Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

May 2 & 3, 2005 Stafford II, Room 555 National Science Foundation PROJECT DIRECTORS & PROJECT ADMINISTRATORS MEETING.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "May 2 & 3, 2005 Stafford II, Room 555 National Science Foundation PROJECT DIRECTORS & PROJECT ADMINISTRATORS MEETING."— Presentation transcript:

1 May 2 & 3, 2005 Stafford II, Room 555 National Science Foundation PROJECT DIRECTORS & PROJECT ADMINISTRATORS MEETING

2  Sherry Farwell– Office Head  Pat Ferguson– Senior Program Assistant  Simona Gilbert – Administrative Manager  Julio Lopez-Ferrao– Program Director  B. Jane Harrington– Program Director  Martha James– Program Director  Karen Sandberg – Program Director  Sheila Tyndell – Program Specialist  George Rubottom – Senior Program Advisor EPSCoR STAFF

3 AGENDA FOR NSF EPSCoR PD/PA MEETING May 2, 2005 Welcome and Introductions (8:30-8:45 am) – Farwell Agency and Office Updates (8:45-9:30 am) – Farwell FY-06 Budget & Other Office News Mission/Goals/Objectives Future Directions FY-05 RII Solicitation Strength-Based Research Collaboratives (SBRC) Discussion (9:30-10:00 am) Break (10:00-10:15 am)

4 AGENDA FOR NSF EPSCoR PD/PA MEETING CONT’D May 2, 2005 Updates Continued Co-Funding (10:15-10:30 am) – Rubottom/Harrington Outreach (10:30-10:45 am) – Gilbert/Tyndell Update on National Conference Plan (10:45-11:15 am) – James/Gomez Update on Communication Plan (11:15-12:00 pm) – Sandberg/Suplee Lunch (12:00-1:00 pm)

5 AGENDA FOR NSF EPSCoR PD/PA MEETING CONT’D May 2, 2005 Workshop on Evaluation Metrics (1:00-5:00 pm) – Farwell/Lopez-Ferrao Co-Facilitators: B. Crangle, N. Webb, & T. Taylor May 3, 2005 Preparation of Workshop Recommendations (8:30-10:30 am) Break (10:30-10:45 am) Report-Out on Workshop Recommendations (10:45-11:45 am) Wrap-Up Remarks/Adjourn (11:45-12:00 pm) – Farwell

6 “People seem to pay more attention to you when you are up to something.” Calvin & Hobbes CALVIN & EPSCoR

7 EPSCoR OFFICE NEWS  Moved to New Office Suite in Rm #1122  Completing FY-05 RII Award Recommendations  New RII Solicitation in NSF Clearance Process  Participating in EHR AC during May 12/13  Planning for EPSCoR COV on July 26/27  Planning for National Conference on Sept 25-28  Working with EICC Members  Conducting/Planning Jurisdiction Visits  Participating in Related NSF Activities

8 FY’98 FY’99 FY’00 FY’01 FY’02 FY’03 FY’04 FY’05 FY’06 Millions of dollars Total Growth FY 98 – FY 05: $2.15 billion (68%) (Request) APPROPRIATIONS FOR NSF FY 1998 - 2005 8000 6000 4000 2000 $5,605

9 NSF FUNDING BY ACCOUNT (Dollars in Millions)

10 EPSCoR FUNDING (Dollars in Millions) FY-04 Actual FY-05 Actual FY-06 Request Change Over FY-05 $94.44$93.68$94.00+$0.32

11 “The Best Way To Predict The Future Is To Create It.” Peter Drucker LESSON

12 EPSCoR MISSION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES MISSION To Assist the National Science Foundation in its Statutory Function “To Strengthen Research and Education in Science & Engineering Throughout the United States and to Avoid Undue Concentration of Such Research and Education GOALS  To Provide Strategic Programs and Opportunities for EPSCoR Participants That Stimulate Sustainable Improvements in Their R&D Capacity and Competitiveness  To Advance Science & Engineering Capabilities in EPSCoR Jurisdictions for Discovery, Innovation, and Overall Knowledge-Based Prosperity

13 EPSCoR MISSION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES CONT’D OBJECTIVES  To Catalyze Key Research Themes and Related Activities Within EPSCoR jurisdictions that Empower Knowledge Generation, Dissemination, and Application  To Activate Effective Jurisdictional and Regional Collaborations among Academic, Government, and Private Sector Stakeholders that Advance Scientific Research, Promote Innovation, and Provide Multiple Societal Benefits  To Broaden Participation in Science & Engineering by Institutions, Organizations, and People within EPSCoR Jurisdictions  To Use EPSCoR for Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of Future Programmatic Experiments that Motivate Positive Change and Progression

14 “Even If You Are On The Right Track, You’ll Get Run Over If You Just Sit There.” Will Rogers INNOVATION & EPSCoR

15 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CONSTANTS” General Purpose: Catalyze Sustainable Improvements General Mechanism: Investments Human/Physical Infrastructure General Proposal Requirements  Link Proposed Infrastructure Investment to Focused S&T Plan for Greater R&D Capability & Competitiveness  Note Strategy for Integration of Research, Education, Innovation and Outreach  Define Management Team, Plan, and Process  Outline Partnership & Sustainability Plans  Describe Plans for Broadening Opportunities & Participation

