Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology Prague.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology Prague."— Presentation transcript:

1 Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology Prague

2 2 Aim: to compare branded foodstuff in the Czech Republic and Germany Partners: Olga Sehnalová MEP and Ahold Czech Republic Evaluator – University of Chemistry and Technology PragueProject

3 3Purchase Germany – Dresden (EDEKA, REWE, Kaufland) – 25/2/2015 Czech Republic - Prague(Tesco, Kaufland, Albert) – 27/2/2015 Proper storage during transport

4 4 Physico-chemical testing Analysis of qualitative features allowing to assess the difference Accredited laboratories Results submitted to the commission for further consideration

5 5 Sensory assessment Different kinds of examination 30 trainted evaluators participed in the assessment o Participating in the evaluation regularly o Trained on the principles of sensory evaluation

6 6 Products assessment Evaluate compliance / non-compliance in qualitative characteristics Set the hypothesis which may cause difference in findings Information available to the commission: o Results of the physico-chemical testing o Results of sensory assessment o Packages

7 7Results 24 products submitted 1 product not included in the final evaluation due to doubts about the identical marketing 8 products classified as different = 35% of products involved Assessment of the overall "quality" has not been studied

8 8 TrademarkProduct Sensory assessment Preference Chemist ry Declaration Conclusio n Price per unit GERPrice per unit CZ MovempickBourbon VanillaC-CCC0,42 €/100 ml0,52 €/100 ml Pfanner100% orange juiceDCZCCC1,40 €/1 l1,33 €/1 l Pepsi cola C-DDD0,63 €/1 l0,31 €/1 l Sprite DNoDDD0,65 €/1 l0,73 €/1 l NesteaIce Tea lemonDGERDDD0,86 €/1 l0,87 €/1 l JacobsKronungDNoDCD3,95 €/100 g1,91 €/100 g SegafredoEspresso CosyC-DCC1,50 €/100 g1,23 €/100 g MülerBox blueberryDGERCCC0,45 €/100 g0,39 €/100 g DanoneActivia strawberryDCZDDD0,40 €/100 g0,33 €/100 g Leerdamer original DNoCCC1,42 €/100 g1,38 €/100 g UnileverRamaDGERDDD0,32 €/100 g IgloFish fingersDGERCDD0,39 €/100 g0,87 €/100 g Rio mareTuna tinDCZCDD1,68 €/100 g3,09 €/100 g TULIPLuch meatDNoCDD0,44 €/100g0,86 €/100 g PICKSalamiDNoCCC2,12 €/100 g2,46 €/100 g MeicaSausagesDGERCCC0,99 €/100 g1,27 €/100 g CarbonellExtra virginC-CCC0,96 €/100 ml0,98 €/100 ml HeinzKetchupC-CCC0,46 €/100 ml0,32 €/100 ml SchawartauStrawberry jamDCZCCC0,61 €/100 g0,69 €/100 g Kinder C-CCC0,69 €/1 ks StorkToffifeeC-CCC0,95 €/100 g1,16 €/100 g BountyChocolate barC-CCC0,72 €/100 g0,76 €/100 g BarillaArrabbiataC-CCC0,37 €/100 g0,75 €/100g BonduelleGold sweet cornDNoCCC0,35 €/100 g0,43 €/100 g C – Conformity D - Difference

9 Different colorants, however both on natural basis Different content of fat o CZ: 2,43 g/100 g; GER: 2,93 g/100 g CZ: milk protein added 9 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZDDD C=conformity D=difference Analysis Colorants, sugar, protein, fat ProducerProduct DanoneActivia strawberry

10 10 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MülerBox blueberry Analysis Colorants, sugar, protein, fat

11 11 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct UnileverRama Analysis Fatty acids, fats, preservatives, vitamins… CZ fat content 60%; GER fat content 70 %

12 12 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Leerdamer original Analysis Fat, dry basis

13 13 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct PICKSalami Analysis Meat content, Na

14 CZ main component – mechanically separated poultry meat GER main component pork meat 14 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion D noCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct TULIPLuch meat Analysis Meat content, Na

15 15 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Kinder Analysis Fat, milk fat, protein..

16 16 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SchawartauStrawberry jam Analysis K, Mg, Ca, colorants, fruit content, sugars profile

17 17 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BarillaArrabbiata Analysis Na, K, Mg, tomatoes content

18 18 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct CarbonellExtra virgin Analysis presence of other oils, presence of refined oil

19 19 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MeicaSausages Analysis Meat content, Na

20 20 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DNoCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BonduelleGold sweet corn Analysis Solid, Na

21 21 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Pfanner100% Orange Juice Analysis K, Mg, Ca, aroma recovery index, fruit juice content

22 22 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct HeinzKetchup Analysis Tomatoes content

23 CZ coffee has almost 1/3 higher caffeine content 23 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Dno DCD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct JacobsKrönung Analysis caffeine

24 CZ product sweetened with glucose-fructose syrup; GER sugar 24 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Pepsi cola Analysis caffeine, sugars content, phosphorus

25 CZ sweetened fructose-glucose syrup, aspartame and acesulfame GER sugar 25 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DnoDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Sprite Analysis Sugars content

26 CZ product sweetened with sugar, fructose, and steviol glycosides;GER only sugar CZ product contains 40 % less tea extract 26 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERDDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct NesteaIce Tea lemon Analysis caffeine, theobromin, sugars content

27 27 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-DCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct SegafredoEspresso Casa Analysis burned and broken grains

28 28 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DCZCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct Rio mareTuna tin Analysis solids, protein, fat Nejedná se o stejnou značku.

29 29 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct BountyChocolate bar Analysis vegetable fats, cocoa solids, sugar content, chocolate content

30 30 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct StorkToffifee Analysis Cocoa content, nuts content

31 Products vary in meat content. CZ product contains about 7% less meat than Germany. The raw material used is the same. 31 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion DGERCDD C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct IgloFish fingers Analysis Fish meat content

32 32 SensoryPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion C-CCC C=conformity D=difference ProducerProduct MovempickBourbon Vanilla Analysis Other fat, fat

33 33Summary TrademarkProduct Sensory assessmentPreferenceChemistryDeclarationConclusion Pepsi cola CnoDDD Sprite DnoDDD NesteaIce Tea lemonDGermanyDDD JacobsKronungDnoDCD DanoneActivia strawberyDCZDDD UnileverRamaDGermanyDDD IgloFish fingersDGermanyCDD TULIPLuch meatDnoCDD 8 products classified as different = 35% of products involved


Download ppt "Testing, evaluation and comparison of foodstuff bought in the Czech Republic and Germany University of Chemistry and Technology Prague."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google