Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBaldric Lang Modified over 9 years ago
1
Post transplant infections and its management
2
Introduction Recognizing the presentation of infections in transplanted patients is paramount However, immuno-suppressed patients often present atypically, and with far advanced stages of infection Fever is a non-specific finding, which can be attributed to medications and acute rejection Invasive testing is often required to make an accurate and timely diagnosis
3
PATHOGENESIS DISEASE DETERMINANTS MicrobeHost Inoculum or OrganismsVirulenceLatency DefenseMechanisms
4
HOST DEFENSE MECHANISMS Intact skin and mucous membranes Disrupted due to trauma, burns, ulceration, IV catheters, surgery Types of infection Wound infections, burn sepsis, diabetic foot infection, line sepsis Usual organisms Bacteria – environmental, endogenous Fungi – environmental, nosocomial
5
HOST DEFENSE MECHANISMS Physical removal / clearance of micro-organisms Respiratory muco-ciliary clearance Peristalsis and dynamics of hollow viscus (gut, bile ducts, ureter, fallopian tube) Maybe abnormal due to underlying disease, surgery, smoking etc. Intact sphincters/valves Types of infection Pneumonia, urosepsis, biliary sepsis Usual organisms Bacteria – environmental, endogenous
6
HOST DEFENSE MECHANISMS Endogenous microflora Oropharyngeal, gut, skin, vagina Important for preventing colonization with disease causing organisms (competitive) Antibiotics remove natural flora E.g. C. difficile colitis Chemical antimicrobial agents Gastric acidity, cutaneous fatty acids
7
HOST DEFENSE MECHANISMS Inflammatory response Number (mass) and function of circulating and tissue phagocytic cells Neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages, spleen Humoral Mediators Complement, fibronectin
8
HOST DEFENSE MECHANISMS Specific Immune response T-lymphocytes CD4+, CD*+ (helper, cytotoxic) Number, function B-lymphocytes Make antibodies IgG, IgA
9
Common problems Host Defect: Inflammatory response Common microbes Neutropenia (<0.5) Splenectomy Gram negative bacilli, Staph, Candida, Aspergillus S. Pneumonia, H. influenza, N. Meningitis
10
Common problems Host Defect: Complement Common microbes Early (C3, C5) Late (C6,7,8) S. Aureus, S. Pneumonia, gram negative bacilli Neisseria species
11
Common problems Host Defect: Immune response Common microbes T- Lymphocyte e.g. HIV, organ transplant B-Lymphocyte Numerous microbes S. Pneumonia, H. influenza, Giardia
12
INFECTION: BASIC PRINCIPLES Inflammatory response attenuated by immunosuppressants may abolish typical signs/symptoms decreased sensitivity of serological, radiological tests Effects of established infection may be devastating Treatment may have more toxicities Rifampin - decrease CsA Erythromycin, azoles increase CsA Synergistic nephrotoxicity - aminoglycosides, AmB, septra, cipro, vancomycin, pentamidine
13
INFECTIONS IN TRANSPLANTATION Three main determinants of the risk of infection in transplant recipients Infections related to technical / surgical problems
14
TECHNICAL COMPLICATIONS Liver - biliary tree - leaks, strictures Lung - bronchial anastomosis necrosis, dehiscence ; mediastinal fluid collection Kidney - uroterocystostomy - leak, urinoma Pancreas - duodenum-bladder; duodenum-bowel: anastomotic leaks, abscess
15
INFECTIONS IN TRANSPLANTATION Major determinants of the risk of infection The net state of ImmunosuppressionEpidemiologicalexposures
16
NET STATE OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Immunosuppressive therapy: dose, duration, temporal sequence - ‘area under the curve’ Underlying immune deficiency Mucocutaneous barrier integrity: intubation, drains, catheters, central lines Devitalized tissue, fluid collection Neutropenia, lymphopenia
17
NET STATE OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Metabolic conditions Uremia Malnutrition Diabetes Viral infection: Immune modulation Cytomegalovirus Epstein-Barr virus Hepatitis B, C, HIV
18
Epidemiology The risk, rate, and type of infection vary over time from transplantation Currently, there are no assays to measure risk/susceptibility to infection Risk of infection is an interplay between Exposure history (of donor and recipient) Intensity and quality of immunosuppression Use of prophylactic medications
19
