Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTobias Moore Modified over 9 years ago
1
Dow Fire and Explosion Index (FEI) Dick Hawrelak Presented to ES317Y in 2001 at UWO
2
Introduction V1.0 was first Issued in 1964 By Bill Braise (RIP). V7.0 was last issued in 1994 and is now marketed by the AIChE ($50/copy). n FEI is widely used outside of Dow. n FEI is the leading hazard index methodology recognized by the chemical industry. n V7.0 is available on my CD in Folder (9) as Dow FEI V1.3.
3
What is the Dow FEI? n The Dow FEI is a ranking system that gives a relative index to the risk of individual process units due to potential fires and explosions.
4
What is the Primary Purpose of the Dow FEI? n It serves as a guide for the selection of fire and explosion protection methods. n It assists in determining the spacing between adjacent process units within the ISBL. n It is a guide for insurance agencies to set insurance rates. n It ranks individual process units where special safety attention can be focused.
5
When should one perform an FEI? n Late in Phase III Engineering after: u P&IDs have been completed, u Equipment has been sized, u A trial equipment layout has been done, u A DFC estimate has been completed.
6
Who Usually Performs the FEI? n Generally a senior process engineer, who is acquainted with the details of the project, is assigned the task. n Occasionally, different groups tackle the assignment and results are compared for consensus building.
7
What Does the FEI Consider? n Six general process hazards. n Twelve special process hazards. n Nine process control credit factors. n Four material isolation credit factors. n Nine fire protection credit factors.
8
General Process Hazards n Exothermic reactions. n Endothermic processes. n Material handling and transfer n Enclosed or indoor process units. n Access. n Drainage and spill control.
9
Special Process Hazards n Toxic materials. n Sub-atmospheric pressure (<500 mmHg). n Operating in or near flammable range. u Tank farm storage flammable liquids. u Process upset or purge failure. u Always in flammable range. n Dust explosion. n Pressure.
10
Special Hazards Cont’d n Low temperature. n Quantity of flammable/unstable material. u Liquids or gases in process. u Liquids or gases in storage. u Combustible solids in storage. n Corrosion and erosion.
11
Special Hazards Cont’d n Leakage – joints and packing. n Use of fired equipment. n Hot oil heat exchanger system. n Rotating equipment.
12
Process Control Credit Factors n Emergency power. n Cooling. n Explosion control. n Emergency shutdown. n Computer control.
13
Process Control Factors Cont’d n Inert gas. n Operating instruction procedures. n Reactive chemical review. n Process hazard analysis.
14
Material isolation Credit Factors n Remote control valves. n Dump or blow down control. n Drainage. n Interlocks.
15
Fire Protection Credit Factors n Leak detection. n Structural steel. n Fire water supply. n Special systems. n Sprinkler systems. n Water curtains. n Foam. n Hand extinguishers. n Cable protection.
16
FEI Example
17
General Process Hazards
18
Special Process Hazards
19
Fig 8: Damage Factor
20
Process Control Credit Factors
21
Material Isolation Factors
22
Fire Protection Credit Factors
23
Credit Factor Summary n Process Control, C1 =0.75 n Material isolation, C2 = 0.88 n Fire Protection, C3 = 0.79 n C1xC2xC3 = (0.75)(0.88)(0.79) = 0.52
24
Process Unit Risk Analysis Summary
25
Plot Plan Summary
26
Features Not Used In V7.0
27
Limitations of Dow FEI n No scientific basis for many of the features can be found in Dow records. Fig 8 is an example. (RAH study – 1993). n Does not correlate well with known plant disasters (Flixborough, Phillips, Norco). n While explosion damage is fairly advanced (Flixborough – 1974), fire damage alone is more difficult to predict. n Not scenario driven as in recent QRA work in Holland and the U.K.
28
Recent Trends n Insurance companies are looking at Maximum Foreseeable Loss, (MFL), based on Baker‘s- 1994 blast technology for Detonations and Deflagrations as applied to plant equipment layout. n There is a trend toward higher insurance premiums as insurance companies adjust their actuarial data. n Many chemical companies may follow Exxon’s trend to insure themselves.
29
End Of Show n Your Department should have a copy of the 7 th Edition available for further examination and application to your projects.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.