Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango,

Published byProsper Shelton Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango,"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango, and Tommy VanVeghel San José State University

2 The Diabetes Epidemic In U.S. alone, 24+ million (CDC, 2007/2008) –Diagnosable diabetes > 8% of U.S. population –Another 57 million with pre-diabetes 250+ million worldwide (WHO, 2009) –7 million/year increase in cases –Causes 5% of deaths globally –Number of deaths to double by 2030 Still uncertain etiology in Type 2 Diabetes –Population rates related to obesity

3 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1994

4 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1995

5 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1996

6 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1997

7 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1998

8 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 1999

9 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2000

10 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2001

11 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2002

12 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2003

13 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2004

14 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2005

15 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2006

16 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2007

17 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2008

18 CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. National Diabetes Surveillance System available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics Obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m 2 ) Diabetes <4.5% Missing data 4.5 - 5.9% 6.0 - 7.4% 7.5 - 8.9% ≥9.0% 18.0 -21.9% <14.0% Missing Data 14.0 - 17.9% 22.0 - 25.9%≥26.0% Age-adjusted Percentage of U.S. Adults Who Were Obese or Who Had Diagnosed Diabetes 2008

19 Depression and Diabetes Those with comorbid Diabetes and Depression Show less adherence to prescription regimen Tend to partake in fewer self-management activities Are at increased risk for undesirable and preventable medical outcomes and mortality (Gonzalez et al., 2007; Ciechanowski et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2004; Kalsekar et al., 2006; Katon et al., 2005; Katon et al., 2009) People with Diabetes at 1.6- 2.0x risk for Depression (Anderson et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2006) No difference has been reported (Téllez-Zenteno et al., 2002) People with Depression at 23-37% increased risk for developing Diabetes (Knol et al., 2006; Brown et al., 2005)

20 Depression, Stress, & Diabetes Stress –“Perceived Stress” –Acute stressors and Allostatic Load Depression and Stress correlated –Stress also important in chronic disease –Self-Management & Adherence linked with blood sugar control –Blood sugar control linked with medical outcomes and mortality in diabetes

21 Cortisol, Diabetes, & Depression Stress biomedically related to diabetes in a way we don’t often see with psychological disorders –Affects behavior (self-management, etc.) –But *also* matters biologically Cortisol related to “Fight or Flight” –Related to both Stress and Depression –Activation of HPA Axis, inhibits insulin action –Increased blood sugar levels –Increased risk for undesirable medical outcomes

22 Previous Research Sacco et al. (2005, 2007) Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model “…enhancing adherence in people with diabetes should enhance their physical and mental health by reducing depressive symptoms.” Recommend emphasis on diet and exercise adherence AdherenceDepression - 0.35* -0.38* 20052007* p <.01 † p = n.s. Self-Efficacy AdherenceDepression 0.74* -0.41* -0.38* † †† †

23 But From an ACT Perspective Sacco et al. (2005, 2007) Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model “…enhancing adherence in people with diabetes should enhance their physical and mental health by reducing depressive symptoms.” Recommend emphasis on diet and exercise adherence AdherenceDepression - 0.35* -0.38* 20052007* p <.01 † p = n.s. Self-Efficacy AdherenceDepression 0.74* -0.41* -0.38* † †† †

24 But From an ACT Perspective Sacco et al. (2005, 2007) Self-Efficacy mediates adherence and depression Doesn’t give us a way to intervene within the model Adherence is still the problem!! We already know that adherence efforts don’t work consistently AdherenceDepression Believability AdherenceDepression Adherence ? ? ?

25 Believability An Intervention for Adherence Varied levels of depression symptoms related to high levels of non-adherence (Fisher et al., 2007; Gonzalez et al., 2007) –Some patients “distressed,” not depressed Conflicting support for Depression as predictor in mediation, and relationship remains complicated (McKellar et al., 2004; Gregg et al., 2010) –Insulin vs. medication adherence (Aikens et al., 2008) –Gender differences (Nau et al., 2007) Need interventions that provide patients with behavioral tools delivered within the diabetes self-management and depression relationship.

