Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013.

Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013

Describe Yourself Through Pictures

Edgewood ISD UNDERSTANDING THE NEW ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM AND THE APPLICATION ANNA NIETO AUGUST 12, 2013

A Solid Foundation with a World-Class Education

Agenda for the Session  Accountability System  Understanding the Reports  Application to the System  My Campus  What Must Change?  How Will We Share with Our Staff?

Norms for the Session  Participate  Share, Discuss, Plan  Stay on task  Learn and use new vocabulary  Be Prepared to Replicate  Retreat  Questions  Ask Me  Parking Lot  Related Questions  Use Thinking Maps  Phones off and out of the way  Campus may call Emma Frey secretaries if there is an emergency  Group Breaks

Notes Packet o Structured Notes Packet o Information to Develop Understanding o Process o Reflections

Assessment

Accountability System

Ratings

Edgewood 31 57 59 84 What does it mean?

Edgewood Ratings Numbers in a system mean nothing without an anchor.  Understand the system  Component  Impact  Multitude of methods to measure performance  Safeguards  Diversity  Coordination  How is it derived  What must be done to increase scores

Accountability TEA Resources  2013 Accountability Manual  2013 Accountability System Frequently Asked Questions  Technical Digest and Reports Reports  Accountability Reports  Performance Reports  Snapshots

Accountability State and Federal Ratings ◦Met Standard ◦Improvement Required ◦Not Rated ◦Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues Index Framework ◦Student Achievement ◦Student Progress ◦Closing Performance Gaps ◦Postsecondary Readiness

Accountability  Four Reports  Accountability Summary  Index Calculation and Data Tables Report  System Safeguards  Distinction Designation Summary

Types of Reports

Index Calculation and Data Tables Reports System Safeguards Reports Distinction Designations Report Accountability Summary Report

Index Calculation and Data Tables Report  Calculation for each Index  Data Table for all students, each content, ethnicities, and populations

System Safeguards Report  Poor performance in one area may not result in Required Improvement  Disaggregated performance  Address performance  Poor performance not masked  Meet additional federal requirements  School Improvement  TAIS

Distinction Designations Reports  Met Standard  Comparison Groups  Top 25% Student Progress  Academic Achievement in Reading/Language Arts  Academic Achievement in Mathematics  Eligible if Rating is Met Standard

Accountability Summary Report  Rating  Performance Index Report  Performance Index Summary  System Safeguards

Perceptions immediate or intuitive recognition or appreciation, as of moral, psychological, or aesthetic qualities; insight; intuition; discernment

High Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Efficacy High Sense of Efficacy Urgency – Internal or external pressure to get better results Efficacy – Belief in having the skills, tools, resources to accomplish the intended results

High Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Efficacy High Sense of Efficacy Urgency – Internal or external pressure to get better results Efficacy – Belief in having the skills, tools, resources to accomplish the intended results Mark a star where you are Mark a star where your teachers are

Perceptions Compare responses at your campus table Discuss why you responded as you did

High Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Urgency Low Sense of Efficacy High Sense of Efficacy CHANGE People See need to change Feel they have the tools Significant improvement is possible with leadership CHANCE People Don’t see a need to change Staff is skilled and believe they make a difference STATUS QUO People Don’t perceive a need to do anything This too shall pass We’re doing the best we can DESPAIR People Are in crisis Don’t believe they can make a difference Blame others, give up Buy stuff

Perceptions  What is easier to change – urgency or efficacy?  Why is this important?  What can you address?  How can you address it?

Develop Understanding WORK SESSION

Accountability Index Framework ◦Student Achievement ◦Student Progress ◦Closing Performance Gaps ◦Postsecondary Readiness

Indices Index Framework ◦Index 1 Student Achievement ◦Index 2 Student Progress ◦Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps ◦Index 4 Postsecondary Readiness

Purpose of the Index  Why are there four indices?  What is the purpose of each?

