Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Indices of Deprivation 2010 Overview of the Indices and Data for Rotherham CYPS Voluntary & Community Sector Consortium Presentation 5 th July 2011 Elena.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Indices of Deprivation 2010 Overview of the Indices and Data for Rotherham CYPS Voluntary & Community Sector Consortium Presentation 5 th July 2011 Elena."— Presentation transcript:

1 Indices of Deprivation 2010 Overview of the Indices and Data for Rotherham CYPS Voluntary & Community Sector Consortium Presentation 5 th July 2011 Elena Hodgson, RMBC Policy Team

2 Indices of Deprivation 2010 Commissioned by CLG Produced by Oxford University Updates the previous ID 2007 7 Domains (38 indicators) Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2008/09 baseline SOA Geography (166 in Rotherham) 6 District Measures - 326 districts (-28) Health warnings!

3 ID Domains & Weighting for IMD Deprivation Domain Weight Income22.5% Employment22.5% Health & Disability13.5% Education, Skills & Training13.5% Barriers to Housing & Services9.3% Living Environment9.3% Crime9.3%

4 Rotherham Deprivation relative to England % of Rotherham population within English IMD deciles: IMD 2004 IMD 2007 IMD 2010 Most Deprived 10%12% 17% Most Deprived 20%33%32%33% Most Deprived 30%49%46% Most Deprived 50%71%65%68%

5 Relationships with Deprived Areas % of Rotherham within English IMD 2010 deciles PopBMEPakDLACouncil Homes ASB Most Deprived 10% 17%37%48%25%32%30% Most Deprived 20% 33%54%58%45%62%49% Most Deprived 30% 46%67%71%60%78%63% Most Deprived 50% 68%79%88%79%93%81%

6

7 District (2010 rank)200420072010Change Rotherham (53)17.819.216.3- 1.5 Barnsley (47)7.912.114.4+ 6.5 Doncaster (39)11.311.612.0+ 0.7 Wigan (65)15.018.919.9+ 4.9 St Helens (51)10.213.315.6+ 5.4 Wakefield (67)15.318.620.6+ 5.3 Stockton (100)21.227.730.7+ 9.5 Redcar (48)12.414.114.7+ 2.3 Sheffield (56)16.917.817.2+ 0.3 District Comparison Changes in Rank Percentile 2004 - 2010

8 IMD 2007 (Wards shown)

9 IMD 2010 (Wards shown)

10 Most Deprived SOAs in Top 3% of 32,482 English SOAs SOA Ward Rank East Herringthorpe NorthValley230 (+311) Canklow North Boston Castle434 (+335) Eastwood East Rotherham East641 (+379) Town CentreBoston Castle671 (+818) East Dene EastRotherham East707 (+349) Thrybergh South/ ChesterhillValley736 (+151) MasbroughRotherham West847 (+287) FerhamRotherham West851 (+182) East Herringthorpe SouthValley920 (+595)

11 Deprivation by Domain England:Top 10% Change 07 - 10 Top 20%Top 50% Health33%+8%56%97% Education24%- 4%41%74% Employment22%+ 5%38%71% Income14%+ 1%30%61% Crime11%+ 8%26%67% Environment3%06%31% “Barriers”0%01%12%

12 Deprivation Drivers In a national context, Rotherham is most deprived in terms of:  Health & Disability  Education, Skills & Training  Employment Income & Crime deprivation above average Child poverty most polarised (15 fold)

13 Health & Disability Domain 2010

14 Education & Skills Domain 2010

15 Employment Domain 2010

16 Crime Domain 2010

17 Closing the Gap? IMD Quintiles within Rotherham Average Score 2004 Average Score 2007 Average Score 2010 Change 2004-10 Change 2007-10 Most Deprived 20%49.949.152.2+ 2.3+3.1 Most Deprived 20-40%35.634.436.4+ 0.8+ 2.0 Average Areas25.823.925.1- 0.7+1.2 Least Deprived 20-40%17.715.516.2- 1.5+ 0.7 Least Deprived 20%11.510.210.4- 1.1+ 0.2 Rotherham Average28.226.728.1- 0.1+ 1.4 No!

18 Change 2007 – 10 in WNP Target Areas

19 Key Messages Deprivation increasing, still Top 20% Health Deprivation most severe Improvements in Education but…. Most deprived areas fared worst Areas with low deprivation doing best New housing has reduced local deprivation scores Polarised Crime, Health, Education & Employment 17.6% deprived of income but…. –23.4% children vs 14.3% working age adults

20 Policy Challenges Regeneration Initiatives –No plans to replace WNF –Mainstream tackling inequalities Prioritising Resources: –Closing the Gap / No Community Left Behind? –Past initiatives made little lasting impact –Lessons from Eastwood, Chesterhill & Local Ambition –Building sustainable & attractive communities (where people want to live) –Joining-up services Tackling Ill-health & related issues

21 Links to Priorities Strategic Priority (RMBC / LSP) Relevant Domains Key Policy Issues or Objectives Access to Jobs, Training & Qualifications Employment Education Raising adult skill levels Reducing Long term unemployment Ensure the best start in lifeEmployment Education Health, Income Reducing child poverty Multi-agency prevention & early intervention Providing quality educationEducationRaising attainment and aspiration in most deprived areas Care & Support for vulnerable people HealthSupport for disabled people Health Promotion, Preventative care, Mental health People happy & safe where they live Crime Environment Reducing crime & ASB Housing condition

22 Action Plan Cascade information within Council & LSP –Influence strategies & priorities –Include findings in service planning –Inform commissioning Check against latest data to update trends Check underlying indicators when published Include in refreshed publications: –Community Strategy –JSNA & “Comprehensive Needs Assessment” –LASOS (www.lasos.org.uk)


Download ppt "Indices of Deprivation 2010 Overview of the Indices and Data for Rotherham CYPS Voluntary & Community Sector Consortium Presentation 5 th July 2011 Elena."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google