1. Tempus Sixth Call Submission procedure 1

2. 2 TEMPUS IV Indicative budget for projects selected under 6th Call: €129.8 million* REGION/COUNTRIES 201220112010 Western Balkans € 14.15 million* Albania € 1.9; Bosnia and Herzegovina € 2.28; Montenegro €0.76; Serbia: € 6.65; Kosovo: € 2.56 € 14.5 million Albania € 1.9; Bosnia and Herzegovina € 2.3; Montenegro € 1.2; Serbia: € 6.6; Kosovo: € 2.5 € 12.4 million Albania € 0.9; Bosnia and Herzegovina € 2.2; Montenegro € 1; Serbia: € 6.3; Kosovo: € 2 Southern Mediterranean € 41.7 million€ 29 million€ 11.4 million Eastern Europe/Caucasus (Russia not included) € 42.35 million€ 29 million€ 11.4 million Bilateral allocation for Russia € 17.1 million (for national and multi-country projects involving Russia) € 8.5 million (for national and multi-country projects involving Russia) € 4.5 million (for national projects) Central Asia + bilateral allocation to Uzbekistan € 9.5 million € 5 million € 9.5 million € 9 million * An additional budget of € 11,11 million for the Western Balkan countries and € 5 million for Tunisia might become available following the adoption of the relevant Commission's decision.

3. Submission of the applications: E-form 3  One deadline  26 March 2013 26 March 2013 at 12:00 (midday) Brussels time  Two steps: 1 - On-line submission of the eForm, including 3 mandatory annexes (Declaration of Honour, Workplan and Budget Excel and Logical Framework Matrix) = unique reference information for the submission deadline. 2 - Administrative and legal documents by post. NO paper copy of the eForm is needed anymore.

4. Submission of the applications: E-form 4 Step 1: On-line submission of the eForm  Complete and validate the eForm + correct mistakes  Attach the mandatory annexes:  Declaration of Honour  Workplan and Budget Excel Table  Logical Framework Matrix  Click on the SUBMIT button of the eForm and an automatic notification is sent with the project Reference number Notification of results will be done only by electronic mail.  Provide in the eForm, a correct e-mail address, valid during the whole selection process. Check it regularly!

5. Submission of the applications: E-form 5 Step 2: Administrative and legal documents by post  Copy the Project reference number on each of the following documents:  Declaration of honour by the legal representative of the applicant organisation  Legal entity form  Bank identification form  Profit and loss accounts/ Balance sheet (if applicable)  Mandates 26 March 2013  Send the complete application package, by 26 March 2013, date of postmark, by registered post to the Agency postal address mentioned in the Call for Proposals.  Scanned versions are accepted for all supporting documents, even in case the project is selected. HOWEVER originals must be kept by the applicant administration.

6. Sources of guidance 6  The Instructions (for completing the Application form and the Budget Tables)  Rules and guidance on eForm content and the entire application process  The eForm User Guide  Help with the technical aspects of completing the eForm  Still need further assistance...? EACEA-TEMPUS-CALLS@ec.europa.eu

7. 7 Tempus Sixth Call Steps in the selection process

8. Indicative roadmap for selection process – 6th Call for Proposals 8 StepsDate Publication of Sixth Tempus IV Call for Proposals Second half of November 2012 Deadline for submission of applications 26 March 2013 Expert assessmentApril – June 2013 Consultation of Ministries of Education in Partner Countries, EU Delegation and National Tempus offices Mid-July – end-August 2013 Award decisionSeptember 2013 Notification of applicants & publication of resultsOctober 2013 Preparation and signature of grant agreementsOctober-November 2013 Start of eligibility period1 December 2013

9. 9 The selection process is based on the assessment of applications against 4 types of criteria:  Eligibility Criteria  Exclusion Criteria  Selection Criteria  Award Criteria The Call requirements

10. Eligibility criteria  Formal submission requirements  Grant size and duration  Applicant, Partners and Partnership requirements (number of partners, status of the grant applicant & partners, etc.)  National & regional priorities It does not matter how well the project has been designed if it does not fulfil the eligibility criteria: this will lead to the automatic rejection of the proposal

11. Main reasons for rejection on formal criteria 2012 (1) Out of 676 projects received,100 were rejected for not complying with the eligibility criteria, for the following reasons:  Applicant is NOT a higher education institution or association of HEIs  non-HEIs: non-profit organisations, foundations established as fund-raiser in universities; international organisations  faculties, departments, institutes, research centres or other university components  Legal documents NOT signed by the legal representative of the applicant organisation  Declaration of Honour  Mandates  Legal entity form

12. Main reasons for rejection based on formal criteria 2012 (2)  Consortium composition: minimum number of higher education institutions NOT respected:  Non-profit organisations, faculties, departments, institutes, research centres or other university components cannot count for HEIs  Ministry of higher education in Structural Measures projects NOT included  Minimum or maximum grant size NOT respected

13. Exclusion and Selection criteria Exclusion criteria:  The institution is not in one of the situations described in section 6. Exclusion criteria of the Guidelines (such as bankruptcy, profession misconduct, subject of fraud, corruption, administrative penalty, conflict of interest, etc) Legal person status of the applicant organisation Selection criteria  Financial capacity to complete the proposed activities  Operational capacity to complete the proposed activities Based on supporting and administrative documents, like the declaration of honour, legal entity form, profit and loss accounts...

14. Award criteria Five award criteria defined in the Call and assessed by external experts:  Relevance (25%)  Good quality partnership (20%)  Quality of the project’s content and methodology (25%)  Dissemination & Sustainability (15%)  Budget and Cost-effectiveness (15%)

15. Project assessment by external experts Briefing session  Two-day briefing on site: general and specific presentations, one-day assessment simulation, based on case study (team work) & handbook, debriefing Assessment  Each application assessed by two different experts, by teleworking, supported by the Agency’s on-line assessment tool  1st stage: Each expert carries out an individual assessment  2 nd stage: the 2 experts assessing the same proposals  consensus discussions  consolidated judgements and scores  Lead-experts - mediate discussions for consensus, ensure quality assessment outputs; perform 3rd assessment wherever consensus is not reached Debriefing panel with experts  Discussion on the quality of the proposals  Suggestions for improvement of the evaluation process

16. Selection of external experts  Currently > 500 experts names in database covering nationals from EU &Tempus Partner Countries  30% renewal each year, out of which 10% completely new experts  An expert can assess Tempus projects for a maximum of three years consecutively  Lack of conflict of interest duly checked and must be respected Criteria:  Professional experience in thematic areas covered by applications  Competences in the Tempus working languages: EN, FR, DE  Proved expertise in project cycle management, Tempus Programme and cooperation with the Tempus Partner Countries / Regions  Knowledge of the higher education modernisation agenda

17. 17 Access to the list of selected projects Information on the Programme Calls for Proposals How to apply Publications with Programme Guide Selection Results

18. 18 List of selected Tempus IV projects

19. Thank you for your attention! More on: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus