Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWillis Peters Modified over 9 years ago
1
International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the 21 st Century February 27, 2009
2
Application Model 1. Knowledge in one discipline 2. Application within discipline 3. Application across disciplines 4. Application to real-world predictable situations 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situations
3
Challenges Globalization
4
Wal Mart Source: The Post-American World Largest Corporation 8 times Size of Microsoft 2 % of GDP 1.4 Million Employees More Employees than: GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined
5
“China today exports in a single day more than exported in all of 1978.” Source: The Rise of India and China...
6
Savings Rate 1. India -- 25% 2. Japan -- 28% 3. Korea -- 30% 4. China -- 50% 5. United States -- (-4%)
7
U.S. – 2 nd Half of 20 th Century Only Superpower Highest per Capita Income 1 st in Economic Growth 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption Source: National Academy of Science
8
Challenges Globalization Technology
9
Information Technology Processing Processing Communications Communications
10
1983 – A Nation at Risk E-mail Web pages Google iPODs Laptops Digital cameras Doppler radar Cell phones
11
Blogs Wikis Tagging Text messaging MySpace Podcasts PDAs 2000
12
Content Creation & Social Media Facebook MySpace Flickr YouTube Blogs Personal Web Pages
13
SPOT MicrosoftMicrosoft –Citizen –Fossil –Suunco
15
SPOT Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
16
Projection Keyboard
17
Projection Keyboard and Projector
18
Language Translation
19
Translation Goggles
20
Emotiv 16 embedded sensors Detect facial expressions and emotions Push, pull, lift, and drop http://emotiv.com/INDS_3/inds_3.html
21
Bio Technology Biological Science Biological Science Practical Application Practical Application
22
Nano Technology Atom Up Atom Up
23
Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2000
24
Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2009
25
Info Tech Nano Tech Bio Tech 2012
26
Elementary Schools 6 Years Integrated Science Biology / ChemistryGrade 7 Biology / PhysicsGrade 8 Physics / ChemistryGrade 9 Integrated ScienceGrades 10 - 12 Source: Ed Week 6/6/07 Chinese Science
27
Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics
28
Start Working End Working Longevity 190020002100 47 62 77 21 62 14 18 107
29
Retirement 55 is not an economically sustainable policy
30
1910 3.0 / 100 Demographics / Economic 1946 4.6 / 100 20101.4 / 100
31
Population of the US (in millions) 68 % 5 8 % 13 % 24 % 14 % 49 % 4 2 20002050
32
Medicare 20049 % 202025 % 204050 %
33
Challenges Technology Globalization Demographics Work
34
Employment 1970’s High Skill Low Skill
35
Employment 1990’s High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill
36
Employment 2010 High Skill Low Skill Semi Skill
37
1970’s 1990’s 2010
38
Industrial Base American Cotton Oil American Steel American Sugar Continental Tobacco Federal Steel General Electric National Lead Pacific Mail People’s Gas Tennessee Coal and Iron 1900
39
Industrial Base General Motors Wal-Mart Exxon Ford General Electric IBM Citigroup AT & T Phillip Morris Boeing 1998
40
Industrial Base Software Aerospace Genomics Bioinformatics Nanotechnology Photonics Micro Material Finance IT Robotics 2010
41
Lexile Framework ® for Reading Study Summary of Text Lexile Measures 600 800 1000 1400 1600 1200 Text Lexile Measure (L) High School Literature College Literature High School Textbooks College Textbooks Military Personal Use Entry-Level Occupations SAT 1, ACT, AP* * Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
42
Expectations have Changed 20 th Century21st Century 1 – 2 Jobs 10 – 15 Jobs Flexibility And Adaptability Life Long Learners Mastery of One Field Subject Matter Mastery # of Jobs Job Requirements Teaching Model
43
U.S. % of World Scientists / Engineers
44
We need to do what workers abroad cannot do equally well for less money… Forging relationships, tackling novel challenges, synthesizing big picture.
