Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMildred Stephens Modified over 9 years ago
1
Compaq - Indiana University Visit IU’s Compaq Parallel PC Cluster
2
Clusters n Becoming more widespread n Benefits: u Cost, price/performance u Familiar operating system choices u Commodity components n Issues: u Interconnect/appropriate application space u Tools (administrator and user)
3
n 32 Compaq ProLiant 1850R compute nodes: u Dual 400 MHz Intel PII processors u 256 MB SDRAM, 512kB L2 cache u Two 4.3 GB “hot-plug” SCSI disks u Integrated 10/100 TX Ethernet interface and Packet Engines G-NIC II Ethernet interface n 3 controls workstation (NT Primary Domain Server, NT Terminal Server, Linux development system) IU ’ s Compaq Cluster
4
n Fast Ethernet: HP ProCurve 4000M 10/100Base-TX Switch n Gigabit Ethernet: Packet Engines PowerRail 5200 Switch. GB interconnect still largely experimental Parallel PC Cluster Interconnect
5
Parallel PC Cluster
6
Unique features of IU ’ s Compaq cluster n Evenhanded approach to OS issues. Key questions: Which is better under what circumstances? How can we make our scientists most productive? n Combination of computer science research, (production) scientific calculation, and artistic applications n Robustness of system n Relationship with NCSA
7
NT and Linux n Each compute node can be run under either NT or Linux (reboot required). n Default configuration of the Parallel PC Cluster is 16 nodes Linux, 16 nodes NT n For experiments & code that scales to 64 processors, cluster run under one OS n Future need: more flexible control over OS configuration
8
Linux Clusters
9
NT Clusters
10
Clusters running NT & Linux
11
Accomplishments to date n Investigation of system management tools n NT/Linux comparisons n Gigabit Ethernet investigation n Price/performance characterization n Use of applications software for production use
12
OS and system software choices n NT u System monitoring & mgmt: F Big Brother F Compaq Insight Manager u Job management: LSF u Compilers: F Microsoft Visual Studio F Digital Visual Fortran F Portland Group Suite u Parallel APIs F MPI (MPI/Pro) F PVM n Linux u System monitoring: F Big Brother u Job management: PBS u Software Development F GNU C/C++/F77 F Portland Group Suite u Parallel APIs F MPICH F PVM
13
System monitoring - Big Brother (NT & Linux)
14
System monitoring & management - Compaq Insight Manager
16
System management with Linux
17
Pallas MPI Benchmarks Maximum Throughput
18
Pallas MPI Benchmarks Latency
19
NT MPI Benchmarks Maximum Throughput
20
NAS Parallel Benchmarks
21
QCD Benchmark
22
Compiler issues n Under NT, Digital Visual Fortran tends to perform the best n Compilers for Linux are a substantial issue. GNU compilers have poor optimization for Pentuim processors. Code that one would expect to run well can run very poorly.
23
Price/Performance n For applications well suited to PC clusters, Price/Performance of the Compaq Parallel PC Cluster is better than a traditional supercomputer by a factor of 3 to nearly a factor of 10 n Using QCD code developed at IU, the P/P ratios are <$100/MFLOP vs ~$300/MFLOP
24
Application Software n Radiance n DART n SoftImage n AutoCAD n Gaussian n 3DStudioMax (to be installed)
25
Scientific & artistic projects u Physics: Quantum Chromodynamics u Astrophysics: 3-D Hydrodynamics u Engineering: Computational Fluid Dynamics u UITS: cluster performance research u Television animation production (WTIU): Parallel Rendering of animations u Virtual Reality: Distributed Ray Tracing, Volume Visualization
26
WTIU Video
27
Volume Visualization
28
Future Projects n Computer Science: Component architectures, Distributed Objects (e.g. CAT, DCOM, ActiveX, JavaBeans) n NCSA-related activities: Globus, distributed performance testing with NCSA, superclusters n Environmental Science: Groundwater modelling
29
Cat Workspace and Info Browser
30
PC Cluster Grid Computing n SC98 iGrid demonstrations included PC clusters used n IU is positioned to participate in the development of PC superclusters u Abilene, TransPAC, vBNS, EuroLink connectivity u NCSA Alliance institution u DOE2000 participation u APAN membership
31
iGrid Sites vBNS ESNet NREN Teleglobe CANTAT-3 CA*Net2 TransPAC (to APAN) TANet SINGAren
32
Issues/areas for further investigation u Cluster management tools for NT and Linux, incl. ability to reboot single and multiple workstations with OS selection u User filespace under NT u Compilers u Network Performance, esp. Gigabit ethernet u VIA vs. Kernel I/O networking
33
Conclusions n IU has assembled a robust Parallel PC Cluster based on Compaq servers n Both NT and Linux have areas of strength, areas of weakness n The IU Parallel PC Cluster can be used for production work in the sciences and arts under either NT or Linux
34
Thanks to: n Don Berry n Dave Hart n Dan Lauer n Rick McMullen n John Naab n Anurag Shankar n Shawn Slavin n Teresa Todd
35
Compaq - Indiana University Visit Thank you. Any questions?
36
n Except where otherwise noted, the contents of this presentation are © by the Trustees of Indiana University. This content is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This license includes the following terms: You are free to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work and to remix – to adapt the work under the following conditions: attribution – you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.