Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCharles Bond Modified over 9 years ago
1
PARTNER REPORTING ON SUPPORT TO STATISTICS (PRESS) November 2008
2
PRESS Quiz What were estimated disbursements on statistical support during the 3- year period 2006-8? a. USD 500 million b. USD 700 million c. USD one billion
3
PRESS Quiz How many countries received more than USD 5 million in disbursements during 2006- 08? a. 12 countries b. 15 countries c. 18 countries a
4
PRESS Quiz Which statistical area received over ¼ of total commitments? a. Economic statistics b. Institutional development support c. Population censuses
5
PRESS Reporting Information exchange Collaboration
6
Context Marrakech Action Plan for Statistics 2004 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2005 Third International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results 2007 Statistics for Results Facility 2008
7
Improve partner harmonisation and collaboration through information exchange Promote “scaling-up” of statistical support within overall development assistance Identify countries/areas requiring support Define funding strategies in context of NSDS Rationale
8
Background Initiative on partner reporting mechanism approved by PARIS21 Steering Committee and endorsed by CCSA, 2005 Light Reporting Exercise for Sub-Saharan Africa successfully carried out as pilot in 2005-06 Decision to create Task Team on design and development of PRESS, by CCSA and PARIS21 SC, 2006 – ToRs approved
9
Task Team on PRESS Members DFID France Eurostat OECD World Bank IMF UNECE FAO PARIS21 Secretariat -- coordinator
10
Task Team on PRESS Outputs Review of existing partner reporting systems OECD – Creditor Reporting System (CRS) World Bank -- Country Statistical Information Database (CSID) IMF – Technical Assistance Information Management System (TAIMS) DFID – Project Reporting System FAO – Field Programme Management Information System Eurostat/UNECE – Database for Balkan and Central Asian Countries
11
Task Team on PRESS More Outputs In-depth CRS study to assess its use for PRESS Classification of statistical areas Classification of financial/non-financial support Questionnaire (Excel-based) Identification of key features of PRESS
12
PRESS 2008 Round
13
PRESS 2008 PARTNERS 20 bilateral donors 20 multilateral institutions 17 regional organizations TOTAL: 83 18 sub-regional organizations 6 statistical training institutes 2 foundations
14
PRESS 2008 Data Collection OECD bilateral partners Extract data from CRS as of June 2008 through SCB code and search words Request data for 2007 and planned activities through PRESS questionnaire
15
PRESS 2008 Data Collection Other partners Request completion of PRESS questionnaire on past, current and planned activities
16
PRESS 2008 Database Developed in ACCESS Data input: For Others partners : Responses from PRESS questionnaire for past / current / planned For OECD members : From CRS until 2006 ( data discussed with CRS staff at DCD-Stat) From Questionnaire for current / planned years
17
PRESS 2008 Database Outputs of database: Tables for PRESS report Answers to partners’ queries Inputs for next round of PRESS
18
PRESS 2008 Database Housed and maintained by PARIS21 Secretariat Accessibility: not public at this time, but respond to specific requests
19
PRESS 2008 Report Volume I – Main text Volume II - detailed results Volume III – Directory of Partners
20
PRESS2008 KEY RESULTS
21
PRESS 2008 Partners Contacted Type of PartnerNumber Contacted Number of Respondents Bilateral donor2014 Multilateral organization2015 Regional organization1710 Sub-regional organization185 Training institute61 Foundation2- Total8345
22
PRESS 2008 Coverage 119 recipient countries IDA countries Lower middle income (up to USD 3705 per capita) Other African countries 775 projects/programmes
23
PRESS 2008 Data Limitations Financing levels may be overestimated Difficult to identify stat components in operations with budget support or sector- wide Possible double-counting for activities financed and implemented by different organizations
24
PRESS 2008 Data Limitations Financing levels may be underestimated Responses rely on respondent’s knowledge of partner’s projects Some partners did not report financing (info often at country level) Financing for known stat activities (DHS/MICS) not reported 38 partners did not respond, mainly regional and sub-regional organizations
25
PRESS 2008 Key Results Key financing results Key results by statistical category
26
Key financing results 2006-08 Active commitments on statistical support: USD one billion Caveat: aggregates activities committed in different years, that vary in duration, and whose amount may have changed over life of the activity
27
Key financing results 2006-08 Estimated disbursements during 2006-08: roughly USD 550 million Over half of this amount to Sub- Saharan Africa
