1. CEC-CAN Summer Policy Series ▪ July 2013 ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT UPDATE

2. WELCOME TO CEC’S 1 ST SUMMER POLICY SESSION! Deb Ziegler, Associate Executive Director, Policy & Advocacy Kim Hymes, Senior Director, Policy & Advocacy

3. TODAY’S AGENDA  ESEA Reauthorization & Waivers  Update on Legislative & Policy Proposals  Next Generation of Assessments  Teacher Evaluation 3

4. 4 4

5. 5 44 Representatives are past educators 7 Senators are past educators

6. 2007…2008…2009…2010…2011…2012…2013? What a difference 7 years makes!!

7. CEC’S ESEA GUIDING PRINCIPLES 7 Supporting a Well Prepared Successful Educational Workforce Improving Outcomes for All Children Through the Collaboration of All Educators Strengthening Assessment and Accountability for ALL Meaningful Systems that Encourage Collaborative and Supportive Measurement, Evaluation, and Reward of Professional Performance Developing Improved Strategies that Create Positive School Reform Meeting the Unique Needs of Gifted Learners Providing Full Funding to Execute the Goals and Provisions of ESEA

8. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) LOTS OF TALKING… 8

9. American Association of Administrators, Policy Insider Oct 2011 9

10. 10 White House Announces Waivers September, 2011

11. ESEA WAIVERS 11 – Remove 2014 AYP deadline – Funding Flexibility – Changes to Accountability – Flexibility for HQT Plans

12. 12 4 Conditions: – Adopt College & Career Ready Standards – Develop Assessments that Measure Student Growth – Develop Differentiated Accountability System – Develop Guidelines for Local Teacher and Principal Evaluations Based on Effectiveness ESEA WAIVERS

13. 39 States + Washington, DC have waivers 13 ESEA WAIVERS

14. 14

15. 2013 HOUSE VS. SENATE ESEA BILLS 15 Total Opposites!!

16. WHERE ARE WE IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS?? Passage by House Education Committee Passage by Senate Education Committee President Signs! Conference Committee Works Out Differences! Passage by Full House of Representatives Passage by Full Senate

17. July 19, 2013: Passed House by 221-207 vote; all Democrats and 12 Republicans voted against Two days of debate – 18 amendments passed – 4 amendments defeated – 4 withdrawn Student Success Act (HR 5) House Version of ESEA CEC Opposed, as did most of the education & disability communities

18. 18 Student Success Act (HR 5) House Version of ESEA Provisions in Student Success Act (HR 5) CEC Supports Eliminates AYP & 2014 Deadline Maintains Disaggregation of Subgroup Data

19. 19 CEC Expressed Serious Concerns with Student Success Act (HR 5) Reduces Accountability for Students with Disabilities Eliminates Highly Qualified Teacher Provisions Lacks focus on Professional Development Reduces, Caps and Eliminates Funding; Locks into place sequestration Increases Privatization Ignores High-Ability Students Student Success Act (HR 5) House Version of ESEA

20. Passed Senate Health, Education, Labor, Pensions (HELP) Committee June 12, 2013 Passed with only Democrat support Two days of debate and amendments Strengthening America’s Schools Act Senate Version of ESEA CEC supported with some reservations, as did most of disability community; education community split

21. 21 Provisions in Strengthening America’s Schools Act CEC Supports Focus on early learning for entry “ready to learn” Encourage equity through greater transparency and fair distribution of resources Limits Use of Alternate Assessment Changes to Accountability System, Focus on Bottom 15%, Low Performing Subgroups, Maintains Subgroup Disaggregation, Student Growth & Performance Targets; Eliminates AYP & 2014 Deadline Early Intervening Services in General Ed, UDL, PBIS Mental Health Supports Includes Key Provisions of CEC-Endorsed, TALENT Act for High-Ability Students Strengthening America’s Schools Act Senate Version of ESEA

