular vectors,random perturbations and ensemble Kalman filter perturbation strategies on a simple model. N Bowler (2004) 452 Results of an initial stochastic physics scheme for the Met Office Unified Model. A. Arribas (2004) © Crown copyright

32 NEW! Regional ETKF Until end of May MOGREPS Perturbations for the NAE were interpolated from the global at T+6 Large scale perturbations Spread too large (especially at upper levels) Since beginning of June perturbations to regional ensemble generated by a regional ETKF. Smaller, more realistic perturbations Better representation of important short length scales But surface perturbations may be too small © Crown copyright

33 Subjective Evaluation of Severe Weather
Forecaster comments/feedback Severe Gale Event – 02/09/06 …. the NAE MOGREPS output clearly captured the strength and gave a good forecast for potential severe gale gusts…. (Paul Davies, Chief Forecaster) Intense rainfall - 20/07/07 … The risk of very high totals is confirmed by NAE MOGREPS members and also other models… (Steve Willington, Chief Forecaster) © Crown copyright


Download ppt "Performance of the MOGREPS Regional Ensemble"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google