Experts in Accountability

Task Divide your campus table into four groups. ElementaryMiddle SchoolHigh School 1 – 1 Person 2 – 1 Person 3 – 1 Person 4 – 1 Person 1 – 1 Person 2 – 2 Person 3 – 2 Person 4 – 1 Person 1 – 2 Person 2 – 2 Person 3 – 2 Person 4 – 2 Person Additional Groups Career Academy – Join each High School DAEP – Join each Middle School Burleson – Join Las Palmas Cardenas – Join Roosevelt Stafford – Join Stafford Why? This is your Index District – Divide the sections

Campus Folder Materials Jigsaw Activity ◦Pages of the Accountability Manual ◦Master Copy – Leave it! 1.Separate the pages according to the Index 1.Multiple sets for the overlap pages 2.Determine who should have the intro pages

Manual Pages Index 1 Student Achievement Pages 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24 Index 2 Student Progress Pages 16, 17, 24, 25, 26

Manual Pages Index 3 Closing Performance Gaps Pages 17, 18, 26, 27, 28 Index 4 Postsecondary Readiness Pages 18, 19, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

Your Task Develop an understanding of your assigned Index!  What is the Index?  What does it measure?  How is the measure calculated?  Why is it important to measure this index?

Your Task 1.Read and develop an understanding of your section. 1.Five minutes 2.Highlight, Take Notes 2.Meet with your same index group 1.All Levels 3.Discuss and record the components of your index 1.Bullet points 4.Make certain your address the questions 1.Chart – Post 2.Note Packet 15 Minutes to Work! Everyone in the group must be prepared to share

Index Understanding Return to your campus station Share information Note Taking Packet Does your staff need to know this information? ◦How will you share it?

Index Review What would a campus have to do to be successful with each of the indices?

Edgewood ISD Data EXAMINE AS A GROUP

Edgewood ISD Data Reports Process ◦Develop understanding by reviewing the Edgewood ISD report for each report ◦Examine and report ◦Review your campus data ◦Post your findings

Reports Available Index Calculation and Data Table Report System Safeguards Distinction Designations Accountability Summary

Index Calculation and Data Table Report

Edgewood ISD Data Calculation Report ◦Information as to how each Index was calculated ◦Walk through the document ◦Continue note page ◦Use a calculator

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Understand  Four reports  1 = 3

Edgewood ISD Data CALCULATION REPORT ◦Index 1 ◦Page 1 = Calculation (Summary of the Tables) ◦Pages 2 & 3 = Data Table for the Index (Highlighted = used for the calculation) ◦Index 2 ◦Page 4 =Calculation ◦Pages 5 & 6 = Data Table ◦Index 3 ◦Page 7 & 8 = Calculation ◦Pages 9 & 10 = Data Table ◦Index 4 ◦Page 11 = Calculation ◦Page 12 = Data Table TARGETS ◦Index 1 ◦50 ◦Index 2 ◦Elementary 30 ◦Middle School 29 ◦High School 17 ◦District 21 ◦Index 3 ◦55 ◦Index 4 ◦75

Index 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Calculation Page 1 – Index 1  Total Tests Met (Phase-in 1 Level II or higher)  Total Tests  %Met - Do the calculation  Index Points  Target  Check mark if met  Circle if not met Continue to take notes on your Note Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Data Tables – Page 2 – Index 1  Relate to Page 1  Match  Total Tests = Group Size (minimum of 25)  Look at the contents 1.Underline every Group Size/Total Tests greater than 25 Continue to take notes on your Note Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Page 2 – Index 1  Continue to examine  Was the population at the target?  Look at the contents 2.Record a checkmark for every group greater or equal to the target Continue to take notes on your Note Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Page 2 and 3 – Index 1  Continue to examine each content  Follow the same procedure  Underline the groups that meet minimum size  Check the groups that met the target Continue to take notes on your Note Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Page 2 and 3 – Index 1  One last point 3.Circle the groups that did not meet the target  Complete for each content Continue to take notes on your Note Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Summarize the District results for Index 1  Groups meeting minimum size  Groups met standard  Groups not meeting standard  What does this mean?  What do we do? Record on your Edgewood Reflections Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Review the data for your campus for Index 1 1.Underline Minimum Size Groups 2.Check mark the groups that met the target 3.Circle the groups not met Record on your Campus Reflections Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Review the data for your campus for Index 1  Chart Paper for your campus – Use for all 4 Indices  Record strengths  Record needs  Examine as a District

Improve Index 2 Focus

Student Expectation Difficulties What causes them? How do we address?