Classification of Infections Donor-derived Recipient-derived Nosocomial Community-acquired
20
Donor-derived Infection Most are latent CMV, TB, T.cruzi Rarely can be acute Bacteremia/viremia at time of procurement West Nile, rabies, HIV, hepatitis, LCV The majority of these are sub-clinical in healthy patients, but can be catastrophic when transplanted into an immuno-suppressed patient At present, routine evaluations of donors for infectious diseases relies upon serologic antibody testing, and thus sensitivity is not 100% for those that may not have had time to seroconvert
21
Donor-derived Transplantation of organs from deceased donors with viral syndromes is controversial Livers with known Chagas or Hep B infection may be used as there are effective treatments for these infections Hep C infected organs are sometimes transplanted into Hep C(+) donors
22
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614
23
Recipient-derived Infections Infections that can be treated or controlled do not necessarily preclude transplantation Most commonly screened for: TB syphilis Viral: CMV, EBV, VZV, HSV, HIV, HBV, HCV Other things to think of T.cruzi, strongyloides, cryptococcus Endemic fungi: histoplasma, coccidioides, paracoccidioides, aspergillus, blastomycosis
24
Polyoma Viruses 2 major clinical manifestations are known BK virus JC virus both of these are members of the papovaviridae family JC virus is primarily associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in AIDS pt’s BK virus is primarily associated with nephropathy and ureteral obstruction Both are asymptomatic infections acquired in childhood that remain latent
25
BK virus First recognized in 1971, not truly appreciated until mid 1990’s when recognized as a cause for renal allograft loss (~5% incidence) Has a tropism for the uro-genital tract, tends to affect “diseased” kidneys Clinical manifestations asymptomatic hematuria hemorrhagic cystitis ureteral stenosis interstitial nephritis (nephropathy)
26
BK virus Viruria can be detected in many populations, but the most clinically important is renal transplant recipients Exact pathogenesis of the infection is poorly understood Diagnosis must be made histologically (biopsy) Special stains and PCR can help solidify the diagnosis
27
BK virus Treatment Only effective therapy is immune reconstitution (i.e. reduction of immunno-suppressant therapy) Cedofivir and leflunomide are effective in reducing viral load, but do very little to change the course of disease, and are both nephrotoxic One must effectively walk the tightrope between progressive renal destruction secondary to infection, and acute rejection causing graft loss
28
BK virus Several case reports exist for BK nephropathy in non-renal transplant recipients Bone marrow Heart Lung However, these are rare, and are at level of case report
29
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614
30
Immunizations Pt’s should be current on the following vaccines MMR HBV Influenza Strep pneumoniae Tetanus Diphtheria Pertussis Polio VZV – if never infected Consideration should be given to boosters for any of the above prior to transplantation as live vaccines are generally contraindicated post-transplant, and immunologic memory will become impaired
31
Peri-operative Prophylaxis Liver Skin, enterococcus, anaerobes, enterobacteriaceae Most common site of invasive fungal infection Lung GNR, molds, endemic fungi MRSA and VRE according to antiobiogram prevalence Second most common site of invasive fungal infection
32
Nosocomial Infections MRSA VRE fluconazole-resistant Candida species associated with surgical site and indwelling catheters C.diff Resistant gram-negative bacilli, Pseudomonas, Aspergillus
33
Community Infections Aspergillus Nocardia Cryptococcus neoformans (birds) Respiratory viruses Community acquired pneumonia pathogen HIV, hepatitis viruses Environmental fungi Secondary bacterial superinfection Enteric bacterial pathogens (salmonella) TB, zoonosis,
34
Monitoring Immunosuppression There are no specific tests currently available to determine the overall susceptibility of patients to infection… …but they are on the horizon Currently, the known determinants contributing to the overall risk of infection are the dose, duration, and sequence of immunosuppressive therapies
35
