1. Contaminants in Fish and Wildlife National Park Service POPs and Air Toxics Workshop

2. Themes Why care about air toxics ? Potential sentinel species Trends from the Arctic Research gaps

3. Why Care about Air Toxics ? Biological Effects Subsistence

4. Why Care ? - Biological Effects Survival Reproductive success Growth Development Immunology/disease Behavior

5. What to Measure ? Chemical residues  Whole body, eggs  Feathers, fur, scat  Select tissues (liver, kidney, fat, flesh) Biomarkers of exposure/effect  Cytochrome P450 (PCBs, PAHs)  HII4E (dioxins, furans, coplanar PCBs)  Reproductive hormones  Vitamins

6. What Species ? Daphnia Photo: Paul Hebert, U. Guelph Biomagnification

7. Factors Affecting Bioaccumulation Metabolism and selective retention of different chemicals Marine vs. terrestrial food webs Within a species, trophic level can differ with age and location Stable isotope analysis (e.g., 15 N/ 14 N)

8. Trophic Level vs. DDT Concentration Source: AMAP Assessment Report

9. Trophic Level vs. PCB Concentration Source: AMAP Assessment Report

10. Why Care ? - Subsistence Important issue in AK Concern about contaminants in food Some people abandoning traditional foods Unhealthy alternatives, expense getting food to villages If NPS monitors biota in AK, issue will likely come up !

11. Subsistence Use Patterns Depend upon local availability Cultural and traditional uses Contaminants concentrations differ:  Berries, plants  Fish  Birds  Terrestrial Mammals  Marine Mammals

12. Characteristics of an Ideal Species? Widespread/ubiquitous distribution, found in all Parks Sessile or limited range (non-migratory) Likely to accumulate contaminants Sensitive to contaminant effects Easy to sample, won’t impact population Ecologically important Used for subsistence

13. Potential Sentinel Species Invertebrates Freshwater fish Anadromous fish (salmon) Marine fish Sea birds Loons Raptors Riverine/semi-aquatic mammal Large terrestrial mammals Marine mammals

14. Invertebrates Zooplankton - ubiquitous, marine and freshwater, important food items, contaminants not well studied, low trophic level, trace level contaminants work Benthic insects - ubiquitous, contaminants not well studied, food items, different trophic groups, stream drift Mussels - sessile, filter feeder, important food items, also useful for PAHs, extensive database, limited to marine systems

15. Char and Trout Most freshwater, some anadromous At least one species found in all Parks, but no single species ubiquitous Important for sport, subsistence and ecologically Trophic position varies with size, species, habitat Top predator in many freshwater systems Canadian data variable (food web, lake size) Circumpolar data for Arctic char (AMAP species) Lake trout data also abundant

16. Northern Pike Freshwater predators Extensive database in Canada and parts of U.S. Mercury often elevated in pike (good biomonitor for mercury), but OC’s typically low in pike fillets Common in some AK Parks, but not found in many Western NPS units USGS Photo

17. Anadromous Fish Salmon (also some trout and whitefish) Important ecologically and for subsistence, sport and commercial value Source of marine nutrients and contaminants (biological transport) Not found in all Parks Contaminant accumulation and sources outside Park boundaries Whole fish, fillets, liver, kidney

18. Marine Fish Marine bottom-dwelling and/or predatory fish Baseline data exists, particularly from contaminated areas Fish from contaminated harbors show lesions, tumors, PAHs in fish bile, elevated body burdens, etc. Limited to marine systems NOAA Photo

19. Seabirds Wide geographic distribution (i.e., gulls, cormorants) Eggs, feathers easy to collect Wide range of trophic/feeding guilds Subsistence food for some communities Extensive database (gulls, cormorants, some others) Known effects (e.g., cormorants) Migratory

20. Loons Wide geographic distribution Eat fish, accumulate contaminants Extensive database for metals (lead, mercury) Eggs, blood (metals), feathers (mercury) Migratory

21. Raptors Feed high in food web Bald eagle, osprey, falcons Known effects (eggshell thinning) Wide geographic distribution, but rare in many areas Often migratory, peregrine falcons highly migratory Eggs easy to collect, feathers formercury, chick blood reflects local conditions

22. Riverine/Semi-aquatic Mammals River otters, mink Toxicological benchmarks for mink, sensitive to PCBs Pacific NW otters – reduced size of bacculum, testes Wide distribution, but not abundant in many Parks Organs (liver, kidney) Mercury sampling - fur Canadians – otter scat Blood sampling ? USGS-BRD Photo

23. Large Terrestrial Mammals Caribou, moose, elk found in many Parks Important for subsistence Charismatic mega-fauna No single species found in all Parks Herbivores (lower trophic position) Caribou often highly migratory Liver, kidney, meat Metals (e.g., cadmium) elevated in kidney

24. Marine Mammals Polar Bear – top Arctic predator, extensive circumpolar database, known biological effects, limited distribution Belugas - well studied, accumulates contaminants, limited range Bowhead whales – growing database, feed on krill/plankton, limited range, migratory NOAA Photo (modified)

25. Seals Ringed seals – primary polar bear prey, important for subsistence, limited range Harbor seals – extensive range but not used much for subsistence, existing database

26. Orcas Long-lived species Resident populations (feed on salmon) vs. transient populations (marine mammal prey) One of most heavily contaminated species known Ecological importance Blubber samples less invasive Limited to marine systems

27. Recommendations ? First must agree on some “basics”  Common species/group across all Parks vs. high priority species within each individual Park ?  Focus on non-migratory species ?  Subsistence implications important ?  Trend monitoring important ?  What level of expertise required to do sampling (e.g., eggs or feathers vs. blood samples)

28. Some Possible Choices: Ecological Mussels (good for coastal environment) Resident predatory freshwater fish (e.g. char or trout, possibly Northern Pike) Mink or river otters Raptors, seabirds or loons (eggs, feathers)

29. Some Possible Choices: Subsistence Need to consider local uses, what is important in your area ? Salmon Resident fish Marine Mammals Large terrestrial game animals Migratory waterfowl Bird eggs

30. Trends Peregrine Falcons from Alaska Otters and Pike from Sweden Canadian Ringed Seals

31. Trends- AK Peregrine Falcons Peregrine falcon study (’79-’95) Egg samples from two sub-species (North Slope, Interior AK) Metals and OCs Temporal trends

32. Trends – AK Peregrine Falcons Most OCs, including DDE, decreased with time PCBs declined less rapidly than other OCs

33. Trends - AK Peregrine Eggs Most metals decreased or did not change, except mercury, which may have increased (at least in one sub-species) Mercury concentrations in some cases approach levels which may impair reproduction

34. Trends - European Otters (Muscle) Source: AMAP Assessment Report

35. Trends – Canadian Ringed Seals Blubber from female seals Source: AMAP Assessment Report

36. Trends – Canadian Ringed Seals Mercury in liver tissue (ug/g) Source: AMAP Assessment Report

37. Trends – Swedish Pike Lake Storvindeln, Sweden Source: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

38. Research Needs Toxicological thresholds for various species (and various chemicals) Implications of chronic non-lethal exposure Chemical mixtures (always present) “New” chemicals such as brominated flame retardants, perflurinated compounds (Scotchgard), etc. Communicating results to the public and managers in a way that is easy to understand, informative, accurate

39. Summary Monitoring biota for contaminants can be important for a variety of reasons (ecosystem integrity, species health, subsistence, track temporal change) Various biota and endpoints have different strengths/weaknesses No one single species is ideal for all purposes Goals must be clearly articulated Many outstanding research needs exist

40. Questions/Discussion ?