1 + 1 + 1 = _

1 + 1 + 1 = 9

Student Expectation Difficulties How does this change instruction?

Table Talk What do you commit to doing differently?

Index 2 STUDENT PROGRESS

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Calculation - PROGRESS Page 4– Index 2  Experts????  Weighted  Maximum Points  Where did that number come from? Why is it different? Index 2 Score?????? Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 2 Edgewood Data

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Calculations Pages 5  Review the Reading  Weighted  Which groups are included? Why?  How are points earned?  Which group made the most progress? Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 2

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Data Table Page 6  Match the Reading  Use the process that we used for Index 1 for Group Size  Which groups are included? Why?  How are points earned?  How many points are the maximum for each group? Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 2

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Data Table Page 6  The Target  District = 21  Elementary = 30  Middle School = 29  High School = 17 Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 2 But listen!!!!! Place a check mark by the groups that met the standard. But listen!!!!!     

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Data Table Page 6  The Target  District = 21  Elementary = 30  Middle School = 29  High School = 17 Complete the Math and Writing Place a check mark by the groups that met the standard. Complete the Math and Writing     

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Summarize the District results for Index 2  Groups meeting minimum size  Groups met standard  Groups not meeting standard  What does this mean?  What do we need to change?  What might cause a campus to NOT meet this index? Record on your Edgewood Reflections Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Review the data for your campus 1.Underline Minimum Size Groups 2.Check mark the groups that met the target 3.Circle the groups not met Record on your Campus Reflections Page

Improve Index 2 How Does Your Campus Implement What We Have?

Improve Index 2

 Purpose of the WAR Area  Value Added System  Student Conferences  Establish Goals  Successful Students

Index 3 CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Closing Performance Gaps Page 7– Index 3  Experts???? – What is different about the groups measured?  Why are these populations addressed?  Maximum Points  Where did that number come from? Why is it different? Index 3 Target is 55. Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 3  Did EISD meet? Edgewood

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Page 7 & 8– Index 3  Continue the calculations  Examine the populations closely  Pages 9 & 10 Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 3  Did EISD meet?     

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Page 7 & 8– Index 3  Continue the calculations  Examine the populations closely  Pages 9 & 10 Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 3       Complete the Math, Writing, Science, and Social Studies

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Summarize the District results for Index 3  Groups meeting minimum size  Groups met standard  Groups not meeting standard  What does this mean?  What do we need to change?  What might cause a campus to NOT meet this index? Record on your Edgewood Reflections Page

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Review the data for your campus 1.Underline Minimum Size Groups 2.Check mark the groups that met the target 3.Circle the groups not met Record on your Campus Reflections Page

Improve Index 3 Change Instruction to STAAR Instruction

Reading Look Fors:  Use context to determine or clarify the meaning of words  Make inferences/use textual evidence  Summarize, paraphrase and synthesize texts  Make connections between texts

Writing Look Fors:  Revise  Write to a prompt while maintaining a focus  Clear thesis  Writing across contents

Math Look Fors:  Math in everyday situations  Use a problem solving model  Select/develop a problem solving strategy  Use mathematical tools  Communicate mathematical ideas  Make generalizations, conjectures and justify thinking

Science Look Fors:  Analyze information  Interpret information  Make inferences  Communicate valid conclusions  Use scientific tools and instruments  Use models to represent

Social Studies Look Fors:  Sequencing, categorizing, cause/effect, inference  Organize, analyze and interpret information  Use primary and secondary resources

What did you notice about the Look Fors? Embedded Process Skills

Index 4 POST SECONDARY READINESS

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Post Secondary Readiness Page 11 – Index 4  Experts???? Target?  What are the options here? Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 4 Did EISD meet? 

