1. State of the Marine Transportation System International Maritime Statistics Forum Singapore 16 Apr 2007

2. National Challenge: Marine Transportation System  Value of all foreign trade represents nearly 30% of nation’s GDP (vs. 13% in 1970)  Overseas waterborne trade  95% of overseas trade by volume  75% of overseas trade by value  16 million jobs  About $2.3 trillion in economic activity  System nearing capacity  Cargo volumes projected to double by 2025  Already a generation behind in channel design – but West Coast in better shape  Capacity constraints increase transportation costs, pollution, congestion

3. U.S. Harbors and Waterways: Vital to Trade …and to Our National Economy Million Tons Over 100 50 - 100 25 - 50 10 - 25 Houston Corpus Christi S. Louisiana New Orleans Baton Rouge Texas City Lake Charles Plaquemines Tampa New York/NJ Valdez Long Beach Beaumont Norfolk Lower Delaware River (9 harbors) Duluth/Superior Los Angeles Port Arthur St. Louis Portland Seattle Freeport Huntington Richmond Oakland Tacoma Boston Newport News Port Everglades Jacksonville Memphis Detroit Cleveland Savannah Charleston Indiana Hbr Cincinnati Portland Two Harbors Anacortes Honolulu Chicago Pittsburgh Baltimore Pascagoula 55 harbors – coastal, inland, Great Lakes - handled over 10 million tons each in 2005… Ashtabula Mobile New Haven Matagorda Nearly 12,000 Miles 9 ft & Over 196 Lock Sites / 241 Chambers Moving Over 600 Million Tons About 2/3rds Cost of Rail and 1/10 Cost of Truck Inland Waterway System: Presque Isle Toledo Providence Kalama

4. Future of North American Container Trade with Asia (Thousands of TEUs) Asia-North America eastbound flows likely passed 6 million TEU in ‘06 Driven by People’s Republic of China to U.S. West Coast May reach 28 million TEU by 2022 Huge challenge to U.S. ports to handle this volume Source: Global Insight, Jun 04.

5. Deep Draft Challenges: Mega- ships “EMMA MAERSK” - 11,000+ TEUs Announced capacity 11,000 TEUs (But industry analysts say could range much higher.) Entered service Sep 06, 10 more on order Length 1,303 ft – (longer than Eiffel Tower is tall) Width 184 ft) – (wide enough to cover 14 freeway lanes) Height 207 ft – (taller than a 17 storey building) Loaded draft 51 feet Los Angeles and Norfolk only US ports that could handle and Norfolk only at high tide Announced capacity 11,000 TEUs (But industry analysts say could range much higher.) Entered service Sep 06, 10 more on order Length 1,303 ft – (longer than Eiffel Tower is tall) Width 184 ft) – (wide enough to cover 14 freeway lanes) Height 207 ft – (taller than a 17 storey building) Loaded draft 51 feet Los Angeles and Norfolk only US ports that could handle and Norfolk only at high tide

6. Pacific Coast 4.5 3.8 14.0 Atlantic Coast 7.4 5.1 17.7 Depth-Constrained Containership Calls in 2020, with and without Planned Harbor Projects (in thousands of ship calls) Under Construction Under Study Under Construction/ Study for Additional Improvements Harbor Projects in 2006: Gulf Coast 1.11.6 2.5

7. Meeting the Challenge: Key Harbor Improvement Projects Funded in 06 Houston/ Galveston Mobile New York/NJ Lwr Delaware R Los Angeles Main Channel Oakland 50-ft Boston Port Everglades Jacksonville Brunswick Indiana Hbr Canaveral Sault Ste Marie (Soo Locks) Pascagoula (multiple projects) Wilmington DeLong Mtn Hbr Savannah Nawiliwili Kaumalapau Great Lakes System Study Corpus Christi (Main Chnl & LaQuinta Chnl) Calcasieu R. James R Ventura Construction / Design Funds Study Funds Under Construction/ Study for Additional Improvements Texas City SF Bay to Stockton Columbia R Norfolk St. Paul Hbr Kawaihae Lake Washington St Petersburg Freeport Matagorda Iberia Anchorage Haines Homer Unalaska Searsport Tampa Gulfport  25 key deep draft harbor improvements in ’06 appropriation  About $300 million  Long-term investment of over $4 billion Nome Sand Pt. Yakutat Redwood City Brazos Island Hbr. Sabine- Neches

8. Coastal and Inland River Information Service Inter-Agency Initiative International Maritime Statistics Forum Singapore 16 Apr 2007 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

9. Introduction Numerous Real-time electronic transmission of data between navigation locks and industry is beginning to happen.Numerous Real-time electronic transmission of data between navigation locks and industry is beginning to happen. Numerous Federal agencies have a responsibility for the collection and dissemination of domestic navigation information.Numerous Federal agencies have a responsibility for the collection and dissemination of domestic navigation information. An Industry and Federal Government partnership is required.An Industry and Federal Government partnership is required. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

