Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics."— Presentation transcript:

1 China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics Robert Trapp, Willamette University

2 Arguments and Argumentation Arguments are tools primarily used in debates Arguments use reasons to establish claims. Since all debaters will use arguments, general principles of constructing arguments are needed.

3 Elements of Arguments Claim: the main point or conclusion of an argument. Evidence: any information on which the claim rests. Evidence is information that supports the claim. Link: a link is a statement that creates a bridge between the evidence and the claim. Reservation: not present in all arguments, a reservation explains special circumstances when the claim should be set aside.

4 Structure of a Simple Argument a single piece of evidence leads to a single claim, following along a single link, and perhaps accompanied by a reservation.

5 Structure of a Simple Argument In this example, the evidence is actually a previous claim that the audience has been convinced to accept.

6 Structure of a Simple Argument

7

8 Argument with Linked Structure Consists of multiple pieces of evidence linked with one another.

9 Argument with Linked Structure

10

11 Argument with Independent Structure Several pieces of evidence independently support a claim

12 Argument with Independent Structure

13

14 General Principles for Argument Construction Consequences of action – Choosing the action that has the most (or best) positive consequences and the fewest negative consequences. Principles that guide actions – Evaluates actions based on the inherent rightness or wrongness of the act rather than on the positive or negative consequences of the action.

15 Consequences Claim: Israeli policy towards Palestinian citizens prevents terrorist attacks on Israel. Description:Israeli policy allows Palestinian houses to be destroyed if suspected terrorists are present. Relationship:A policy of destroying houses containing suspected terrorists prevents terrorist attacks on Israel. Evaluation:Terrorist attacks on Israel have killed thousands of Israeli citizens.

16 Principles Claim: Israeli policy towards its Palestinian citizens violates the principle of human rights. Description: Current Israeli policy allows Palestinian homes to be destroyed. Relationship:Allowing homes to be destroyed violates of the right to property. Evaluation:The right to property is a basic human right. The Israeli policy therefore violates the principle of human rights.

17


Download ppt "China Debate Education Network: Constructing Arguments Presented by Li Yong, Guangxi University Chen Ying, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google