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614 Dynamic Assessment of the Risk of Infection after Transplantation
36
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614 Changing Timeline of Infection after Organ Transplantation
37
Early post-transplant period (30d) Opportunistic infections are rare in the first month post-transplant >1 month of medical therapy is required to effectively deplete cell-mediated therapy One exception is large, prolonged doses of corticosteroids Infections are generally donor-derived or associated with complications from the surgery itself
39
TIMETABLE: 0-1 MONTH Infections usual to post-op patients nosocomial pneumonia, wound, line sepsis, UTI Key factors: nature of the operation, technical skill Lung, heart, liver at highest risk longer intubation, ICU stay, lines, catheters Most OI’s (eg. PCP) absent in the first month Exceptions – HSV, HHV6, Candida, Aspergillus
40
TIMETABLE: 0-1 MONTH Also may see Infection transmitted with the allograft: eg. lung transplant with pneumonia or a donor bacteremia which seeds the vascular anastamosis Pre-existing infection within the recipient made worse by the transplant
41
Intermediate period (1-6mos) Viral infections and allograft rejection account for the majority of febrile episodes Adherence to Cotrimoxazole and antiviral prophylaxis renders infections such as PCP, UTI’s, listeria, toxoplasmosis, and herpes very unlikely Fungi, cryptococcus, T.cruzi, strongyloides can surface Other: polyoma virus (BK and JC), recurrent HCV
43
TIMETABLE OF INFECTION One to 6 months post-Tx Maximal period of immunosuppression Effect of sustained immunosuppression or ‘area under the curve’ Opportunistic infections in the absence of excessive epidemiological hazard
44
TIMETABLE - 1 TO 6 MONTHS VIRAL CMV, EBV, VZV, HHV-6, Adenovirus, Influenza, RSV BACTERIAL Nocardia, Legionella, Listeria, TB FUNGAL PCP, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, endemic mycosis PARASITIC Toxoplasma, Strongyloides
45
Late post-transplant period (>6mos) Risk wanes as immunosuppressive therapy is tapered Risk profile however, is “reset” with each episode of acute rejection Chronic viral infections can cause allograft injury HCV cirrhosis BOOP in lungs CMV coronary vasculopathy PTLD Skin/anogenital cancers Fungi/molds, viruses and “typical” bugs still remain on radar
47
TIMETABLE - > 6 MONTHS GROUP 1: Good graft function, minimal immunosuppression Community acquired pneumonia, UTI, OI based on intense exposure GROUP 2: Recurrent or chronic rejection, high level immunosuppression, chronic viral replication Continued risk of opportunistic infections
48
Long-term Prophylaxis Co-trimoxazole for at least 3 months, sometimes for life CMV and HSV prophylaxis is not standardized, and varies according to immunno-suppressive regimen and institution Rarely chronic suppressive antifungal Rx for pt’s with history of significant disease
49
CMV PREVENTION Universal prophylaxis: anti-viral therapy to all ‘at- risk’ patients Pre-emptive therapy: anti-viral therapy to subgroups of ‘at-risk’ patients usually based on further diagnostic tests aimed at identifying early viral reactivation
50
PRE-EMPTIVE THERAPY + _ ++++ ___ ++ _ 048 12 weeks Could have initiated pre-emptive therapy CMV disease TEST
51
CMV IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS PRE-TRANSPLANT: Donor and recipient CMV serology POST-TRANSPLANT: D+/R+, D-/R+ Week 2-12: E very clinic visit : CMV antigenemia CMV quantitative PCR D+/R-: G anciclovir prophylaxis 12 weeks Bloodwork at week 12, 14, 16, 18. CMV antigenemia and quantitative PCR testing
52
General Lifestyle Recommendations Avoid sick contacts, esp respiratory Avoid dusty sites (i.e. construction sites) Avoid ingestion of well and lake water Avoid undercooked meats Avoid soft cheeses and unpasteurized dairy products Avoid unwashed fruits/veggies
53
Summary Be aware of the time frame from transplant leading you to the most likely type of infection <30d think nosocomial or donor-derived 1-6mos, reactivation of viruses and atypical infections “classic” for transplant pt’s >6mos, think of “typical” or community- acquired bugs as their risk returns to somewhat normal
54
Fishman J. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-2614 Assessment of the Risk of Infection at the Time of Transplantation
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.