16 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CONSTANTS”, CONT’D General Review Criteria  Intellectual Merit, Broader Impacts  Integration R&E, Diversity  Strategic Fidelity, Value Added, Management, Sustainability, and Outreach General Awards & Requirements  Same Funding Range and Duration  Same Reporting Schedule and Conditions General Office  Same PD as Points-of-Contact  Same Head  Same Management Concept and Goal  Same Requirements for Workplan, Financial, and Communication Management

17 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CHANGES” Technical Mechanics  Dates of May 16 (est.) & Sept. 16  No Cost Share Requirement  Expanded Project Description Section  < 25 Pages  Results From Prior NSF Support  Science, Education, Innovation, and Outreach Plans  Project Management/Coordination Plan  Evaluation Plan  Communication Plan  Sustainability Plan

18 NEW WORDING Although no cost-sharing funds are required for these proposals, clear evidence of the jurisdiction's commitment must be included with the proposal. The level of commitment will differ among applicants because of the variability of resources available among jurisdictions. At a minimum, a letter of support from a senior official (e.g., institutional Chief Financial Officer or institutional Vice President for Research) should outline the commitment of resources and facilities to sustain and support the project throughout the period of funding, and to maintain these resources beyond the period of support. Such evidence of jurisdictional and/or institutional support should be submitted as supplementary documents in the FastLane proposal.

19 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CHANGES” Technical Mechanics  Dates of May 16 (est.) & Sept. 16  No Cost Share Requirement  Expanded Project Description Section  < 25 Pages  Results From Prior NSF Support  Science, Education, Innovation, and Outreach Plans  Project Management/Coordination Plan  Evaluation Plan  Communication Plan  Sustainability Plan

20 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CHANGES”, CONT’D Technical Mechanics cont’d  No Concurrent RII Awards  Jurisdictions Eligible to Compete in RII Competition Closest to Expiration Date of Current Award  Additional Review Criteria  Comprehensive Evaluation Plan With Described Metrics, Data Capture/Processing/Interpretation/Use and Reporting of Outputs & Outcomes  Dissemination and Communication Processes with Defined Networks, Audiences, Partners, Schedules, etc.

21 “The Art Of Leadership Is To Align The System’s Strengths And Thereby Make The System’s Weaknesses Irrelevant.” Peter Drucker A THOUGHT-PROVOKING QUOTE

22 PROPOSED STRENGTH-BASED RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE (SBRC) PROGRAM  SBRC Characteristics  Concentrated on Scientific Theme of Regional Relevance & National Importance  Utilizes Entire Gamut of Jurisdiction’s Talent & Infrastructure for Thematic Research  Expands Talent & Infrastructure Base Via Intra/Inter-Jurisdiction Partnerships  Uses Cyber-Infrastructure & ACCESS-GRID  Integrates R&E and Diversity  “Graduates” Because of Defined Duration for EPSCoR Funding

23 NEW RII PROGRAM SOLICITATION THE “CHANGES” CONT’D Conceptual Strategies Cont’d  Pending RII Solicitation  Targets Infrastructure Improvement for Building Competitive R&D Strength & Collaborations for Corresponding Potential SBRC  RII Focused on a General Research Theme  Close Integration of Research Focus with Corresponding Education, Innovation & Outreach Plans  EPSCoR Funds Requested and Used Only For EPSCoR Project Components and Participants

24 EPSCoR AT NSF CHARTING THE TRAJECTORY TOWARD SUSTAINABLE SCIENTIFIC SUCCESS (TS 3 ) SBRC/RII & Co-Funding/Outreach National Competitiveness FY-2007 RII FY-2001 Initial Infrastructure FY-1992 Research Clusters FY-1985 Individual PI S&T Projects FY-1980 EPSCoR Program Evolution Co-Funding/Outreach FY-1998

25 “What’s The Point Of Trying If You Can’t Be A Winner.” Calvin & Hobbes CALVIN & EPSCoR COMPETITIVENESS

26 POSITIVE TRANSFORMATION Focus Collaboration Strength

27 “Keep Things Informal. Talking And Listening Are The Natural Ways To Do Business. Writing Is Great For Keeping Records & Details, But Discussion Generates Ideas, Understanding & Partners.” T. Boone Pickens EPSCOR MEETINGS

28

29 CO-FUNDING

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43 OUTREACH

44

45 May 2, 2005

46

47

48 “It’s Tough To Make Predictions, Especially About The Future.” Yogi Berra EVALUATION WORKSHOP

49 Realistic Expectations Collaborative Effort Facilitators  Provide Discussion Framework  Help Condense and Organize  Small Working Groups  Rooms 535, 545, & 555 Let The Fun Begin!! EVALUATION WORKSHOP

50 Toward More Effective Communications (attached Word file)

51 “You Should Give 100% In The First Half Of The Game, And If That Isn’t Enough, In The Second Half You Give What’s Left.” Yogi Berra “It Ain’t Over Till It’s Over” Yogi Berra EPSCOR PD/PA MEETING: 2 QUOTES FOR DAY 2

52 NSF EPSCoR PD/PA MEETING: DAY 2 Wrap-up Acknowledgements Adjourn


Download ppt "May 2 & 3, 2005 Stafford II, Room 555 National Science Foundation PROJECT DIRECTORS & PROJECT ADMINISTRATORS MEETING."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google