2. SAKAI UPDATE MICHAEL KORCUSKA March 17, 2009. Nagoya, Japan

3. About Sakai

4. Sakai History Courseware Management System Started in 2004 Michigan, Indiana, Stanford, MIT (and Berkeley) Mellon Foundation Grant 2.6 release in QA

5. Why Start Sakai? 5 Schools with Homegrown CMS Inefficient to build 5 systems Wanted to maintain control Experts in teaching and learning Desire to work together and share knowledge

6. Why Sakai?  Stanford wrote about 20% of the original code in Sakai. What we have received in return is five times what we have put in, a tremendous return on investment. The value of community source is very real to us. Lois Brooks Director of Academic Computing Stanford University Lois Brooks Director of Academic Computing Stanford University Coursework, Stanford University

7. Defining Sakai: Product Scope COURSE MANAGEMENT — all the tools of a modern course management system. RESEARCH & COLLABORATION — project sites for research and work group collaboration. SAKAIBRARY — Library-led component to add citations directly into Sakai. PORTFOLIOS — Open Source Portfolio (OSP) is a core part of Sakai. Course Management Portfolios Sakaibrary Research & Collaboration

8. Defining Sakai: Community COMPOSITION — educational institutions & commercial enterprises working in partnership with standards bodies & other open- source initiatives. GOALS — work collaboratively to develop innovative software applications designed to enhance teaching, learning, research & collaboration in education. VALUES — knowledge sharing, information transparency, meritocracy. Educational Institutions Commercial Affiliates Open Source Standards Bodies Standards Bodies

9. Sakai on the ground 200+ PRODUCTION/PILOT DEPLOYMENTS: From 200 to 200,000 users

10. Sakai on the ground  5 of top 10 Universities run Sakai  Stanford  Berkeley  Cambridge  Columbia  Oxford  #11 also runs Sakai (Yale)

11. Sakai on the ground UsersInstitutions 130,000+Indiana, UNISA 60,000+Michigan 11,000 - 50,000 Berkeley, Cape Town, Etudes Consortium, New England (AU), Valencia, Virginia Tech, Yale 1,000 - 10,000 Cambridge, Cerritos, Charles Sturt, Fernando Pessoa, Lleida, Mount Holyoke, North-West, Rice, Roskilde, Rutgers, Saginaw Valley, UC Merced, Whitman, Arteveldehogeschool CTOOLS, University of Michigan First production Sakai deployment, 2004

12. Defining Sakai: Code OPEN LICENSING — Sakai’s software is made available under the terms of the ECL, a variant of the Apache license. The ECL encourages a wide range of use, including commercial use. NO FEES OR ROYALTIES — Sakai is free to acquire, use, copy, modify, merge, publish, redistribute & sublicense for any purpose provided our copyright notice & disclaimer are included. NO “COPYLEFT” RESTRICTIONS — unlike GPL redistributed derivative works are neither required to adopt the Sakai license nor publish the source code as open-source. EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY LICENSE (ECL)

13. Increasing Global Diversity In 2006, 81% were in North America

14. Defining Sakai: Foundation  MISSION — manage & protect intellectual property; provide basic infrastructure & small staff; help coordinate design, development, testing & distribution of software; champion open source & open standards.  GOVERNANCE — ten board members elected by member reps to serve three-year terms; Executive Director manages day-to-day operations.  PARTNERS — over 100 member organizations contribute $10K per year ($5K for smaller institutions).  BUDGET — funds 4-6 staffers, admin services, computing infrastructure, project coordination, conferences, Sakai Fellows Program, advocacy & outreach activities.

15. Why Sakai?  UCT decided to move to open source in 2004, migrating from WebCT & a home-grown system. Open source offers the advantages of flexibility & avoids the risks of vendor lock-in & escalating license costs. We were attracted to Sakai by the size & expertise of the community around it. Stephen Marquard, Learning Technologies Coordinator, University of Cape Town

16. Why Sakai 3?  Changing expectations  Google docs/apps, Social Networking, Web 2.0  Success of project sites = Sakai beyond courses  New technologies  Standards-based, open source projects JCR (Jackrabbit) Open Social (Shindig)  Client-side programming JavaScript/AJAX

17. Sakai 3 Themes Content Authoring and Management Academic Networking Breaking the Site Boundary Academic Workflows, not (just) Tools Sakai, Thick or ThinSakai Everywhere

18. Content  Content Basics:  Simple page creation (wiki- like)  WYSIWG Editing  Template-based authoring  Versioning  Interactive Widgets  Everything is content  Searchable, linkable, portable  Unified content repository

19. Sakai 2 Site A Site B Finding something requires knowing which site it belongs to. ? ?

20. Tags: System, Organizational & User Search + Smart Folders Sakai 3

21. Academic Networking  Academic Networking  People are important, but “friends” aren’t enough  Content-based – Who is reading the same articles?  Activity based – Who has taken the same classes?

