1. Hennepin County Public Health Department Minnesota Department of Human Services Minnesota Department of Health

3. SourceAmount Part A$5,285,469 Part B ADAP$5,700,789 Part B Base$1,918,262 State$2,400,000 Rebate$6,018,500 TOTAL$21,232,020

5. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

7. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review *The two Wisconsin counties that are apart of the TGA were not included due to surveillance only looking at Minnesota. Ryan White clients consisted of 8 clients from the two Wisconsin counties.

8. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

9. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

10. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

11. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

12. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

13. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

14. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

15. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

16. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

17. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

18. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

19. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

20. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

21. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

22. Data Source: MN CAREWare and Minnesota HIV/AIDS Surveillance MN CAREWare: Annual Review

23. How Are You Using Data ?

27.  Two Upgrades in 2014  First upgrade done by June 16  Second upgrade in late October/early November  June Upgrade  Biggest change is Annual Review tab  Addition of case manager name  Fall Upgrade  Changes in Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Services Report (RSR) reporting requirements

28.  Mexican, Mexican American, Chicano  Puerto Rican  Cuban  Another Hispanic, Latino/a or Spanish origin

29.  Asian Indian  Chinese  Filipino  Japanese  Korean  Vietnamese  Other Asian

30.  Native Hawaiian  Guamanian or Chamorro  Samoan  Other Pacific Islander

31.  Sex at Birth  Biologic sex assigned to client at birth  Male or Female  HIV Positive Test Date  Confirmatory test with positive result  OAMC Link Date  Client’s first HIV primary care visit after positive HIV test

32.  “Unknown” No Longer Available  Enrollment status  Ethnicity  Housing status  HIV/AIDS status  Health insurance coverage  HIV Risk Factor  “Other” deleted as response option  “Unknown” changed to “Not reported or not identified”

33.  Poverty Level Calculations  Below 100%  100 – 138%  139 – 200%  201 – 250%  251 – 400%  401 – 500%  Greater than 500%

34.  Health Insurance Coverage  Private - Employer  Private - Individual  Medicare  Medicaid, CHIP or other public plan  VA, Tricare and other military health care  Indian Health Services (IHS)  No Insurance/Uninsured  Other plan

35.  Date of Death  Fields Not Being Deleted in MN  First service date  Geographic unit code (zip code)  AIDS diagnosis year

36.  Question about primary language  Question about disability status  All eligible services reported in RSR

37.  Share Limited Surveillance Data for Clients Who Give Consent  HIV diagnosis date  AIDS diagnosis date  HIV status  All CD4 labs (date, type of test, result)  All viral load labs (date, type of test, result)  Note: HIV/AIDS Surveillance System = eHARS (enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System)

38.  More efficient information management :  Case managers won’t have to spend time calling clinics for lab results  Clinic staff won’t have to spend time calling case managers back with lab results  Providers will have easy access to diagnosis dates

39.  Easy availability of CD4 and viral load values will strengthen case managers’ ability to:  Coordinate clients’ HIV medical care  Monitor clients’ health status  Monitor clients’ quality of care

40.  Availability of diagnosis dates, CD4 and VL data will strengthen grantees’ ability to evaluate the following for clients served by Ryan White/state funding:  Linkage to care after diagnosis  Retention in care  Community viral load

41.  Interest at National Level  CDC, HRSA, grantees  CDC developing a program that could be used by any jurisdiction  Hoping to make available for testing in July 2014  Timeline for some of the following steps will depend on CDC

42.  Pilot  4 sites volunteered: Clinic 42, MAP, West Side, YAP  Meet in August to develop messages, explain project  Gather ROIs from MCM clients Sept – Dec 2014  Provide feedback on process early 2015  Import pilot data into CW in early March 2015  All Providers  Meet in December to explain project in more detail  Gather ROIs Jan – March 2015  Provide feedback on process April 2015  Import data into CW in May 2015  Provide feedback on utility of data  Provide feedback as project matures