26 Research Questions 1.Does Believability of Negative Thoughts mediate relationship between Adherence to diabetes self- management and Depression? 2.Does Believability of Negative Thoughts mediate the relationship between Adherence to diabetes self- management and Stress?

27 Methods Cross-sectional internet-based survey Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (N=171) ◦ Diabetes-specific discussion boards, websites, and forums ◦ $5 Amazon.com gift card Depression, Stress, Diabetes Self-Care Exclusions: Duplicate IP address, International, Entries not referring to Diabetes, Pregnant, Eating Disorder (N=34)

28 Methods - Measures Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ-B) –“Believability” or Cognitive Fusion Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities –“Adherence” –Diet and exercise focus –E.g., “On how many of the last 7 days did you eat your recommended number of vegetables?”

29 Methods: Mediation Analysis 1.Adherence predicts Stress 2.Believability predicts Stress 3.Adherence predicts Believability 4.Statistically significant reduction of the predictive power of Adherence on Stress when Believability is controlled Believability AdherenceStress Proposed Model

30 Research Question 1 Depression Model Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010) –Model not significant with Depression as predictor Believability AdherenceDepression -0.24**0.48*** -0.37*** * p <.01** p <.001

31 Research Question 1 Depression Model Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010) –Model not significant with Depression as predictor Believability AdherenceDepression -0.24**0.48*** -0.37*** Believability AdherenceDepression -0.24**0.42*** -0.27** * p <.01** p <.001

32 Research Question 1 Depression Model Believability of Negative Thoughts mediates Adherence and Depression (Gregg et al., 2010) –Model not significant with Depression as predictor Believability AdherenceDepression -0.24**0.48*** -0.37*** Believability AdherenceDepression -0.24**0.42*** -0.27** β = −.270, t (121) = -3.428, p <.01 Sobel = 2.43, p =.015 * p <.01** p <.001

33 Results: Stress Model Believability AdherenceStress Proposed Model Adherence Stress Believability Stress β = −.279, t (119) = -3.182, p =.002 Adherence Believability β =.306, t (119) = 3.574, p =.001 β = −.240, t (119) = -2.711, p =.008 Depression Stress r =.219 p =.01 Measures Stress: Perceived Stress Scale Believability: Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire - B Adherence: Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Depression: Beck Depression Inventory

34 Results: Stress Model Believability AdherenceStress -0.24**0.31*** -0.28** *p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001 Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress –Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and Adherence

35 Results: Stress Model Believability AdherenceStress -0.24**0.31*** -0.28** Believability AdherenceStress -0.24**0.33*** -0.20* *p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001 Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress –Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and Adherence

36 Results: Stress Model Believability AdherenceStress -0.24**0.31*** -0.28** Believability AdherenceStress -0.24**0.33*** -0.20* β = −.200, t (119) = -2.337, p =.021 Sobel = 2.184, p =.029 *p<.05 **p<.01 ***p<.001 Believability of Negative Thoughts mediated Adherence and Perceived Stress –Partial mediation with Believability for Stress, Depression, and Adherence

37 Discussion Depression and Stress related to Adherence Believability mediated both relationships –Adherence → Depression –Adherence → Stress –Depression and Stress correlated Contributes to the viability of Believability as a clinical target in this population –ACT for Clinically Depressed patients with Diabetes –Principles of ACT incorporated into Diabetes Education Gregg et al. (2007) reported more desirable blood sugar and self-management at 3 months in group receiving 1-day ACT with Diabetes Education

38 Future Research Limitations –Cross-Sectional Data –Internet-Based (benefit?) –Self-Report –Strength of Relationships Future Research –Are these models bi-directional? Causation? –Do these models represent distinct sub-populations? –Can ACT principles lead to benefits in Diabetes self- management at various stages of diabetes and psychological flexibility? ATQ-Frequency ATQ-Believability r =.569*** For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

