1. Hobbes, Leviathan Leaving the State of Nature PHIL 2345 2008-09

2. Hobbes’s Leviathan: full-size title page

3. Reasons to cooperate/leave SoN/SoW (ch. 13) equality of hope & ability –i.e. everyone can hurt everyone else –We know there is relative equality b/c otherwise one superior man or group would rule –Civil laws introduce inequality; anti-Aristotelian, no natural hierarchy (ch. 15) fear, danger of violent death own judge/executioner rt. to each other's bodies material deprivations no sociability w/out a power to awe

4. Why do we exit? Our Passions— –Caveat: even if one is not personally seeking domination, the conditions of Son/SoW force him to acts of aggression. Fear of death; –Is this a true Prisoner’s Dilemma? –Death is the consequence of remaining in the SoN; Desire for comfort, safety, security, a long life, care for the family—’conjugal’ passion; Life otherwise nasty, brutish, short; Hope to obtain it (would we have hope?).

5. Transfer of Right (ch. 14) ‘Right is layd aside, either by simply Renouncing it; or by Transferring it to another’; ‘in consideration of some Right reciprocally transferred to himselfe; or for some other good…’. Simply renouncing: does not care to whom Transferring: benefit intended to certain person(s) Obliged not to hinder those to whom he has transferred it.

6. A valid Covenant? Mere trust in future performance is not enough—such a Covenant is void; Future fulfillment cannot be counted on; Force is required –to reign in men’s passions (which can include ‘conjugal’ passion—care for one’s family) Cannot promise that which is impossible Can be freed from obligation: ‘Forgiven’.

7. Impossible Covenants With animals With God, except by mediation of his spokespersons (but on what grounds do we believe them?) Social animals (bees, ants) don’t need Covenants; we do Aristotle was wrong.

8. Conditions of Compact: Unconditional covenant of every one w/ every one; no exceptions/free riders: –'This is more than Consent, or Concord; it is a reall Unitie of them all, in one and the same Person, made by Covenant of every man with every man...‘ (ch. 17). Duress allowed? –natural law permits covenants concluded on the basis of fear: 'Covenants entred into by fear, in the condition of meer Nature, are obligatory' and enforced by fear of reprisal (ch. 14; also ch. 18) –E.g. agreeing to pay a ransom—it is a ‘Contract’, life in exchange for money; ‘bound to pay it until Civill Law discharge me’; –dissenters may be pressed into agreement on the grounds that they signalled their acquiescence by entering the Assembly (ch. 18).

9. Motivation to comply Third Law of Nature: –‘That men performe their Covenants made’ (ch. 15); Yet ‘force of Words’ is too weak What are motivations to comply? –active awareness of the consequences of our actions: –either fear of the consequences of breaking their word, or –pride “in appearing not to need to breake it” (ch. 15) –foresight: men restrain their passions out of ‘foresight of their own preservation, and of a more contented life thereby’ (ch. 17) Duress may also be used—legitimately! But cannot be forced to accuse oneself, to not resist arrest, punishment.

10. The Sovereign Sovereign = Artificial Man (see ch. 16) –‘A Multitude of men are made One Person, when they are by one man, or one Person, Represented –Multitude = multiple authors of what representative does Sovereign = reduction of multiple wills to ‘one Man, or... one Assembly of men, that may reduce all their Wills, by plurality of voices, unto one Will...to appoint one man, or Assembly of men, to beare their Person’ (ch. 17); Sovereign acts as agent of all: –‘every one to... acknowledge himselfe to be Author of whatsoever he that so beareth their Person, shall Act’ –Majority = voice of multitude (ch. 16). - Sovereign acts for ‘the Common Peace and Safetie’

11. Sovereign power (ch. 18) Each is obliged to others to be author of what Sovereign does Hence no breach possible by Sovereign No subject may be freed from obligation to obey; No man who has Sovereign power may be put to death (against regicide of Charles I) Agreement of each w/ each, not of each w/ Sovereign—no Kingship on condition; Dissenters/free riders not allowed; must enter Covenant w/ the rest.

12. What is Leviathan? A sea monster representing evil and the forces of chaos (The Bible, Job, 13-29): –Many-headed, scaly, fire-breathing; –Why would Hobbes select this for the title? ‘that great Leviathan, called a commonwealth or state (in Latin civitas) which is but an artificial man…and in which the sovereignty is an artificial soul’. ‘a real unitie of them all’ (ch. 17). Sovereign may use force to enforce the compact: –'Covenants without the Sword, are but Words‘; –men require ‘a Common Power, to keep them in awe, and to direct their actions to the Common Benefit’ (ch. 17)

13. Hobbes’s Sovereign, or ‘Leviathan’

14. Question Hobbes claims that it is rationally in one's best interests to keep one's covenants /contracts/compacts, because those who don't keep them must be cast out of society. However, is this true of everyone? Is it true of every individual contract? Can Hobbes give other reasons for keeping one's word and self-interest always coinciding?