Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ronnie Belmans Florence, 5 November 2010

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ronnie Belmans Florence, 5 November 2010"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ronnie Belmans Florence, 5 November 2010
Challenges to Climate Policy: Integrating Network Regulation Meshed DC networks for offshore wind development Ronnie Belmans Florence, 5 November 2010 / November-2010

2 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Overview Historical development of HVDC → can we stretch to ‘supergrids’? VSC HVDC Offshore Wind applications Multi-terminal Challenges for offshore Multi-terminal Direct Current (MTDC) systems Technical Economic/financial Political/Sociopolitical Standardization How to connect to AC grid / November-2010 2

3 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Supergrid: Why? Supergrid: Why? Harness RES, crucial role of offshore wind, but also wave, tidal and osmotic energy. Balancing: wind - hydro - natural gas Connect remote energy sources Trading: single market / November-2010 3

4 Planning How will the future grid look like?
Can we manage by stretching the current 380 kV grid to its limits? Or do we need a new overlay grid? “Stretching” was successful for trains Be aware of the “sailing ship syndrome”… We must accept the limits of today’s situation / November-2010 4

5 Planning: How will the future grid look like?
A renewed grid vision? 1956 1948 2008 1974 ? 2020 2050 / November-2010 5

6 Supergrid Visions How will the future DC grid look like?
source: / November-2010 6

7 Supergrid Visions How will the future DC grid look like?
Hydro power Solar power Wind power DC transmission 99LFC0825 Wind 300 GW km sq 5000 x 10 km Hydro 200 GW Cables (Solar) 140 pairs of 5 GW and 3000 km each Solar 700 GW 8000 km sq 90 x 90 km © ABB Group Slide 7 10MP0458 / November-2010 7

8 Supergrid Visions How will the future DC grid look like?
G. Czisch / November-2010 8

9 Supergrid Visions How will the future DC grid look like?
wind-energy-the-facts.org pepei.pennnet.com mainstreamrp.com Statnett wikipedia/desertec Desertec-australia.org Statnett © ABB Group Slide 9 10MP0458 / November-2010 9

10 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
CSC: Classical HVDC Advances in semiconductors led to thyristor valves with many advantages Simplified converter stations Overhauls less frequently needed No risk of mercury poisoning Easy upscaling by stacking thyristors (increased voltage levels) and parallel-connecting thyristor stacks (increasing current rating) Gradual replacement of mercury arc valves to thyristor valves. First replacement 1967: Gotland Today only 1 or 2 HVDC systems with mercury arc valves remain / November-2010 10

11 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Highlights Pinnacle: Itaipu : ±600 kV, 2 x 3150 MW First multi-terminal: 1987 800 kV Shanghai-Xiangjiaba (2011), LCC HVDC world records: Voltage (800 kV) Transmitted power (6400 MW) Distance (2071 km) / November-2010 11

12 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
CSC HVDC Filter requirements result in huge footprint Not viable for offshore application / November-2010 12

13 Multi-terminal Hydro Québec - New England (1992)
Extended to 3-terminal Originally planned: 5-terminal but cancelled (Des Cantons, Comerford) Fixed direction of power / November-2010 13

14 Multi-terminal Mainland Italy-Corsica-Sardinia
1965: monopolar between mainland and Sardinia 1987: converter added in Corsica 1990: mercury arc replaced by thyristors 1992: second pole added / November-2010 14

15 Intermediate Conclusion 1
Footprint too large because of filtering requirements There is no offshore voltage source, needed for commutation General multi-terminal operation not feasible, only ‘pseudo-multi-terminal’ CSC for offshore multi-terminal HVDC is a dead end / November-2010 15

16 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
VSC HVDC Not new development, but entirely new concept based on switches with turn-off capability Characteristics: No voltage source needed to commutate Very fast Very flexible: independent active and reactive power control / November-2010 16

17 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
VSC HVDC First installation: Gotland (yes, again) 1999 50 MW ±80 kV Subsequent installations have ever higher ratings, but ratings CSC remain out of reach / November-2010 17

18 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
State-of-the-art Existing VSC HVDC 350 MW ± 150 kV DC 180 km CSC HVDC 6300 MW ±600 kV DC 785 km km Currently possible CSC HVDC 7200 MW ±800 kV DC 2000 km VSC HVDC 1100 MW ± 320 kV DC / November-2010 18

19 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Construction Less filters → reduced footprint Only cooling equipment and transformers outside Valves pre-assembled / November-2010 19

20 VSC HVDC for offshore applications
Modified design for offshore applications Troll (2005) First offshore HVDC converter 40 MW, 70 km from shore Oil-platform / November-2010 20

21 VSC HVDC for offshore applications
Valhall (2010) 78 MW 292 km Oil-platform / November-2010 21

22 VSC HVDC for offshore applications
Borwin alpha (2010) First offshore HVDC converter for wind power 400 MW 200 km Wind collector / November-2010 22

23 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Borwin alpha AC side with transformers, breakers, and filters AC phase reactors Valves DC side with capacitors and cable connections Cooling equipment / November-2010 23