39 References Ali, S., Stone, M.A., Peters, J.L., Davies, M.J., & Kunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 1165-1173. Anderson, R.J., Feedland, K.E., Clouse, R.E., & Lustman, P.J. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, 1069-1078. Brown, L.C., Majumdar, S.R., Newman, S.C., & Johnson, J.A. (2005). History of depression increases risk of type 2 diabetes in younger adults. Diabetes Care, 28, 1063-1067. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. Ciechanowski, P.S., Katon, W.J., & Russo, J.E. (2000). Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 3278-3285. Fisher, L., Skaff, M.M., Mullan, J.T., Arean, P., Mohr, D., Masharani, U., et al. (2007). Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes. Not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care, 30, 542-548. Gonzalez, J.S., Safren, S.A., Cagliero, E., Wexler, D.J., Delahanty, L., Wittenberg, E. et al. (2007). Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30, 2222-2227. For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

40 References Gregg, J.A., Callaghan, G.M., Hayes, S.C., & Glenn-Lawson, J.L. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 336-343. Gregg, J.A., Schmidt, E.S., Ward, K.C., Almada, P., & Knezevich, P. (2010). An alternative model for understanding the diabetes-depression relationship: The mediational role of thought believability. Journal of Behavioral Health and Medicine, 1 (1), 15-23. Kalsekar, I.D., Madhavan, S.S., Amonkar, M.M., Makela, E.H., Scott, V.G., Douglas, S.M., et al. (2006). Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: Impact on adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40, 605-611. Katon, W.J., Rutter, C., Simon, G., Lin, E.H.B., Ludman, E., Ciechanowski, P. et al. (2005). The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 2668-2672. Katon, W., Russo, J., Lin, E.H.G., Heckbert, S.R., Karter, A.J., Williams, L.H., et al. (2009). Diabetes and poor disease control: Is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack of treatment intensification? Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 965-972. Knol, M.J., Twisk, J.W.R, Beekman, A.T.F., Heine, R.J. Snoek, F.J., & Pouwer, F. (2006). Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 49, 837-845. For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

41 References Lin, E.H.B., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., Simon, G.E., Oliver, M., et al. (2004). Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care, 27, 2154-2160. Nau, D.P., Aikens, J.E., & Pacholski, A.M. (2007). Effects of gender and depression on oral medication adherence in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gender Medicine, 4, 205- 213. Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Vaughan, C.A., Friedman, A., Perez, S., & Matthew, R. (2005). Depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: The role of adherence, body mass index, and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 24, 630-634. Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Friedman, A., Matthew, R., Perez, S., & Vaughan, C.A. (2007). Adherence, body mass index, and depression in type 2 diabetes: The mediational role of diabetes symptoms and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 26, 693-700. Téllez-Zenteno, J.F., & Cardiel, M.H. (2002). Risk factors associated with depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Archives of Medical Research, 33 (1), 53-60. World Health Organization (2009). Diabetes fact sheet. No 312. WHO Statistical Information System, Global Burden of Disease Project. Available at http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html, downloaded May 15, 2010. http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

42 References Ali, S., Stone, M.A., Peters, J.L., Davies, M.J., & Kunti, K. (2006). The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 1165-1173. Anderson, R.J., Feedland, K.E., Clouse, R.E., & Lustman, P.J. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, 1069-1078. Brown, L.C., Majumdar, S.R., Newman, S.C., & Johnson, J.A. (2005). History of depression increases risk of type 2 diabetes in younger adults. Diabetes Care, 28, 1063-1067. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. Ciechanowski, P.S., Katon, W.J., & Russo, J.E. (2000). Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160, 3278-3285. Fisher, L., Skaff, M.M., Mullan, J.T., Arean, P., Mohr, D., Masharani, U., et al. (2007). Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes. Not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care, 30, 542-548. Gonzalez, J.S., Safren, S.A., Cagliero, E., Wexler, D.J., Delahanty, L., Wittenberg, E. et al. (2007). Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30, 2222-2227. For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