45
Foreign owned companies and foreign- born inventors account for nearly half of U.S. patents (Japan, Korea and Taiwan more than one-fourth) “Innovate America,” Council on Competitiveness Business Reality
46
Workplace Trends Unskilled Unskilled Work to Worker Work to Worker Large to Small Large to Small
47
16 Career Clusters Department of Education
48
Reading Requirements Findings Entry-level Entry-level Highest in 6/16 Highest in 6/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Second Highest in 7/16 Consistent Across Country Consistent Across Country
49
Human Services
50
Construction
51
Manufacturing
52
Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 % Texas 81 % Iowa 77 % Florida 71 % Massachusetts 48 % California 48 % South Carolina 35 %
53
Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficiency Grade 4 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score Wisconsin 83 %189 Texas 81 %190 Iowa 77 %197 Florida 71 %202 Massachusetts 48 %234 California 48 %210 South Carolina 35 %228
54
Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 % Wisconsin 86 % Iowa 72 % Florida 44 % California 39 % South Carolina 30 %
55
Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficiency Grade 8 Reading Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 88 %217 Wisconsin 86 %229 Iowa 72 %250 Florida 44 %265 California 39 %262 South Carolina 30 %276
56
Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 % Texas 82 % Wisconsin 74 % Michigan 73 % Florida 63 % California 51 % South Carolina 39 % Massachusetts 39 %
57
Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 4 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 91 %203 Texas 82 %219 Wisconsin 74 %225 Michigan 73 %222 Florida 63 %230 California 51 %231 South Carolina 39 %246 Massachusetts 39 %255
58
Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 % Iowa 76 % Wisconsin 75 % Michigan 61 % Florida 58 % Massachusetts 42 % South Carolina 24 %
59
Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficiency Grade 8 Mathematics Proficient Required NAEP Score North Carolina 84 %247 Iowa 76 %262 Wisconsin 75 %263 Michigan 61 %269 Florida 58 %269 Massachusetts 42 %301 South Carolina 24 %305
60
Improving Student Performance in Times of Declining Resources
61
Bases of ICLE Position International Center with Nation’s most Successful Schools Funding Student Learning – Report States –Florida –New Jersey
62
Framework Vs. Index
63
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost
64
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst
65
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB EfEffecfecttivenessivenessEfEffecfecttivenessivenesst
66
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance CDCDABABCDCDABAB High Cost High Performance Low Cost High Performance Low Cost Low Performance High Cost Low Performance
67
Example Class Size –25 to 24 –4 % increase –Payroll Equals 80 % –Total Cost = 3.2 % of Budget Professional Development
68
Ohio English Language Arts Learning Standards Tested
69
Levels CDCDABABCDCDABAB 1 2 3 4 5 4 5 6 3 2 1 Bloom’s Application
70
Gold Seal Lessons
71
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Focused Professional Development Reduce Class Size
72
Empower Staff
73
1. Team of teachers
74
Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students
75
Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance
76
Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable)
77
Empower Staff 1. Team of teachers 2.Given group of students 3.Agree to their present performance 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable) 5. Give % of savings if student performance improves
78
Successful Examples 1.Teachers in teams with a group of students --- They get 50% of reduced cost if students maintain student performance. If they dramatically improve student performance they get 80% of reduced cost
79
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Teacher-Designed Program X X Existing Program
80
Examples 1. Department Chairs
81
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Interdisciplinary Chairs
82
Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping
83
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Looping
84
Examples 1. Department Chairs 2.Looping 3.Electives to 9 th Grade
85
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Electives to 9 th Grade
86
Technology
87
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance I CAN Learn
88
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance READ 180
89
Examples Coordinate Professional Development with Graduate Degrees
90
Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)
91
Cost of Graduate Programs 1.Temple University -$573 per credit hour ($837 out of state) 2. State University of New York at Albany -$338 per credit hour ($573 out of state) 3.RPI - $1,285 per credit hour
92
Online and Best Practices course 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of $450 = $60 per day compared to: - $1,014 - $3,855 per course for Graduate Credit - Cost of Professional Development Day $36,000 per year/180 days = $200 per day
93
Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices
94
Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities
95
Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel
96
Online and Best Practices 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours) Cost of course $450 = $60 per day Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their practices Based on district priorities No travel Cost savings to teachers and district PLUS best practices tied to district priorities
97
Relevant and Cost Effective for Teachers Relevant and Cost Effective for District
98
Efficient and Effective Framework High Cost Low Cost High Student Performance Low Student Performance Online Graduate Course X X Traditional Professional Development
99
WHY - WHAT - HOW
100
1587 Route 146 Rexford, NY 12148 Phone (518) 399-2776 Fax (518) 399-7607 E-mail - info@LeaderEd.com www.LeaderEd.com International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.