10. Domestic Federal Navigation Data Requirements FEDERAL DOD CORPSTRANSCOM DHS USCGCBP DOT MARADBTSSLSDC DOA USDA DOC NOAA U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Departments DOD – Department of Defense DHS – Department of Homeland Security DOT – Department of Transportation DOA – Department of Agriculture DOC – Department of Commerce Agencies CORPS – Army Corps TRANSCOM - United States Transportation Command USCG – United States Coast Guard CBP – Customs and Border Protection MARAD – Maritime Administration BTS – Bureau of Transportation Statistics SLSDC – St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation USDA – U.S. Department of Agriculture NOAA – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

11. Current Initiatives Automated Identification Service (AIS): USCGAutomated Identification Service (AIS): USCG BargEx: IndustryBargEx: Industry RiverNet: Port of Pittsburgh/CorpsRiverNet: Port of Pittsburgh/Corps Real Time Current Velocity (RTCV): Corps/USCGReal Time Current Velocity (RTCV): Corps/USCG Regional Transportation Security System Coalitions (RTSC)/Portland: Industry/TSARegional Transportation Security System Coalitions (RTSC)/Portland: Industry/TSA Locks Visibility Mgmt Systems (LVMS): CorpsLocks Visibility Mgmt Systems (LVMS): Corps Mississippi State University/Oakridge National Laboratory Grant (MSU/ONL): DOTMississippi State University/Oakridge National Laboratory Grant (MSU/ONL): DOT Lock Performance Monitoring System (LPMS), Operations & Maintenance of Navigation Installations (OMNI): CorpsLock Performance Monitoring System (LPMS), Operations & Maintenance of Navigation Installations (OMNI): Corps Vessel Tracking System (VTS) for Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDC’s): Corps/USCGVessel Tracking System (VTS) for Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDC’s): Corps/USCG SMART Lock: Port of PittsburghSMART Lock: Port of Pittsburgh U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

12. Present Situation Numerous alternatives related to electronic navigation dataNumerous alternatives related to electronic navigation data –WiFi vs. VHF –Kinematic vs. Differential GPS –Vector vs. Raster Inland Elec Nav Charts –Data storage/retrieval U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

13. Inland Navigation Data Operational dataOperational data –Electronic Navigation Charts –Lock condition (availability, queue) –Real time current and wind velocities –River stage, water releases Statistical dataStatistical data –Lock activity and vessel activity at lock –Tow sizes –Commodities –Tonnage –Origin and destination of towboat, barge, commodity, and container U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

14. Industry Issues Concern for numerous initiatives and developing Federal requirements with perceived minimal interagency coordinationConcern for numerous initiatives and developing Federal requirements with perceived minimal interagency coordination Industry wants to see Federal standards developedIndustry wants to see Federal standards developed Industry concerned with protection of proprietary informationIndustry concerned with protection of proprietary information An Industry and Government partnership is required.An Industry and Government partnership is required. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

15. Coastal & River Information Services (CRIS) Integrates and leverages current initiatives Borrows concepts from EU’s River Information Services Classifies data by:  Input – What’s collected  Transmittal - Services to Mariners  Needs Based on a Public-Private Partnership U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

16. CRIS Data and Information Process Information and Data Requirements Existing Systems CMTS Technology IAT NOT NEEDED Data Gaps CMTS Data IAT FilledNeeded Missing Eliminate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

17. Next Steps for CRIS Use the U.S.Use the U.S. Committee on the Marine Transportation System (CMTS) for interagency coordination Create Interagency/Industry product delivery team (PDT)Create Interagency/Industry product delivery team (PDT) Partnership with industry via PDTPartnership with industry via PDT –MTSNAC, IWUB, AWO, IWC Identify requirementsIdentify requirements Harmonize Federal data definitions for domestic dataHarmonize Federal data definitions for domestic data Establish one Federal set of standards for industry reportingEstablish one Federal set of standards for industry reporting Align with International and Inter-modal standardsAlign with International and Inter-modal standards Coordinate with Federal international effortsCoordinate with Federal international efforts –ITDS, WCO U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

18. Subscribers (WHO) Subscribers Long Term Solution Technology –GPS –Standardized Electronic Data –Data Provided by Industry Databases Partnerships –Federal Government –Associations –Industry –Service Provider Result –Geographically accurate, timely, consistent and complete data. Industry Incentive –Fleet Management Tool –First In Line –Reduced IWFT & HMF –Free Equipment U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Service Provider GPS (WHERE & WHEN) Industry (WHAT) Origin Destination Lock Reporting Point