1. Project Management Committee Meeting Washington, D.C. September 21, 2004 Independent Study to Assess Future Savings from Mitigation, Track B Telephone Interview Data Preliminary Analysis

2. Track B Progress - I Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part I Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part I

3. Track B Progress - II Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part II Insert Table of progress on critical milestones and products, Part II

4. Informant Participation Status

5. Informant Participation Status by Community # Individuals

6. Reasons Not Approached (n=21)

7. Informant Referrals by Community FAKE DATA

8. Total Number of Contacts Needed to Complete Interviews (Includes Telephone, Mail, Fax, Email)

9. Acting Assistant City Manager REFUSED 2/3/04 Assistant Director of Public Works INTERVIEWED 1/27/04 1 City Manager, Originally agreed Then REFUSED 1/30/04 1 Dir. Public Works INTERVIEWED 2/9/04 Chief Building Inspector REFUSED 2/5/04 Associate Civil Engineer INTERVIEWED 2/11/04 Senior Planner REFUSED 2/5/04 HAZMAT Program Coordinator INTERVIEWED 2/18/04 Fire Chief REFUSED 2/5/04 Emergency Operations REFUSED 2/9/04 Division Head of Water Facility INTERVIEWED 2/19/04 1 Index Informant 2 Independent Network Director, Community & Economic Development INTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2 Public Information Officer INTERVIEWED 3/12/04 2 Flow Chart of Interview Network in Hayward FEMA Deputy Publicity Dir. for Utilities Not Approached Cal State Hayward Not Approached

10. FEMA Director, County EMA Interviewed 1 3/1/04 wo 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Jefferson Co. County Commissioner Interviewed 1 3/4/04 mb Director, fh Land Development Interviewed 3/4/04 Land Development e Interviewed 2/24/04 Land Development pr Interviewed 2/17/04 Former City Planner, Consultant jl Interviewed 2/23/04 Admin. Assistant, County EMA dk Interviewed 2/24/04 City NFIP Not Approached er Director, Inspection Services Not Approached bm County GIS Manager Not Approached jh County Commissioner Refused 3/8/04 ss Dir., Local Land Trust Interviewed 3/4/04 j Fire Chief, City of Tarrant Not Approached bh Auburn University Not Approached gl USGS Not Approached jr Dir. of County Inspection Services Not Approached bm State Hazard Mitigation Officer Not Approached dp President, Local df Engineering Company Interviewed 3/10/04 Hydrologist, Local dh Engineering Company Interviewed 3/10/04 County EMA Not Approached mh County EMA Not Approached ak

11. FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Horry Co. Emergency Planner, County EMD Interviewed 1 2/18/04 TS Director, Emergency Services County Red Cross Chapter Interviewed 3/19/04 ka Meteorologist, Local Television Station Interviewed 3/1/04 ep Public Safety Director, County EMD Interviewed 2/25/04 pw Property Manager, County EMD Interviewed 3/2/04 tl Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Clemson University Interviewed 2/23/04 tr National Weather Service Not Approached TM Head Building Official, City of Conway Not Approached RB Fire Chief, County Fire Department Refused 3/8/04 ga Director, County Storm Water Management Not Approached TG

12. FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Freeport Grant Administrator, Public Works Interviewed 1 3/23/04 NS Floodplain Manager, Superintendent of Buildings, Mitigation Coordinator Interviewed 3/18/04 jm Manager, Public Works Interviewed 3/16/04 ld Village Trustee; Owner, Local Insurance Agency Interviewed 3/23/04 bw Business Owner, Local Marine Storage Interviewed 4/14/04 dg Coordinator, Emergency Management Team Interviewed 5/25/04 DR Director, Emergency Management Interviewed 4/21/04 RH Business Owner, Local Restaurant JC Refused 5/27/04 Village Trustee DM Refused 5/21/04 Village Engineer, Department of Public Works Not Approached RF

13. FEMA 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Tuscola County Drain sp Commissioner Interviewed 1 4/5/04 Engineer, Local Eng. Group Refused 4/6/04 rh Prog. Admin., Intercounty Drains Interviewed 5/25/04 kh Lieutenant, State Police Dept. Interviewed 4/5/04 hp Township Mgr., Tittabawassee Interviewed 4/1/04 bk Engineer, Local Company Interviewed 3/25/04 jw Flood Specialist, City of Vassar ww Interviewed 4/2/04 President, Local Business Not Approached al Environmental Engineer, State Dept. Environmental Quality Interviewed 5/24/04 bm Engineer, Local Eng. Group Interviewed 4/1/04 hc Preliminary Research Manager, City of Vassar Interviewed 1 3/25/04sa Director, Public Works City of Frankenmuth Interviewed 1 4/2/04 rb State Hazard Mitigation Officer ms Not Approached Local Construction Co. Interviewed 1 3/22/04 js Engineer, Canadian Company Not Approached gh

14. 1 Index Informant Flow Chart of Interview Network in Jamestown City Engineer wk Interviewed 6/4/04 Consultant rp Interviewed 6/7/04 Local Red Cross Chapter Interviewed 6/18/04 bd Parks and Recreation dh Interviewed 6/30/04 State House of Reps. jk Interviewed 7/9/04 Weather Spotter Refused 6/4/04 jh Training Office, Fire Dept. Refused 6/8/04 jr City Fire Chief bg Interviewed 6/8/04 Police Chief Not Approached dd State Department of Emergency Management Not Approached lh City Administrator Interviewed 7/1/04 jf FEMA Mayor Interviewed 1 6/1/04 CK Director, State Dept. of Emergency Mgmt. Refused 7/6/04 df Asst. City Engineer Refused 7/6/04 lh President, Amateur Radio Association wt Interviewed 6/17/04 Local Cable Services rs Interviewed ??/??/04 County Emergency Manager Interviewed 6/21/04 jb

15. Interview Informant Job Titles (N=52) FAKE DATA

16. Informant Perceptions of Community Risk (N=52) FAKE DATA Very Low Very High

17. Percent of Informants who Believe the Community Has a Natural Hazard Mitigation Program (N=47) % Yes In your opinion, does the community have a natural hazard mitigation program?

18. Informants’ Knowledge of the Community’s Natural Hazard Mitigation Program (N=52) FAKE DATA Average Knowledge How much do you know about the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

19. Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (Elected Officials) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

20. Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (Appointed Officials) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

21. Informants’ assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program? (NGO/Partners) Insert Sample quotes. Insert Sample quotes. What is your assessment of the community’s natural hazard mitigation program?

22. How appropriate/effective do you consider these [natural hazard mitigation] efforts? (N=52) FAKE DATA

23. How does the community’s natural hazard mitigation program compare to natural hazard mitigation programs in other communities? (N=38)

24. Informants’ Perceptions of Benefits Provided by Mitigation Activities Which of the following benefits were provided by [this mitigation activity]?

25. Informants’ Perceptions of Primary Objectives/Benefits of Mitigation Activities What was the major objective of this activity?

26. Informants’ Perceptions Success Meeting Major Objectives with VS. without Mitigation Activities How would you rate the community’s success in meeting this [major] objective with/without this activity?

27. Spin-Offs: Total Number Mentioned Vs. Total Number Confirmed FAKE DATA # Spin-Offs