Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009

2 Application Model 1. Knowledge in one discipline 2. Application within discipline 3. Application across disciplines 4. Application to real-world predictable situations 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situations

3 Challenges Globalization

4 Wal Mart Source: The Post-American World Largest Corporation 8 times Size of Microsoft 2 % of GDP 1.4 Million Employees More Employees than: GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined

5 “China today exports in a single day more than exported in all of 1978.” Source: The Rise of India and China...

6 Savings Rate 1. India -- 25% 2. Japan -- 28% 3. Korea -- 30% 4. China -- 50% 5. United States -- (-4%)

7 U.S. – 2 nd Half of 20 th Century Only Superpower Highest per Capita Income 1 st in Economic Growth 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption Source: National Academy of Science

8 Challenges Globalization Technology

9 Information Technology Processing Processing Communications Communications

10 1983 – A Nation at Risk E-mail Web pages Google iPODs Laptops Digital cameras Doppler radar Cell phones

11 Blogs Wikis Tagging Text messaging MySpace Podcasts PDAs 2000

12 Content Creation & Social Media Facebook MySpace Flickr YouTube Blogs Personal Web Pages

13 SPOT MicrosoftMicrosoft –Citizen –Fossil –Suunco

14

15 SPOT Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard

16 Projection Keyboard

17 Projection Keyboard and Projector

18 Language Translation

19 Translation Goggles

20 Emotiv 16 embedded sensors Detect facial expressions and emotions Push, pull, lift, and drop http://emotiv.com/INDS_3/inds_3.html

21 Bio Technology Biological Science Biological Science Practical Application Practical Application

22 Nano Technology Atom Up Atom Up

23 Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2000

24 Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2009

25 Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2012

26 Elementary Schools 6 Years Integrated Science Biology / ChemistryGrade 7 Biology / PhysicsGrade 8 Physics / ChemistryGrade 9 Integrated ScienceGrades 10 - 12 Source: Ed Week 6/6/07 Chinese Science

27 Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics

28 Start Working End Working Longevity 190020002100 47 62 77 21 62 14 18 107

29 Retirement 55 is not an economically sustainable policy

30 1910 3.0 / 100 Demographics / Economic 1946 4.6 / 100 20101.4 / 100

31 Population of the US (in millions) 68 % 5 8 % 13 % 24 % 14 % 49 % 4 2 20002050

32 Medicare 20049 % 202025 % 204050 %

33 Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics Work

34 Employment 1970’s High Skill Low Skill

35 Employment 1990’s High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill

36 Employment 2010 High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill

37 1970’s 1990’s 2010

38 Industrial Base American Cotton Oil American Steel American Sugar Continental Tobacco Federal Steel General Electric National Lead Pacific Mail People’s Gas Tennessee Coal and Iron 1900

39 Industrial Base General Motors Wal-Mart Exxon Ford General Electric IBM Citigroup AT & T Phillip Morris Boeing 1998

40 Industrial Base Software Aerospace Genomics Bioinformatics Nanotechnology Photonics Micro Material Finance IT Robotics 2010

41 Lexile Framework ® for Reading Study Summary of Text Lexile Measures 600 800 1000 1400 1600 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)

42 Expectations have Changed 20 th Century21st Century 1 – 2 Jobs 10 – 15 Jobs Flexibility And Adaptability Life Long Learners Mastery of One Field Subject Matter Mastery # of Jobs Job Requirements Teaching Model

43 U.S. % of World Scientists / Engineers

44 We need to do what workers abroad cannot do equally well for less money… Forging relationships, tackling novel challenges, synthesizing big picture.

45 Foreign owned companies and foreign- born inventors account for nearly half of U.S. patents (Japan, Korea and Taiwan more than one-fourth) “Innovate America,” Council on Competitiveness Business Reality

46 Workplace Trends Unskilled Unskilled Work to Worker Work to Worker Large to Small Large to Small

47 16 Career Clusters Department of Education

48 Reading Requirements Findings Entry-level Entry-level Highest in 6/16 Highest in 6/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Consistent Across Country Consistent Across Country

49 Human Services

50 Construction

51 Manufacturing

52 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Iowa 77 % Florida 71 % Massachusetts 48 % California 48 % South Carolina 35 %

53 Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 %189 Texas 81 %190 Iowa 77 %197 Florida 71 %202 Massachusetts 48 %234 California 48 %210 South Carolina 35 %228

54 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 % Wisconsin 86 % Iowa 72 % Florida 44 % California 39 % South Carolina 30 %

55 Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 %217 Wisconsin 86 %229 Iowa 72 %250 Florida 44 %265 California 39 %262 South Carolina 30 %276

56 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 % Texas 82 % Wisconsin 74 % Michigan 73 % Florida 63 % California 51 % South Carolina 39 % Massachusetts 39 %

57 Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 %203 Texas 82 %219 Wisconsin 74 %225 Michigan 73 %222 Florida 63 %230 California 51 %231 South Carolina 39 %246 Massachusetts 39 %255

58 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 % Iowa 76 % Wisconsin 75 % Michigan 61 % Florida 58 % Massachusetts 42 % South Carolina 24 %

59 Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 %247 Iowa 76 %262 Wisconsin 75 %263 Michigan 61 %269 Florida 58 %269 Massachusetts 42 %301 South Carolina 24 %305

60 Improving Student Performance in Times of Declining Resources

61 Bases of ICLE Position International Center with Nation’s most Successful Schools Funding Student Learning – Report States –Florida –New Jersey

62 Framework Vs. Index

63 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost

64 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

65 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst

66 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB High Cost High Performance Low Cost High Performance Low Cost Low Performance High Cost Low Performance

67 Example Class Size –25 to 24 –4 % increase –Payroll Equals 80 % –Total Cost = 3.2 % of Budget Professional Development

68 Ohio English Language Arts Learning Standards Tested

69 Levels CDCDABABCDCDABAB 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 3 2 1 Bloom’s Application

70 Gold Seal Lessons

71 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Focused Professional Development Reduce Class Size

72 Empower Staff

73 1. Team of teachers

74 Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students

75 Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance

76 Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable)

77 Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable) 5. Give % of savings if student performance improves

78 Successful Examples 1.Teachers in teams with a group of students --- They get 50% of reduced cost if students maintain student performance. If they dramatically improve student performance they get 80% of reduced cost

79 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Teacher-Designed Program X X Existing Program

80 Examples 1. Department Chairs

81 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Interdisciplinary Chairs

82 Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping

83 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Looping

84 Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping 3.Electives to 9 th Grade

85 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Electives to 9 th Grade

86 Technology

87 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance I CAN Learn

88 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance READ 180

89 Examples Coordinate Professional Development with Graduate Degrees

90 Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)

91 Cost of Graduate Programs 1.Temple University -$573 per credit hour ($837 out of state) 2. State University of New York at Albany -$338 per credit hour ($573 out of state) 3.RPI - $1,285 per credit hour

92 Online and Best Practices course 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of $450 = $60 per day compared to: - $1,014 - $3,855 per course for Graduate Credit - Cost of Professional Development Day $36,000 per year/180 days = $200 per day

93 Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices

94 Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities

95 Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel

96 Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel Cost savings to teachers and district PLUS best practices tied to district priorities

97 Relevant and Cost Effective for Teachers Relevant and Cost Effective for District

98 Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Online Graduate Course X X Traditional Professional Development

99 WHY - WHAT - HOW

100 1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY 12148 Phone (518) 399-2776 Fax (518) 399-7607 E-mail - info@LeaderEd.com www.LeaderEd.com International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.


Download ppt "International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google