22. Sakai 2: Users & Sites Site A Site B Group A1 User 1 User 2 User 3 User 4 User 5. User N Group B1 User 1 User 2 User 3 User 4 User 5. User N Users and groups exist within the context of a site.

23.  Groups & Sites (call them spaces?) Separated Member of a group – People with something in common Access to a space – Collection of content & functionality Support for hierarchy Sakai 3 Groups & Sites Space A Space B Space C Group 2 Group 3 Group 1 Group 1.1 Space AA Space AB Group 1.2

24. Kernel Tool Sakai 2 Architecture Kernel Service Facilitates independent tool development Resists intuitive workflows Contributes to inconsistent user experience Kernel

25. Sakai 3 Architecture Kernel Workflow Kernel Service Kernel Workflows built across services Encourages presentation & service separation Services need to respond to more customers UX oversight is more complicated

26. Academic Workflow  Beyond Tool Silos  Academic work flows often cross tool boundaries Anything can be graded! Anything can be discussed!  This is beginning to appear in Sakai 2 But more needs to be done  Example: Instructor puts into syllabus an assignment to create a discussion post that will be graded.  4 tools for both instructors and students!

27. Academic Workflow Example WeekReadingsActivities & Assignments 1Course Policies Textbook Chapter 1 2Textbook Chapter 2 Jackson Article Write a response to Jackson article & post to discussion forum Create Assignment… Name: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 Points: 10 (of 150) Type: Individual Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Link To: Select... Create CancelAdvanced Options… Select text & click “Create Assignment” Edit Assignment Information Link to Something All Media Images Videos Audio Forums Tests Site Pages Polls Choose New… Forums Jackson Response Forum (3 posts) Class Intro Forum (27 posts) Some Other Forum (0 posts)

28. Student View WeekReadingsActivities & Assignments 1Course Policies Textbook Chapter 1 2Textbook Chapter 2 Jackson Article Write a response to Jackson article & post to discussion forum Assignment: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 ( due tomorrow) Status: Not submitted Points: 10 possible (of 150). Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more… Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (Create Post…)

29. Student View, Graded WeekReadingsActivities & Assignments 1Course Policies Textbook Chapter 1 2Textbook Chapter 2 Jackson Article Write a response to Jackson article & post to discussion forum Assignment: Jackson Reading Response Due Date: September 10, 2009 (due date passed) Status: Submitted and Graded Points: 9/10 (of 150). View feedback Description: Respond to the Jackson article in no more than 500 words. Post that response to the class discussion forum. Read more… Link(s): Jackson Response Discussion Forum (go to Forum now)

30. Sakai, Thick or Thin  Multiple Configurations  Sakai as CMS  Sakai as Collaboration System  Sakai as Portfolio System  Sakai Integrations  Google Applications  Social Networks (Open Social, Facebook)

31. Sakai Everywhere

32. http://3akai.sakaifoundation.org Sakai 3 Demo

34. Sakai 3 Technology Goals  Scalability  Remove bottlenecks from Sakai 2  Improve cluster support  Developer Productivity  Faster builds  UX & back-end development separated  Code Quality & Maintenance  Reliance on other open source efforts  Increase unit testing  Easier to install/build  To improve initial experience for new developers

35. JCR as Content Store  Standards-based  JSR 170  Ships with Apache Jackrabbit, but can be changed  Everything as content  Discussion post, User profile information, etc.  Components put Content into JCR Content store  Sakai Kernel creates relational indices in DB Component doesn’t need to do anything Automatic tracking of most events by kernel

36. JSON  Sakai Kernel supports JSON microformat  Components use REST calls to interact with Kernel  Again, standards based  JAX-RS currently in Kernel (JSR 311)  Benefits  Back-end services stay Java-based  UX programmers more often skilled in JavaScript Easier UX developers can work on Sakai  Tools like GWT can be used for Java-based UI  Components can be written using other languages

37. Sakai 3 Participation  K2 Working Group  http://groups.google.com/group/sakai-kernel  UX Design Work  UX list  http://groups.google.com/group/3akai  How would you like to be involved?  Development Java & JavaScript  Design Conceptual, interaction and visual

38. When  Q1 2009: Sakai 2.6  Q3 2009: Sakai 2.6.#  A maintenance release for fall production  2010  Q1: Sakai 2.7 (New assignments tool and gradebook?)  Later: First versions of Sakai 3 Not functionally equivalent to 2.7 Suitable for new adoptions “Hybrid” version for existing Sakai schools  2011  Sakai 3 as full replacement  Maintenance releases for Sakai 2.7 through 2013  No version 2.8

39. ありがとうございました