28
Key financing results 2006-08 Disbursements to these countries amounted to less than 0.1% of their GDP AngolaParaguay Burkina FasoRwanda EthiopiaSierra Leone GhanaSudan KenyaUganda MozambiqueUkraine NigerVietnam Nigeria
29
Key financing results 2006-08 EC, World Bank, UK provided ¾ of total disbursements Caveat: number of partners did not report financial amounts nor support given at country level (e.g., UN agencies)
30
PRESS 2008 by Statistical Categories USD million
31
Key Results by Statistical Category Category 4 – Methodology of data collection Support to population censuses represented over ¼ of total 2006-08 commitments 2010 Round of Population Censuses: 25 countries done 73 countries planning 5 no date yet
32
Key Results by Statistical Category Category 4 Household budget surveys supported on ad hoc basis or as part of larger poverty operations Variety of surveys supported Living standards (US, MECOVI) CWIQ (UK, World Bank): 13 done; 8 planned DHS (US): 12 completed; 12 ongoing MICS (UNICEF): 37 conducted
33
Key Results by Statistical Category Category 5 – strategic/managerial issues Institutional development supported by many partners NSDS design supported by TFSCB grants 60 IDA countries: designing, awaiting adoption or implementing NSDS Technical training provided in most interventions
34
Key Results by Statistical Category Category 2 – Economic Statistics Macroeconomic statistics mainly through IMF TA (GDDS) and ICP program (World Bank/UK/AfDB/ADB) Sector statistics limited to sector-wide programs and specialized programs of technical partners (UN agencies)
35
Statistical Areas Receiving Little Support Formal statistical training African statistical training institutes supported by France EC finances African regional statistical training project Sector statistics, particularly environment
36
Introducing the 2008 Global Directory of Partners in Statistical Capacity Building Volume III Presents a birds eye view of 83 development partners supporting Statistics
37
Directory Organisation of the Document The Directory is divided into 7 main categories
38
Directory Colour Coding Multilaterals Bilaterals Africa Arab region Asia and the Pacific Latin America and the Caribbean Other Partners
39
Directory Multilateral Example
40
Directory Bilateral Example Developing Agency Followed by Statistical Office
41
Directory Information collection Through partner websites From partners’ responses to P21 request 64 partners have validated their information sheet –> 77%
42
PRESS 2008 Key messages
43
PRESS 2008 Key Messages Financial support to statistics is relatively small – < 5 cents for every $100 of bilateral grants in 2006 Statistical support is concentrated in few countries – 15 countries receive ½ of estimated disbursements Main focus of support is on institutional development and large activities – population censuses and household surveys
44
PRESS 2008 Key Messages Partner collaboration in statistical development needs to be strengthened – collaboration at country level could serve as examples More in-depth studies of PRESS results are necessary – e.g., closer review of support (or lack of support) to population censuses in relation to countries’ funding needs; or comparison of support to NSDS in relation to countries’ financing needs
45
PRESS – FUTURE Improved collaboration At HQ Level Partners improve own reporting mechanisms on statistical development Each partner prepares own report on statistical support, based on PRESS findings Feedback to CRS on PRESS findings
46
PRESS – FUTURE Improved collaboration At country level PARIS21 Secretariat assists national statistical offices in monitoring partner support, in framework of financing strategy for NSDS implementation Reports by partners’ country offices
47
PRESS – FUTURE Improved collaboration Last, but not least: DISSEMINATION of PRESS From partner HQ to its country offices (to appropriate staff, not only heads) PRESS leaflet under preparation
48
PRESS – Future Management: streamline PRESS into work program of PARIS21 Secretariat (Guide for reporting rounds being prepared) Periodicity: annual Output: annual report, with thematic focus PRESS Quality Advisory Group: provide guidance on future rounds
49
PRESS 2008 Partners’ final review Distribution of Advance Copy of three volumes of PRESS 2008 Request partners’ comments by November 14, 2008 Distribution to partners and recipient countries – November 2008
50
PRESS Quiz Answers What were estimated disbursements on statistical support during the 3- year period 2006-8? a. USD 500 million
51
PRESS Quiz Answers How many countries received more than USD 5 million in disbursements during 2006-08? b. 15 countries
52
PRESS Quiz Answers Which statistical area received over ¼ of total commitments? c. Population censuses
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.