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Post Secondary Readiness  Graduation Calculation  Underline groups  Check if met Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 4         

Index Calculation and Data Table Report Post Secondary Readiness Page 11 – Index 4  RHSP/DAP Added to Graduation Rate for points  What is the impact of these indicators?  What problems can be noted? Continue to take notes on your Note Page for Index 4

Index Calculation and Data Table Report  Elementary and Middle Schools  Groups meeting minimum size  Groups met standard  Groups not meeting standard  Concerns  High Schools Record on your Edgewood Reflections Page 2014 = Final Level II

Improve Index 4 Prepared Students

Improve Index 4 Cannot Wait until High School Cannot Wait until High School  Grade 3 Reading Level III  Grade 4 Writing Level III  Grade 5 Math Level III  Grade 7 Writing Level III  Grade 8 Reading Level III  Grade 8 Algebra I Participation  Grade 8 Algebra I Level III

Finished One Set of Reports

System Safeguards

Poor performance in one subject or grade level or student group does not result in Improvement Required rating.  Disaggregated data is reported  Campuses are responsible for addressing performance for each subject and each student group  Method to meet federal accountability  Any group with 25 or more tests is evaluated  Includes targets for caps

System Safeguards  Disaggregated performance  Ensure poor performance not masked  Meet the target  Federal Components  Participation  CAP  Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)  Additional Information on Improvement Requirements  Interventions Forthcoming

System Safeguards  Review the System Safeguard Report For Edgewood  Compare the Student Achievement Calculation/Data Tables  Review contents on pages 2 and 3  Does it match?

System Safeguards Failure to meet the safeguard target for any reported cell is addressed through TAIS. Manual Page 69

System Safeguards At your table determine which indicators were not met by the District. What areas require the greatest improvement for the District? ◦Select Two

System Safeguards  Review the System Safeguard Report For Campus  Compare the Student Achievement Calculation/Data Tables  Review contents on pages 2 and 3  Does it match?

System Safeguards Review the System Safeguards for your campus How many System Safeguards does your campus need to meet? Which category has the most indicators for your campus? Did your campus meet all indicators? What indicators require improvement? Can a campus meet all System Safeguards and still be designated as Improvement Needed?

System Safeguards  How many indicators is the District responsible for?  Why?

System Safeguards Results reported for any cell that meets minimum size Failure to meet the target  Address in the CIP or DIP  Texas Accountability Intervention System  Incorporate into improvement efforts  Based on performance  Current year state accountability

Address in the CIP or DIP

Distinction Designations

Acknowledgements TAKS SYSTEM Gold Performance Award STAAR SYSTEM  Distinction Designation  Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA  Academic achievement in Mathematics  Top 25% Student Progress  Campus Level ONLY

Distinction Designation  Campus Comparison Groups  Type  Size  Economically Disadvantaged  Mobility  ELLs

Distinction Designation  Campus Comparison Groups – 40 Schools  AADD  Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA  Academic achievement in Mathematics  Top quartile for the group (?)  Elementary and Middle Schools = 50% minimum  High Schools = 33%  Student Progress  Top 25%

Distinction Designation

 Campus Comparison Groups  Top 25% Student Progress  What does that mean?

Distinction Designation  Review the report for your campus  What are the strengths?  What can you build upon?  If the rating is Improvement Required can you earn a Distinction Designation?

Final Components to Examine THREE REPORTS DOWN ONE TO GO

 Rating  Summarizes the Index Calculation and Data table Report, System Safeguard

TEA Ratings

Edgewood ISD Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201260NA58NA 201359315784 Target50215575 Met Standard Stage 2 Year 2 Met 32 out of 51 System Safeguards

Kennedy High School Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201270NA67NA 201360186083 Target50175575 Met Standard Met 26 out of 39 System Safeguards

Memorial High School Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201265NA62NA 201355165784 Target50175575 Improvement Required Stage 1 Met 25 out of 39 System Safeguards

High School Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 Kennedy60186083 Memorial55165784 Target50175575

Brentwood Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201254NA51 2013553055 Target50295575 Met Standard Stage 2 Year 2 Met 21 out of 33 System Safeguards

Gus Garcia Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201249NA46 2013563853 Target50295575 Improvement Required Stage 3 Met 23 out of 32 System Safeguards

Wrenn Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201256NA53 2013653366 Target50295575 Met Standard Stage 2 Year 2 Met 28 out of 34 System Safeguards

Middle School Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 Brentwood553055 Gus Garcia563853 Wrenn653366

Cisneros Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201258NA58 2013634061 Target503055 Met Standard Stage 1 Year 2 Met 19 out of 23 System Safeguards

Gardendale Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201262NA61 2013694767 Target503055 Met Standard Stage 1 Year 2 Met 22 out of 22 System Safeguards Top 25% Student Progress

HB Gonzalez Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201258NA60 2013554052 Target503055 Improvement Required Stage 2 Met 17 out of 22 System Safeguards

LB Johnson Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201270NA67 2013753972 Target503055 Met Standard Met 22 out of 22 System Safeguards Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA

Las Palmas Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201261NA57 2013573751 Target503055 Improvement Required Stage 1 Met 25 out of 27 System Safeguards

Loma Park Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201255NA57 2013644262 Target503055 Met Standard Met 27 out of 27 System Safeguards Top 25% Student Progress

Perales Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201263NA63 2013613358 Target503055 Met Standard Met 21 out of 24 System Safeguards

Roosevelt Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201260NA61 2013684265 Target503055 Met Standard Met 27 out of 27 System Safeguards

Stafford Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201268NA69 2013694265 Target503055 Met Standard Met 27 out of 27 System Safeguards Academic Achievement in Math Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA

Winston Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201257NA55 2013573553 Target503055 Improvement Required Stage 2 Met 22 out of 22 System Safeguards

Stafford Early Childhood Center Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201268NA69 2013694265 Target503055 Met Standard

Cardenas Early Childhood Center Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201260NA61 2013684265 Target503055 Met Standard

Burleson Early Childhood Center Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 201261NA57 2013573751 Target503055 Improvement Required Stage 1

Elementary School Data Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 Cisneros 634061 Gardendale 694767 HB Gonzalez 554052 LB Johnson 753972 Las Palmas 573751 Loma Park 644262 Perales 613358 Roosevelt 684265 Stafford 694265 Winston 573553

Campus Index Differences Index 1Index 2Index 3Index 4 Kennedy 1015 8 Memorial 52 9 Brentwood 510 Gus Garcia 69-2 Wrenn 15411 Cisneros 13106 Gardendale 191712 HB Gonzalez 510-3 LB Johnson 25917 Las Palmas 77-4 Loma Park 14127 Perales 1133 Roosevelt 181210 Stafford 191210 Winston 75-2 Similarities Strengths

State Comparisons Statewide Results 84.2% Met Standard 6.1% Improvement Required Edgewood Results 66.7% Met Standard 33.3% Improvement Required

Additional Data

Not Done with Data  AP  SAT/ACT  TALA  mSTAAR Universal Screener  TELPAS  TPRI/Tejas LEE  Fontas & Pinnell  mClass  Attendance  Substitutes  Discipline  CBAs  Etc.

Changes for 2013 - 2014 Standards remain at Phase In Level I Statistical Equating Last year of Modified Assessments Index Changes

TEA Information August 9, 2013 TO THE ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESSED: SUBJECT: Implementation of Title I School Improvement Program (SIP) interventions for the 2013-2014 school year. SIP requirements not required prior to the start of school year 2013-2014:  20% District Reservation for School Choice, 1% for Parent Outreach and Supplemental Educational Services (SES)  10% Campus Reservation for High-quality Professional Development  School Choice Parent Notification Letter  SES Parent Notification Letter and Packets

TEA Information  What does it mean?  One System  Federal Program Directors

Synthesis  Why do you need to know the System?  Do your teachers need to know it?  How will you share it?  How is the perception work related to knowing the Accountability System?

Next Steps  Use the information  Communicate  Campus Visits

Evaluation

Describe Your School Through Pictures and Words

Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Edgewood ISD ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP TEAM ACADEMY AUGUST 12 – 13, 2013."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback