Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosalind Hill Modified over 9 years ago
1
EuropeAid 1 Update on delegated cooperation 11 th June 2010 EuropeAid Cooperation Office Jean-Hervé Ramat
2
EuropeAid 2 Summary 1 Definitions 2 Delegation agreement prerequisites 3 “6 pillar compliance” 4 Figures
3
EuropeAid 3 Definitions (1) Management of funds entrusted by the European Commission to delegated body from Member States (or other third donor country) under indirect centralised management mode → DELEGATION AGREEMENT Management of funds entrusted to the European Commission by EU Member States, International Organisations and other public donors → TRANSFER AGREEMENT
4
EuropeAid 4 Definitions (2) In both cases, the expression "Delegated cooperation" is used For a transfer agreement, the main “constraint” is to anticipate, because the amount has to be taken into account in the Commission financing decision (and in the relevant Action fiche) For a delegation agreement, there are also several prerequisites (in addition to being mentioned in the relevant Action fiche)
5
EuropeAid 5 Delegation agreement - prerequisites (1) a)To be a national public-sector bodies or bodies governed by private law with a public-service mission b)To be « 6 pillar compliant » (according to the Financial Regulation for EU General Budget / 10th EDF) c)To comply with the following operational criteria
6
EuropeAid 6 Delegation agreement - prerequisites (2) i.Bodies from Member States (EU 27); ii.which operate at a national or federal level (i.e. no regional or local authorities); iii.which are specialised in technical or financial development cooperation with beneficiary countries of EC external assistance; iv.which implement cooperation activities without subcontracting entire programmes or projects to other entities
7
EuropeAid 7 Delegation agreement - prerequisites (3) There are approximately 42 EU entities could be potential eligible partners for indirect centralised management agreements under the above criteria; Donors from non EU third countries (such as the US, Canada, Japan, etc.), which are also interested in engaging in indirect centralised management with the Commission, should only be accepted in exceptional cases and when justified;
8
EuropeAid 8 6 pillar compliance (1) 1.Expression of interest by the donor’s body 2.Initial screening by EuropeAid services 3.External audit to assess the "existence and proper operation" on the following “6 pillars” a. transparent procurement and grant-award procedures; b. an effective internal control system for management of operations; c. accounting system that enables the correct use of EU funds d. an independent external audit; e. public access to information at the level provided for in Community regulations; f. adequate annual ex post publication of beneficiaries of funds deriving from the budget
9
EuropeAid 9 6 pillar compliance (2) 12 organisations assessed and considered compliant (some with additional assessment to be carried out within 12 months) o Agence Française de Dévelopement (AFD) o Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GTZ) o Stichting Outwikkeling Nederlandse Antillen (SONA) o Cooperation Technique Belge (BTC/CTB) o Austrian Development Agency (ADA) o Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) o UK Department for International Development (DFID) o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Netherlands (NL) o Instituto Portugues de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento (IPAD) o Lux-Development SA (LU) o Ministry of Foreign Affairs Finland (FI) o Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DANIDA)
10
EuropeAid 10 6 pillar compliance (3) ongoing assessments for 7 other organisations: o France Coopération Internationale (FCI) o Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) o Societa Italiana per le Imprese al'Estero (SIMEST) o Deutscher Entwicklungsdienst GmbH (DED) o Agencia Espanola de Cooperation Internacional al Desarrollo (AECID) o Australian Development Agency (AusAID) o British Council
11
EuropeAid 11 Figures A.Delegation agreements 1.Signed (by zone / body) 2.Pipeline (by zone / body) B.Transfer agreements 1.Signed (by zone / body) 2.Pipeline (by zone / body) C.Other figures
12
EuropeAid 12 Signed delegation agreements - by zone Domain Number of DA foreseen (#) % of total Value of DA foreseen (M€) % of total ACP728%26 175 00026% OCT28%41 159 71840% Asia14%1 500 0001% Latin America00%0 Neighbourhood South00%0 Neighbourhood East00%0 Total geographic10 68 834 718 Thematic environment28%2 500 0002% Thematic food1352%30 464 12930% Total thematic15 32 964 129 Grand total25100%101 798 847100%
13
EuropeAid 13 Signed delegation agreements - by body StateBody Number of DA foreseen (#) % of total Value of DA foreseen (M€) % of total ATADA00%0 BECTB/BTC416%13 872 68414% CZMoFA00%0 DE GTZ1456%28 924 91728% KfW00%00,0% DKDANIDA00%0 FRAFD520%17 841 52818% LULUX00%0 NLSONA28%41 159 71840% PLMoFA00%0 PTIPAD00%0 SESIDA00%0 UKDFID00%0 Grand total25100%101 798 847100%
14
EuropeAid 14 Pipeline - delegation agreements - by zone Domain Number of DA foreseen (#) % of total Value of DA foreseen (M€) % of total ACP2851%119 825 00049% OCT24%41 159 71817% Asia59%34 865 00014% Latin America00%0 Neighbourhood South24%1 000 0000% Neighbourhood East12%10 000 0004% Total geographic38 206 849 718 Thematic environment47%5 500 0002% Thematic food1324%30 464 12913% Total thematic17 35 964 129 Grand total55100%242 813 847100%
15
EuropeAid 15 Pipeline - delegation agreements - by body StateBody Number of DA foreseen (#) % of total Value of DA foreseen (M€) % of total ATADA24%6 500 0003% BECTB/BTC59%19 872 6848% CZMoFA00%0 DE GTZ2851%102 639 91742% KfW24%6 000 0002,5% DKDANIDA24%5 000 0002% FRAFD713%26 841 52811% LULUX00%0 NLSONA24%41 159 71817% PLMoFA00%0 PTIPAD35%20 500 0008% SESIDA00%0 UKDFID47%14 300 0006% Grand total55100%242 813 847100%
16
EuropeAid 16 Signed transfer agreements - by zone Domain Number of TA foreseen (#) % of total Value of TA foreseen (M€) % of total ACP545%58 830 00074% OCT00%0 Asia19%13 353 80417% Latin America00%0 Neighbourhood South327%2 000 0003% Neighbourhood East00%0 Total geographic9 74 183 804 Thematic environment218%4 795 4506% Thematic food00%0 Total thematic2 4 795 450 Grand total11100%78 979 254100%
17
EuropeAid 17 Signed transfer agreements - by body StateBody Number of TA foreseen (#) % of total Value of TA foreseen (M€) % of total ATADA327%2 000 0003% BECTB/BTC218%14 330 00018% CZMoFA19%200 0000% DE GTZ 00%0 KfW DKDANIDA19%2 700 0003% FRAFD19%39 100 00050% LULUX00%0 NLMoFA19%2 700 0003% PLMoFA00%0 PTIPAD00%0 SESIDA19%4 595 4506% UKDFID19%13 353 80417% Grand total11100%78 979 254100%
18
EuropeAid 18 Pipeline - transfer agreements - by zone Domain Number of TA foreseen (#) % of total Value of TA foreseen (M€) % of total ACP1255%82 385 00059% OCT00%0 Asia418%45 753 80433% Latin America00%0 Neighbourhood South418%6 000 0004% Neighbourhood East00%0 Total geographic20 134 138 804 Thematic environment29%4 795 4503% Thematic food00%0 Total thematic2 4 795 450 Grand total22100%138 934 254100%
19
EuropeAid 19 Pipeline - transfer agreements - by body StateBody Number of TA foreseen (#) % of total Value of TA foreseen (M€) % of total ATADA314%2 000 0001% BECTB/BTC314%18 330 00013% CZMoFA15%200 0000% DE GTZ 00%0 KfW DKDANIDA314%6 100 0004% FRAFD15%39 100 00028% LULUX15%2 000 0001% NLMoFA29%32 700 00024% PLMoFA15%400 0000% PTIPAD00%0 SESIDA314%18 595 45013% UKDFID15%13 353 80410% Total EU19 132 779 254 CHDDC15%2 000 0001% CAMoFA15%3 768 0003% UNUNDP15%387 0000% Total other Donors3 6 155 000 Grand total22100%138 934 254100%
20
EuropeAid 20 Other figures Ratio Transfer / Delegation (value) o Signed = 78% o Pipeline = 57% Delegation average amount o Signed = € 4 million o Pipeline = € 4.4 million Transfer average amount o Signed = € 7 million (€ 4 million without AFD - Haïti) o Pipeline = € 6.3 million (€ 4.7 million without AFD – Haïti) Delegation average « cofinancing rate » o Signed = 60% o Pipeline = 40% Transfer average « cofinancing rate » o Signed = 14% o Pipeline = 20%
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.