22. 22 Provisions in Strengthening America’s Schools Act That Concern CEC New Requirements without Adequate Resources Accountability System Focus on Bottom 15% of Schools and Only Reporting for Remaining 85% Includes “Turnaround” Models that Promote Firing of Staff and Other Interventions Overemphasis of Teacher Evaluation from Federal Level Defining “Highly Qualified” to Include Individuals Still Enrolled in Alternate Route to Certification Programs Strengthening America’s Schools Act Senate Version of ESEA

23. WHAT’S NEXT FOR ESEA? 23

24. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS & THE FUTURE OF TESTING New Assessments, Adaptive Assessments, & Racing to the Top 24

25. RACE TO THE TOP ASSESSMENT CONTEST 25 Next Generation of Assessments 1% Dynamic Learning Maps 1% National Center & State Collaborative 99% Smarter Balanced Consortia 99% PARCC Consortia Aligns to the Common Core State Standards

26. TWO CONSORTIA: 1% Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Program (DLM) – Kansas University $22 million – 13 States - Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. – Accessibility - keyboard, drag-and-drop, touch- screen, and compatible with a variety of assistive technologies commonly used by students. 26

27. NATIONAL CENTER & STATE COLLABORATIVE 19 States: Alaska, Arizona Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Wyoming 27

28. ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA: PARCC Computer Based 28

29. ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA: SMARTER BALANCED 29 Computer Adaptive

30. TIMELINE 2012-13 School Year: First year pilot/field testing and related research and data collection – Fall 2012 – Small Scale Trials – 500 schools in 23 states – February – April 2013-14 School Year: Second year pilot/field testing and related research and data collection 2014-15 School Year: Full operational administration of PARCC assessments Summer 2015: Set achievement levels, including college- ready performance levels 30

31. TEACHER EVALUATION Waiver concerns and beyond… 31

32. POLICYMAKERS: A SHIFT IN FOCUS Highly Qualified Highly Effective Inputs Outputs 32

33. System Components Complex Role Measure Evidence- Based Practice Recognize Professionalism Incorporate Research CEC’s Position: Components of Special Education Teacher Evaluations 33

34. All educators must be included in one evaluation system. Evaluation systems must identify appropriate professional development opportunities for teachers based on the results of their evaluations. Evaluations must support continuous improvement. Evaluation processes and all measures of teacher effectiveness must be open and transparent to the teacher being evaluated. Include Fundamental System-Wide Components 37 TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEMS SHALL :

35. Evaluations must clearly identify and be based on a special education teacher’s specific role and responsibilities during a given school year. Evaluations must take into account the population of children and youth and their range of exceptionalities that special education teachers instruct. Evaluations must be conducted by evaluators with expertise related to evidence-based service delivery models and individualized teaching practices and interventions in special education. TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEMS SHALL : Identify the Complex Role of the Special Education Teacher 38

36. Evaluations must be based on multiple reliable measures and indicators that support valid measurement of special education teacher effectiveness. Evaluations should never be based solely on student growth. Statistical models that estimate a teacher’s contribution to student growth, such as value-added models, should not be applied to any teacher until there is a general consensus among researchers that the model provides a valid estimate of a teacher’s contribution to student growth. Measure the Use of Evidence-Based Practices 39 TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEMS SHALL :

37. CEC RESOURCES http://www.cec.sped.org/Policy-and-Advocacy

38. CEC RESOURCES www.policyinsider.org @CECAdvocacy

39. TAKE ACTION: CEC’S LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER www.cec.sped.org Choose: Policy & Advocacy Choose: Legislative Action Center www.cec.sped.org Choose: Policy & Advocacy Choose: Legislative Action Center 39

40. MARK YOUR CALENDARS! CEC CAN Summer Policy Series Continues… July 24, 2013, 10-11am (est): Advocacy strategies for new CAN Coordinators August: 1, 2013, 10-11am (est): Federal funding for special/gifted education programs

41. THANK YOU!! 41 Deb ZieglerKim Hymes Associate Executive DirectorSenior DirectorPolicy & Advocacy debz@cec.sped.org kimh@cec.sped.org