43 References Gregg, J.A., Callaghan, G.M., Hayes, S.C., & Glenn-Lawson, J.L. (2007). Improving diabetes self-management through acceptance, mindfulness, and values: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 336-343. Gregg, J.A., Schmidt, E.S., Ward, K.C., Almada, P., & Knezevich, P. (2010). An alternative model for understanding the diabetes-depression relationship: The mediational role of thought believability. Journal of Behavioral Health and Medicine, 1 (1), 15-23. Kalsekar, I.D., Madhavan, S.S., Amonkar, M.M., Makela, E.H., Scott, V.G., Douglas, S.M., et al. (2006). Depression in patients with type 2 diabetes: Impact on adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40, 605-611. Katon, W.J., Rutter, C., Simon, G., Lin, E.H.B., Ludman, E., Ciechanowski, P. et al. (2005). The association of comorbid depression with mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 2668-2672. Katon, W., Russo, J., Lin, E.H.G., Heckbert, S.R., Karter, A.J., Williams, L.H., et al. (2009). Diabetes and poor disease control: Is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack of treatment intensification? Psychosomatic Medicine, 71, 965-972. Knol, M.J., Twisk, J.W.R, Beekman, A.T.F., Heine, R.J. Snoek, F.J., & Pouwer, F. (2006). Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 49, 837-845. For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

44 References Lin, E.H.B., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., Simon, G.E., Oliver, M., et al. (2004). Relationship of depression and diabetes self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. Diabetes Care, 27, 2154-2160. Nau, D.P., Aikens, J.E., & Pacholski, A.M. (2007). Effects of gender and depression on oral medication adherence in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gender Medicine, 4, 205- 213. Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Vaughan, C.A., Friedman, A., Perez, S., & Matthew, R. (2005). Depression in adults with type 2 diabetes: The role of adherence, body mass index, and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 24, 630-634. Sacco, W.P., Wells, K.J., Friedman, A., Matthew, R., Perez, S., & Vaughan, C.A. (2007). Adherence, body mass index, and depression in type 2 diabetes: The mediational role of diabetes symptoms and self-efficacy. Health Psychology, 26, 693-700. Téllez-Zenteno, J.F., & Cardiel, M.H. (2002). Risk factors associated with depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Archives of Medical Research, 33 (1), 53-60. World Health Organization (2009). Diabetes fact sheet. No 312. WHO Statistical Information System, Global Burden of Disease Project. Available at http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html, downloaded May 15, 2010. http://www.who.int/diabetes/facts/en/index.html For more information, contact Eric Schmidt at eric.schmidt@stanford.edu

Download ppt "The Role of Thought Believability in the Relationship Between Depression, Diabetes, and Stress. Eric Schmidt, Kate Ward, Jennifer Gregg, Jesse Tarango,"

Similar presentations

June 25, 2006 Propensity Score Adjustment in Survival Models Carolyn Rutter Group Health Cooperative AcademyHealth, Seattle WA.

June 25, 2006 Propensity Score Adjustment in Survival Models Carolyn Rutter Group Health Cooperative AcademyHealth, Seattle WA.
Www.likes.fi Towards a physically more active lifestyle based on one´s own values: the results of a randomized controlled trial among physically inactive.

Towards a physically more active lifestyle based on one´s own values: the results of a randomized controlled trial among physically inactive.
Reductions in Regimen Distress Are Associated With Improved Management and Glycemic Control Over Time Featured Article: Danielle Hessler, Lawrence Fisher,

Reductions in Regimen Distress Are Associated With Improved Management and Glycemic Control Over Time Featured Article: Danielle Hessler, Lawrence Fisher,
National Diabetes Statistics Report Fun Facts on Diabetes 29.1 million people or 9.3% of the US population have diabetes. Diagnose : 21.0 million people.

National Diabetes Statistics Report Fun Facts on Diabetes 29.1 million people or 9.3% of the US population have diabetes. Diagnose : 21.0 million people.
Sedentary Lifestyle Are We So Lazy That It’s Killing Us?

