Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University of Missouri Julia LePage and Terri Rodgers Missouri DDD Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas

2 Purpose of Presentation Share the evolution of Schoolwide PBS (SW-PBS) in Missouri Describe how the statewide PBIS team collaborated with professionals in mental health and developmental disabilities to – Form a statewide interagency planning process – Leverage limited funds for PBS across agencies Describe the tiered implementation training beginning in the MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD)

3 MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools 1999 Training Format The Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) local improvement grants (LIGs) are awarded to districts to attend trainings throughout the year and during summer institutes. Staff from the University of Missouri PBS Center provides the trainers for these activities. History of MO SW-PBS

4 MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools 19992006 DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools MO SW-PBS 2006 - Present Training Format 22 Consultants in 9 regions, 5 Tier 2/3 consultants, state data/web consultant, state coordinator and MU PBS personnel provide training/technical assistance on standardized curriculum for multiple levels and stakeholders

5 Implement Universals Identify Students Describe Problem Identify Function Select & Provide Intervention Evaluate Outcomes Collect & Review Data BAT – A BAT – C, D, E BAT – F, G Revised 10/12/2011

6 Current Statistics 2011-12 700 schools representing 202 districts are active participants – This is 29% of Missouri schools and 36% of Missouri districts Support from MO Department of Elementary & Secondary Education Dr. Tim Lewis, an MU professor and co-director of the OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, continues to be instrumental in providing ongoing technical assistance and guidance to the Missouri SW-PBS initiative.

7 Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Collaboration

8 Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery No system to inform schools that other agencies are working with the child and family Agencies and schools do not work together to develop one plan with the child and family Often agency people feel that they are asked to take sides – parents vs. the school School personnel spending 60 - 120 minutes during meetings focusing only on the problems

9 Challenges of Disconnected System of Service Delivery (Continued…) Parents not sharing what it is like at home Schools expecting parents to do it all - telling them what to do instead of collaborating around goals and dreams for child “Too many words” or with “too much Jargon” because so many different systems are working to provide services to the child and family

10 Interagency Collaboration Started in 2008 Agencies included: – Missouri SW-PBS – Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Office of Quality Schools Office of Special Education Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled – Department of Mental Health Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Comprehensive Psychiatric Services

11 Leadership Team Funding Visibility Policy/P olitical Support TrainingCoachingEvaluation Active Coordination Local School Teams/Demonstrations State-wide Model for SWPBS Tier 3 Interagency System Behavioral Expertise Adapted From: Placed Policy With Political Support and Added Tier 3 Interagency Systems

12 Interagency Planning Team State Team District Team School Planning Team Add a Statewide Problem-solving System to Encourage Interagency Use of PBS Funds

13 Key Issues Related to Sustainability of Interagency Collaboration Goal was to avoid common problems associated with interagency meetings and to follow key elements of sustainability & systems change: Promote priority for a specific practice Maximize contextual fit Ensure efficacy of practices Use data for continuous generation Avoid over reliance on any one individual

14 Important Expectations for the Team The outcomes of the team process must address each agency’s agenda No group slowed down their own progress to wait for another group to “catch up”; instead, every agency proceeded with tasks at their own pace Goal was to remain aware of what was happening with training and technical assistance across agencies at all times

15 First Steps: Assessment and Brainstorming

16 MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools 19992006 DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools 2008 DMH CPSDDD Interagency Collaboration – First Steps

17 Initial Goals of the Team Work between agencies at the state level and information gleaned from working with schools and human service agencies across the state resulted in the identification of the following goals: Develop a Common Language Develop a Common Vision Develop a Common Training

18 Develop a Common Vision What can we start doing? Focus on quality of life ‒Start the conversation with the goal, not the problem. All schools and human service agencies must work with families to focus first on prevention – not on reaction

19 Develop Common Vision Improve quality of life across the lifespan Foster interagency collaboration Support delivery of evidence-based, outcome- focused, person-centered services and supports Share training resources Increase professionals’ skills in implementing positive behavior support and person-centered planning Leverage limited state funds

20 Develop a Common Language Identify terms we need to understand to facilitate collaborative work with children and families. ‒Glossary of terms developed that will be used by schools and human service agencies in Missouri Establish ongoing communication between families, agencies and families

