Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLucas Carson Modified over 9 years ago
1
steve_raney@cities21.org Stanford Research Park Commute Map Steve Raney, Pitman Avenue, Cities21.org, U.C. Berkeley Transportation Planning Transportation Research Board Jan. ’03 paper Thanks –Joe Kott, Amanda Jones, Dave Matson - GIS Mgr –Chris Augenstein – VTA, Mike Skowroneck, MTC –Prof. Robert Cervero & John Landis, Berkeley Funding –Cities21 –Palo Alto staff time + map printing
2
steve_raney@cities21.org Outline Why? Methodology Results
3
steve_raney@cities21.org Why? “Because of the upcoming Highway 101 Corridor Study, planned Caltrain Baby Bullet service, Stanford General Use Permit trip reductions, and ongoing VTA/SamTrans bus route planning, Palo Alto needed more accurate and more current commute data than other cities and transit agencies. Compared to recent regional transportation studies, our data is twenty times more precise and our participation rates are much higher.” –Joe Kott, City of Palo Alto Chief Transportation Officer.
4
steve_raney@cities21.org Why? - Transit Route Planning VTA ’99 Major Emp. Center Zip Code Study –5 new routes (1,000 riders), modified 50% of commute routes, new park & ride lots, marketing for specific routes How many people within X feet of a bus stop? NJIT mathematical bus optimization algorithm TALC: “There is no existing means to effectively match new bus service with worker’s travel patterns. Transit agencies are forced to predict where commuters need to go, instead of being able to use actual data.”
5
steve_raney@cities21.org Privacy-Protecting Data Collection Employer creates employee address spreadsheet (15 minutes processing max): Under employer supervision, addresses are aggregated to 1/5 mile grid. Multiple employers. Privacy is protected: 1/5 mile grid: 4 blocks or 144 houses.
6
steve_raney@cities21.org Methodology U.C. Berkeley grad student study –Endorsed by PA Transportation Dept. –Privacy validated by PA GIS 161 companies, 20 largest, 20K emps Mid-peninsula Commute Forum kickoff PA Trans letter (“patriotic” appeal) 25 contacts per company - limited escalation On-site geocoding 280 hours (<100 hr improvement exists)
7
steve_raney@cities21.org Worst possible timing 13/20 participated => 8,200 addresses 7 declines (details withheld): Methodology - (2)
8
steve_raney@cities21.org Results: 47% CalTrain 49% 10 mi 15 min HOV.
9
steve_raney@cities21.org Proactive Ridesharing Marketing Oil shock scenario Improve marketing targeting Questions? EmployeesEmployerPA/VTA EmployerEmployeesPA/VTA Addresses1/5 Mile Grid RequestZip code Identify promising neighborhoods
10
steve_raney@cities21.org National Implementation Edge cities - 181 > Memphis in last 25 yrs –Decentralization of jobs => congestion Zero last 2 address digits, secure web collection Eliminate cost of individual commute shed studies –Prepare a national legal opinion on aggregation Run nationally every 3 years
11
steve_raney@cities21.org Palo Alto PRT Feeder Forecast Commute Shed Education –Model, 3D VR Qualitative interviews –Basket of solutions Stated preference.
12
steve_raney@cities21.org Data Protection / Privacy Cautious environment "We have to assume that some day this data will get out. Employees will go 'nonlinear' if we give out this data. We are very, very sensitive to this possibility. If we can err on the side of privacy, we do, even if it appears externally to be 'stupid.'”
13
steve_raney@cities21.org E.U. Privacy Directive 95/46/EC Commerce Dept. Safe Harbor Agreement Adopted as unstated corporate privacy policies Requires employee consent to provide addresses Test: personally identifiable.
14
steve_raney@cities21.org E.U. Directive: Anonymization "in which data may be rendered anonymous and retained in a form in which identification of the data subject is no longer possible … using all means that are reasonably at their disposal." No “aggregation precedent”, Brussels: no help 4 U.S. privacy experts Corp. attorneys: unfamiliar, not geography experts “Eyes on data” - on site geocoding Voluntary participation.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.