Sedentary Lifestyle Are We So Lazy That It’s Killing Us?
FACTORS HINDERING ATTITUDE TO TREATMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN THE NIGER DELTA, NIGERIA by AGOFURE OTOVWE and OYEWOLE OYEDIRAN.

FACTORS HINDERING ATTITUDE TO TREATMENT AMONG PATIENTS WITH TYPE-2 DIABETES MELLITUS IN THE NIGER DELTA, NIGERIA by AGOFURE OTOVWE and OYEWOLE OYEDIRAN.
PAULA M. TRIEF, PHD PROFESSOR OF PSYCHIATRY & MEDICINE SENIOR ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR FACULTY AFFAIRS SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- SYRACUSE, NY DIABETES.

PAULA M. TRIEF, PHD PROFESSOR OF PSYCHIATRY & MEDICINE SENIOR ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR FACULTY AFFAIRS SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY- SYRACUSE, NY DIABETES.
PEBB Disease Burden Report PEBB Board of Directors August 21, 2007 Bdattach.10.

PEBB Disease Burden Report PEBB Board of Directors August 21, 2007 Bdattach.10.
Theoretical Framework Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) Self-Management Nursing 8782 Jennifer Bauman, RN, BA, PCCN December 2, 2013.

Theoretical Framework Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) Self-Management Nursing 8782 Jennifer Bauman, RN, BA, PCCN December 2, 2013.
Managing depression in people with long term conditions Chris Dickens Professor of Psychological Medicine Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry.

Managing depression in people with long term conditions Chris Dickens Professor of Psychological Medicine Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry.
The Burden of Diabetes 1. Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States 2 1. CDC. National diabetes fact sheet, 2008.

The Burden of Diabetes 1. Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States 2 1. CDC. National diabetes fact sheet, 2008.
 Excessive urination (polyuria)  Excessive thirst (polydipsia)  Weight loss  Vision changes  Hunger  Fatigue  Long term risks include heart disease,

 Excessive urination (polyuria)  Excessive thirst (polydipsia)  Weight loss  Vision changes  Hunger  Fatigue  Long term risks include heart disease,
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,

® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Trends in Health and Aging Major Trends and Patterns in Diabetes for Older Americans July 2007.

Trends in Health and Aging Major Trends and Patterns in Diabetes for Older Americans July 2007.
Health Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Paula A. Johnson, MD, MPH Chief, Division of Women’s Health; Executive Director, Connors Center for Women’s.

Health Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Paula A. Johnson, MD, MPH Chief, Division of Women’s Health; Executive Director, Connors Center for Women’s.
Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium Modest Weight Loss in T2 DM: Lessons from the Look AHEAD Trial Donna H. Ryan, MD Pennington Biomedical Research Center.

Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium Modest Weight Loss in T2 DM: Lessons from the Look AHEAD Trial Donna H. Ryan, MD Pennington Biomedical Research Center.
Chapter 21: Adherence to Medical Regimens Alan M. Delamater Ashley Marchante Amber Daigre.

Chapter 21: Adherence to Medical Regimens Alan M. Delamater Ashley Marchante Amber Daigre.
Introduction Nearly 26 million people are diagnosed with diabetes in the United States, roughly 8.5% of the total population (A.D.A. 2013). 2.1 million.

Introduction Nearly 26 million people are diagnosed with diabetes in the United States, roughly 8.5% of the total population (A.D.A. 2013). 2.1 million.
SUPPORTING PRIMARY CARE TO ACHIEVE TARGETS. What targets? 1.9 care processes 2.3 health targets (HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol) AND IMPORTANTLY Quality.

SUPPORTING PRIMARY CARE TO ACHIEVE TARGETS. What targets? 1.9 care processes 2.3 health targets (HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol) AND IMPORTANTLY Quality.
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIMARY PREVENTION CONTROL PROGRAM OF PHC PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY CLINIC AMONG PATIENTS AT RISK FOR CVD: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIMARY PREVENTION CONTROL PROGRAM OF PHC PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY CLINIC AMONG PATIENTS AT RISK FOR CVD: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google