24 VSC HVDC for wind applications
No cable length issues Wind farms are independent of power system Do not need to run on main frequency Do not need to run on fixed frequency Wind farm topology must be re-evaluated (fixed speed induction machines?) Multiple wind farms can be connected to offshore grids This could lead to a ‘supergrid’ connecting different areas with different wind profiles / November-2010 24

25 Offering Ancillary Services to the Grid
TSO’s Grid Code: “Wind turbines must have a controllable power factor” Grid code country- specific Demands at PCC for 300 MW Minimum PF = 0,95 Required: 98,6 MVAr Capacitive limit Inductive limit / November-2010 25

26 Offering Ancillary Services to the Grid
Additional equipment needed such as SVC, STATCOM,… Compensate AC cable capacitance Be grid compliant Resonances between cable C and grid L / November-2010 26

27 Multi-terminal VSC HVDC
VSC HVDC only developed for point-to-point, but… …looks very promising for MTDC Converter’s DC side has constant voltage → converters can be easily connected to DC network. Extension to ‘pseudo-multi-terminal’ systems straightforward: e.g. star-connections / November-2010 27

28 Intermediate Conclusion 2
Footprint can be made small enough for offshore applications because of limited filtering requirements No offshore voltage source needed Offshore operation is proven for point-to-point connection General multi-terminal operation possible because DC side has constant voltage VSC for offshore multi-terminal HVDC looks promising / November-2010 28

29 Challenges for supergrid
Technical Offshore equipment Ratings Losses Reliability MTDC Control Economic/Financial Political/Sociopolitical Standardization / November-2010 29

30 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Losses Converter losses were very high (> 1.3%) but improvements are made (now 1%) Special switching techniques New materials Cooling Ratings Proven power ratings low compared to CSC HVDC Proven voltage levels low compared to CSC HVDC / November-2010 30

31 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Reliability DC Fault leads to complete shutdown To protect IGBTs from fault current, they are blocked Anti-parallel diodes keep conducting the fault current No DC breakers are present The fault needs to be cleared by opening AC breakers For MTDC, a DC fault would lead to loss of whole MTDC grid. This is not acceptable. The fault needs to be cleared selectively at DC side. Problem DC breaker not commercially available yet, but should come out of the laboratories soon Current rises extremely fast Very fast fault detection needed Very fast and precise fault localisation needed Very fast breaker needed / November-2010 31

32 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Reliability DC voltage needs to remain within small band Problem: If only one converter controls DC voltage, DC voltage can become unacceptably low in MTDC grid What if voltage controlling converter fails? Other voltage control method needed. Which one? Grid codes will be needed / November-2010 32

33 Technical challenges by auxiliary equipment and maintenance
Pumps, fans, cooling in harsh and remote environment (also valid for windturbine itself) Maintenance Training and availability of personnel Accessability in winter / November-2010 33

34 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Economical/Financial issues Different generation and load scenarios Cost/benefit of scenarios Electricity prices Financial demand per scenario Financing by not directly involved TSO’s Realization and ownership of the Supergrid European funding Potential investors Source: ENTSO-E, “Ten-year network development plan ” / November-2010 34

35 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Political/Sociopolitical issues Legal and regulatory framework Social acceptance of the Supergrid Permitting processes, harmonization of national rules European policy on DSM New areas to be incorporated: Russia, Norway,… Political stability of regions Start up of regulation now for the starting projects for which technology is ready to go: Point to point Star connected (Kriegers Flak, Channel area, Dogger Bank) Source: ENTSO-E, “Ten-year network development plan ” / November-2010 35

36 Challenges Standardization
General justification for standards Reducing variety of technology  competition Interoperability  avoid lock-in For HVDC Competition? Several manufacturers/vendors in the market  Fairly OK Interoperability? Not at all!  Need for standards / November-2010 36

37 Challenges Standardization
Interoperability: in a context of meshed DC grids very important Today different systems are incompatible / November-2010 37

38 Challenges Standardization
What should be standardized? Minimum minimorum to allow integration in a DC grid Voltage levels Necessary to avoid excessive integration costs Cable sizes Footprints Cubicle sizes Voltage control Optimal interoperability Power electronics Filters Short circuit current Protection Communication EMF-EMC / November-2010 38

39 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Challenges Other Technical compatibility Common, long term vision Planning / November-2010 39

40 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Connection to AC grid Connection to AC grid Close to shore Reinforcement AC grid needed OHL AC Underground AC cable To strong, inland AC bus Overhead DC Underground DC / November-2010 40

41 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Example: Borwin 128 km DC sea cable 75 km DC land cable (less expensive) / November-2010 41

42 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Example: Borwin / November-2010 42

43 ronnie.belmans@esat.kuleuven.be / November-2010
Conclusions CSC HVDC Stretching not possible Too large Grid voltage needed VSC HVDC Stretching possible Small footprint Passive grid operation Technical characteristics suited to wind applications Offshore applications proven Technical challenges remain… DC breaker Fast fault detection and localisation Losses Ratings DC voltage control …but can be solved Need to further look into economic and political challenges Standardization required / November-2010 43


Download ppt "Ronnie Belmans Florence, 5 November 2010"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google