1. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Science Gateways on the TeraGrid Charlie Catlett, Sebastien Goasguen, Jim Marsteller, Stuart Martin, Don Middleton, Kevin J. Price, Anurag Shankar, Von Welch, Nancy Wilkins-Diehr

2. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Today’s Topics TeraGrid Background – 5 min. Gateway integration issues – 15 min. –Accounting GRAM –Security Commsh Attribute-based authentication –Metrics Future work – 10 min. –Gateway primer –Best practices

3. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 What is the TeraGrid? NSF-funded facility to offer high end compute, data and visualization resources to the nation’s academic researchers

4. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 TeraGrid Technology Data 18.8 Petabytes Storage Memory Intensive Resources Computation Visualization 100+ Teraflops Computation 40gigabit/second cross-country network

5. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Over 100 Tflops in Computing Power

6. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 TeraGrid Resources Available to Academic Researchers at No Cost TeraGrid creates integrated, persistent, and pioneering computational resources that significantly improve our nation’s ability and capacity to gain new insights into our most challenging research questions and societal problems. Proposal-based access, researchers can use resources at no cost –Collaborative opportunities, but Principal Investigators must be from the U.S.

7. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Gateways are part of TeraGrid’s 3-pronged strategy to further science DEEP Science: Enabling Terascale Science –Make science more productive through an integrated set of very- high capability resources Advanced Support for TeraGrid Applications (ASTA) projects WIDE Impact: Empowering Communities –Bring TeraGrid capabilities to the broad science community Science Gateways OPEN Infrastructure, OPEN Partnership –Provide a coordinated, general purpose, reliable set of services and resources Grid interoperability working group

8. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Science Gateways A new initiative for the TeraGrid Increasing investment by communities in their own cyberinfrastructure, but heterogeneous: Resources Users – from expert to K-12 Software stacks, policies Science Gateways –Provide “TeraGrid Inside” capabilities –Leverage community investment Three common forms: –Web-based Portals –Application programs running on users' machines but accessing services in TeraGrid –Coordinated access points enabling users to move seamlessly between TeraGrid and other grids. Workflow Composer

9. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Gateways are growing in numbers 10 initial projects as part of TG proposal >20 Gateway projects today No limit on how many gateways can use TG resources –Prepare services and documentation so developers can work independently Open Science Grid (OSG) Special PRiority and Urgent Computing Environment (SPRUCE) National Virtual Observatory (NVO) Linked Environments for Atmospheric Discovery (LEAD) Computational Chemistry Grid (GridChem) Computational Science and Engineering Online (CSE- Online) GEON(GEOsciences Network) Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) SCEC Earthworks Project Network for Computational Nanotechnology and nanoHUB GIScience Gateway (GISolve) Biology and Biomedicine Science Gateway Open Life Sciences Gateway The Telescience Project Grid Analysis Environment (GAE) Neutron Science Instrument Gateway TeraGrid Visualization Gateway, ANL BIRN Gridblast Bioinformatics Gateway Earth Systems Grid Astrophysical Data Repository (Cornell) Many others interested –SID Grid –HASTAC

10. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 TeraGrid Background – 5 min. Gateway integration issues – 15 min. –Accounting GRAM –Security Commsh Attribute-based authentication –Metrics Future work – 10 min. –Gateway primer –Best practices

11. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 What Did We Learn About Common Gateway Requirements? Accounting –Support for accounts with differing capabilities –Ability to associate compute job to a individual portal user –Scheme for portal registration and usage tracking –Dynamic accounts Security –Community account privileges –Need to identify human responsible for a job for incident response –Acceptance of other grid certificates Web Services –Many will build on the Globus Toolkit, but additional interfaces may be needed –Web Service security –Interfaces to scheduling and account management are common requirements Software –Interoperability of software stacks between TeraGrid and peer grids –Software installations for gateways across all TG sites –Community software areas –Management (pacman, other options)

12. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 In Today’s Talk Per job accounting Secured community accounts Federated identity management Metrics for Success Futures –Primer –Gateway Best Practices

13. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 “Per Job” Accounting is Key Functionality for Gateways Common gateway structure – Web front end, users log on to gateway –Jobs run as single user on TeraGrid –Need to tie usage to individual users Globus used by many gateway developers to access TeraGrid resources GRAM operates in a fire and forget mode –When a job finishes there is no straightforward way to determine how many CPU hours the job consumed –That information is critical to attributing usage to individual users using a Science Gateway account on the TeraGrid

14. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 GRAM Audit Extension Provides Need Accountability GRAM2 and GRAM4 services were enhanced to create audit records that are written to a database local to the GRAM services Enhancements provide a persistent link between the grid service’s job id and the local resource manager’s (LRM) job id Open Grid Services Architecture-Data Access and Integration (OGSA-DAI) provide a service interface for TeraGrid’s audit and accounting information

15. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Individual Usage Tracking Now Possible Gateways can remotely submit jobs to TeraGrid and –Account for usage on a per job basis without needing to understand the details of the various local resource managers chosen by TeraGrid resource providers. Capability will be very useful for other projects using Globus where per-job usage information is needed. Enhancements reduce the complexity for gateways to interface with TeraGrid’s computational resources –Allows TeraGrid to simultaneously support an increasing number of gateways.

16. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Linked Environments for Atmospheric Discovery Providing tools that are needed to make accurate predictions of tornados and hurricanes Meteorological data Forecast models Analysis and visualization tools Data exploration and Grid workflow

17. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Securing Community Accounts Additional risks arise when providing community account and web interfaces to high performance resources. TeraGrid security working group analyzing risks developing mitigation approaches. –Sites may take independent approaches to risk mitigation One approach being developed at NCSA is the Community Shell, or Commsh Commsh allows for two methods of account restriction: –a configuration file is created that defines which commands (or sets of commands) a given account can execute. –commands can be specified using wildcards and regular expressions for flexibility –change-root (or chroot) jailing. Change-root jailing effectively creates a filesystem-based "sandbox" for the account, only allowing commands to be executed from within this sandbox

18. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 NanoHub Harnesses TeraGrid for Education Nanotechnology education Used in dozens of courses at man universities Teaching materials Collaboration space Research seminars Modeling tools Access to cutting edge research software And much more

19. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Federated Identity Management Traditionally each resource or resource-providing site was responsible for the management of their users identities The science gateway model brought an out-sourcing of identity management from the resource to the gateway For maximum scalability, the goal is to shift identity management all the way back to the user’s home institution and leverage the existing identity management infrastructure Mechanisms to achieve this based on Shibboleth, GridShib, myVocs are other technologies are currently being evaluated by TeraGrid

20. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Individual User Environment Resource TGCDB uid project (G)Id Grant Process Use cases: Traditional users, Development O(10) O(1) O(10) O(1000) O(1)

21. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Authenticated User Environment Resource TGCDB project (G)Id Grant Process Use cases: Grid-savvy user communities, Production runs, user managed services uid O(10) ? O(10) O(1) O(10) O(1)

22. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Gateway Gateway Environment Resource TGCDB project Grant Process Use cases: Large communities of users, novice users, public uid GId ComId O(1) ? O(10) O(1) O(10) O(1) ? O(1)O(100) ? O(1000) O(100) O(1000) O(100) O(100-10 6 ) ? O(1)

23. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Community Gateway Accounts Shift authentication and authorization from RP to the Science Gateway Whole community then appears as “one” user to the RP in terms of authorization –One grid-mapfile and /etc/password entry or perhaps (a mapped set of) virtual machine images –Except accounting and troubleshooting. We still need an individual identifier

24. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 The Proposal Plan for a world where users can be authenticated via their home campus identity management system Enable attribute-based authorization of users by RP site –Allow for user authentication with authorization by community Prototype system in testbed, with involvement of interested parties to work out issues All usage still billed to an allocation –Community or individual

25. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Metrics Metrics of success are commonly requested for government funded programs Successful gateway design will allow principal investigators to highlight gateway usage as well as science accomplishments due to the gateway –Some gateways may set up a mechanism for researchers to cite the use of the gateway in publications Success both in funding the gateway and in requesting TeraGrid resources can be traced to scientific accomplishments and a history of publications

26. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Sample Metrics Collected by ESG The DOE-sponsored Earth System Grid (ESG) project includes a Metrics Service that tracks –logins –file and aggregation downloads –browse and search requests –total volume of activity conducted via its portal. This information is very useful to principal investigators and sponsors in terms of determining the overall impact of the project As ESG begins to utilize TeraGrid resources, it will need to track computational and data services that are delivered to it as a Science Gateway

27. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 NCAR Earth System Grid Science Gateway for climate research –Enabling analysis and understanding gained from global Earth System computational models ESG originally a distributed data management/access system but it has evolved into more. User registration, authorization controls, and metrics tracking CCSM model source, initialization datasets, post-processing codes, and analysis and visualization tools. Prototypes of model- submission environments –Eventually real-time tracking of model status along with references to available output datasets. Expect to see more model runs at higher- resolution and with greater component scope.

28. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006

29. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 TeraGrid Background – 5 min. Gateway integration issues – 15 min. –Accounting GRAM –Security Commsh Attribute-based authentication –Metrics Future work – 10 min. –Gateway primer –Best practices

30. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Science Gateway Primer Primer components –TeraGrid resources and services available to Science Gateways –Requirements for using TeraGrid resources –Best practices when designing a gateway –Software contribution area Wiki-based –Very dynamic development community –Counting on them for contributions –http://www.teragridforum.org/mediawiki

31. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 TeraGrid Resources and Services Compute, data and visualization resources Software –Common TeraGrid Software Stack (CTSS) –Third party applications on a variety of platforms –Community Software Area for user-maintained software –Software packaging and distribution mechanisms Accounting services –developer accounts –community accounts –in the future, dynamic accounts External relations staff available to help publicize successes

32. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Gateway Requirements Additional information to be provided when requesting community accounts –IP address of portal –Data and compute expectations Recommended audit trails for usage tracking Mechanisms to restrict problem jobs

33. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Lots of Best Practices! Thanks Anurag Planning Assess If Gateway-ing Adds Any Value Create a Precise List of Requirements the GW Must Meet Plan for the Long Term (= GW Lifetime) Design Use Formal Design Principles Involve Users in the Design Use Mockups to Perform Usability Testing Design a Focused and Uncluttered UI Implementation Choose Technologies Based on Resources/Time Hire/Use Developers with UI Experience Develop in Stages Use Reusable Components Operation Monitor Gateway Components 24x7 Institute Help Desk ProcessesMonitor & Implement New Technologies Keep Content Current/Relevant Desirable Gateway Characteristics Universal, Secure Access Ability to Personalize Based on Open Standards (JSR 168/286, OGSA, etc.) Use of Modular, Reusable Design (Use Portlets) Use of Technologies With a Rich API/Abstraction Layer Platform Independence (Web, Java, XML, etc.) Rapid Development Capability Ease of Integration into Existing Infrastructure Availability of Workflows Use of Commodity Software Airtight Security Extensibility Maintainability Scalability Extensive Help and documentation

34. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Would development of a gateway help your research? Think about your current bottlenecks –What would you like to explore if only you had Lots of disk Lots of compute resources Powerful analysis capabilities A nice interface to information

35. GCE06, Tampa, FL November 12-13, 2006 Gateways in Tampa Gateway BOF 11/14, 5:30pm rooms 22-23 Gateway talks at many TG booths –http://www.teragrid.org/eot/sc06.html www.teragrid.org Nancy Wilkins-Diehr, wilkinsn@sdsc.eduwilkinsn@sdsc.edu