21 Develop a Common Language Glossary of terms developed that will be used by schools and human service agencies in MO Person-Centered Planning – Schools do not commonly use the term, Person- Centered Planning. Yet, the Person-Centered Plan is the starting point for provision of services through the Division of Developmental Disabilities and Comprehensive Psychiatric Services Quality of Life

22 Develop a Common Language Establish ongoing communication between families, agencies and schools Schools and agencies identify one person within each system to act as the contact. Add the following to school enrollment forms: “List other agencies currently working with your child”

23 Develop a Common Training System & Curriculum While MO SW-PBS was designing curriculum and training to develop Tier 2 system of support, collaboration with other state agencies was initiated to prepare for design of Tier 3 system of support. Common language incorporated in MO SW- PBS and Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tier 3 curricula

24 Develop a Common Training System & Curriculum Shared Training Opportunities - what do we need to do to make this happen? DDD is developing training systems that are modeled after systems developed by MO SW- PBS. – DDD provides training for Behavior Resource Team members during Monthly Meetings Behavior Resource Team members attend the trainings provided to schools by MO SW- PBS consultants. Schools and human service agencies will send information to one another about upcoming trainings.

25 The Assessment Resulted in the Following It was common for professionals to know about the interagency teams that were occurring within their own agency However, professionals in other agencies were not always aware of these interagency meetings The PBS team was curious about the extent to which interagency teams at the local and regional level “overlap” How do these teams relate to the SWPBS efforts (RPDCs) and to the BRT supports across the state

26 Location of RPDCs (SW-PBS Regional Trainers)

27 Systems of Care Interagency Meetings

28 Juvenile Justice Meetings

29 Community Transition Teams (for Students with Developmental Disabilities)

30 Assessing Overlap of Teams

31 Defining the Types of Training Needed

32 Four Levels of Integrated Training 1.Awareness Training in PBS 2.Training for Professionals in PBS (inservice) 3.Training Facilitators to lead teams 4.Training Experienced leaders who will provide training in areas 1-3

33 Layers of Training Are Needed for Different Prevention Tiers Tier 1/Universal Interventions/Primary Prevention (Example: Training for teams in systems to create positive environments, teach communication and social skills, and collect data and intervene early) Tier 2/Secondary Prevention/Specialized (Example: Trainings for teams to use data for early identification of problem behavior and implementation of interventions that will support groups of individuals) Tier 3 or Tertiary Prevention (Example: Trainings for teams to create systems that address chronic and severe problem behavior)

34 Four Levels of Integrated Training 1.Awareness Training in PBS – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 2.Training for Professionals in PBS (Preservice/inservice) – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 3.Training Facilitators to lead teams – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3 4.Training Experienced leaders who will provide training in areas 1-3 – Tier 1 – Tier 2 – Tier 3

35 MU SW-PBS Trainers Schools 19992006 DESE MO SW-PBS Trainers in Regional Centers Schools 2011 DMH CPSDDD Interagency Collaboration Community Mental Health Community Support Specialists RO BRT SB40 Transition Coordinators

36 First MO Interagency Task Orders Create Tertiary Level PBS Curriculum That Can Be Used Across Education, Human Services and Other Agencies Expand and Encourage Interagency Collaboration at State, Regional, and Local Levels Establish State Level Data-based Decision Making to Evaluate Impact of PBS in Missouri Ensure that Universities and Colleges Across Missouri Know About the Interagency Team and Can Access the PBS Curriculum

37 Two Regional Interagency Pilots Awareness training in PBS for District team, Agencies in DD, Mental Health, Families, etc School-wide PBS tools to assist districts created and embedded within the statewide training system (this is created with the team but embedded in the SWPBS training systems) Assistance in helping regional teams create strategies that will improve PBS planning for individual students within regions – Training – Service Coordination – Communication – Etc.

38

39 Additional First MO Interagency Task Orders Create 2 Glossy Brochures About the Interagency Efforts for Dissemination Gather information from Local, Regional, and Statewide Professionals to Guide Implementation Modify a District tier 2 & 3 self assessment checklist that includes interagency planning in addition to other district-level considerations

40 First MO Interagency Task Orders (Continued) Expand Tiered Training Systems in Developmental Disabilities – Medicaid Reimbursement for Organizations to Implement Tiers 1 & 2 – Tier 3 Can Only Be Facilitated by BCBA Certified Professionals) – Create a Training System Similar to Statewide PBIS

41 Products and Outcomes Logic model, draft task orders, and mission statement Modification of a district self assessment and implementation planning checklist for tiers 2 & 3 that includes interagency collaboration Team member audit of a tier 3 interagency training system in Kansas using online modules, onsite classes, mentoring observations, and intervention fidelity

42 Products and Outcomes (Continued) Policy document --how PBS can be implemented from a tiered perspective within the DD system Development of a tool similar to the Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET) – Agency Systems Supports Evaluation Tool (ASSET) Software program designed – “Big Seven” for Agencies – To provide data-based decision making in general using Incident Reports

43 Products and Outcomes (Continued) Human subjects design outlining a plan for disseminating a qualitative study of interagency collaboration in MO First glossy brochure describing the purpose of the Missouri Interagency Statewide Team Training materials created for regional team (ie. Kirksville awareness PBS materials), meeting minutes, and perceptions of individuals participating in process thus far

44 Products and Outcomes (Continued) State interagency professionals visited two state schools implementing SW-PBS; during this visit information was gathered about how to begin structuring interviews, focus groups, and tool development

45 Working Smarter Not Harder Using Already Existing Developmental Disability Resources to Establish Data, Systems, and Practices for Preventing Problem Behavior and Increasing Quality of LIfe

46 Development of Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Supports Systems 1:1 crisis behavior management ineffective and expensive-”focus on putting out fires” System wide approach necessary for effectiveness and best use of resources – Modeling after Mo-SW state level systems- “not re- inventing the wheel” – Person Centered Process – focus on QOL – To implement must have training, coaching, mentoring and system support

47 Mo SW Model Regional Consultants - Unit of Implementation = School Building - System of Recognition (Bronze, Silver Gold) - Training designed for implementation phases - SET -ODR -Big ‘5’ School Team to design implementation of school wide Tier 1 and 2 strategies Mo DDD Tiered Supports Model Regional Behavior Resource Team Members - Unit of implementation = Agency or Family - System of Recognition of implementation -Trainings to be designed for Implementation phases -ASSET -EMT (incident reports) -Big ‘7’ Agency/Family team – design and implement systemic Universal Strategies Systems Data Practices

48 Missouri Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Support Work Structure Regional Behavior Analyst Behavior Resource Lead or Supervisor Team Member Family 1-Decision Maker and Caretakers Agency 1 Implementation Team and Coach Agency 2 Implementation Team and Coach Team Member Agency 3 Implementation Team and Coach Agency 4 Implementation Team and Coach Family 2-Decision Maker and Caretakers

49 MO Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) Tiered Supports Practices include: 3) Intensive individualized behavior supports- to be developed and implemented by licensed professionals. 2) Specialized strategies for common problem situations; and 1) Universal strategies-proactive, preventative, positive teaching based strategies for staff and families to use

50 Other System Modifications That Support Implementation Licensure required for practice of Applied Behavior Analysis (with exemption for IDEA) Medicaid Waiver services to fund additional assistance with implementation of model – Behavior Analysis services – for development of Intensive Individualized supports – Person Centered Strategies Consultation - to develop, around an individual, implementation of universal strategies that improve quality of life

51 MO DDD Expected Outcomes Development and implementation of universal strategies will: – Advance quality of life outcomes – Improve processes and practices – Support communication and consistency for all individuals (those served and those supporting) – Reduce occurrences and severity of crisis situations

52 Missouri Division of Developmental Disabilities Tiered Supports Model What? Applied Behavior Analysis What? Focused teaching strategies What? Proactive, preventive, positive & teaching based strategies for staff and families to use consistently and continuously

53 Additional Example of Interagency PBS Awareness Brochure


Download ppt "Missouri’s Interagency Statewide Planning Team: Improving Quality of Life for Individuals Across the Lifespan Terry Bigby and Diane Feeley Missouri SWPBS/University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google