1. High-energy emission from the tidal disruption of stars by massive black holes Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators: K. S. Cheng(HKU), Ruo-Yu Liu(NJU) ---preliminary results

2. The basic picture Rees 1988: When r<r_t, the star is captured by the BH r_t---tidal radius Applicable to 10 6-7 M  SMBH A transient accretion disk is formed Artists conception of tidal disruption of star

3. Motivations A jet may form along the axis of the accretion disk (Cheng et al. 06) This jet may produce high-energy gamma-ray emission Use Fermi/LAT to constrain this process

4. Previous works on the jet emission Disk may produce x-ray flares (Halpern et al. 2004) Modelling with the jet-shock emission (Wong, Huang & Cheng 07) The spectrum should be very different

5. Jet-driven blast wave emission in GRB- --the afterglows  ~300

6. Our case— initial condition Jet energy (Cheng et al. 06) A long injection phase (Halpern et al. 04) Initial bulk Lorentz factor Density of surrounding medium

7. The dynamic of the blast wave

8. Synchrotron radiation The magnetic field The spectrum

9. Maximum synchrotron photon energy ---a parameter describing the efficiency of the shock acceleration Synchrotron radiation can not produce photons with energy >50 MeV !

10. Synchrotron self-Compton emission

12. The calculated flux at 100MeV Fermi/LAT sensitivity parameters E=10^52 erg t_b=3*10^6 s d=50Mpc ep_e=0.1 ep_B=0.001 n=1000 cm^-3 p=2.5

13. The expected detection rate by LAT The rate of capture events Within, the number of capture events

14. 2. Ultra-high energy cosmic rays from the jet resulted from the tidal disruption

15. Ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) Ultra-high energy cosmic rays E>10^18-10^19 eV Extragalactic origin

16. Greisen, Zatsepin and Kuzmin(GZK) effect

17. HiRes result Summary of spectral indices and break points from the fits to the HiRes monocular data ankleGZK slope below3.22 ±0.032.81 ± 0.03 break point (logE eV ) 18.65 ± 0.0419.75 ± 0.04 slope above2.81 ± 0.035.1 ± 0.7 HiRes Collaboration, PRL D. Bergman and J. Belz, arXiv:0704.3721

18. Sources: Acceleration R B v v 2R  t RF =R/  c) l =R/  22 22 [Waxman 04] AGN:  ~ few  L>10 45 erg/s GRB:  ~ 300  L>10 51 erg/s

19. AGNs as a candidate of UHECRs Hillas Plot

20. Super-galactic plane galactic coordinates Border of the f.o.v. 27 events E > 57 EeV 3.2 0 radius Véron &Véron-Cetty catalogue 442 AGN (292 in f.o.v.) z<0.017 (71 Mpc) Relative exposure Auger result

21. Auger UHECR correlation with Veron-Cetty Veron galaxies VCV catalog -- mostly AGNs, but not pure or complete L_bol : Most correlations are with too-weak AGNs (Zaw, Farrar, Greene 08) Morphology of correlated galaxies: few have jets (Moskalenko, Stawarz, Porter, Cheung 08) Standard Scenarios don’t work! Actually, no observed objects with luminosity >10^45 erg s^-1 within d=100Mpc !

22. Diffusion of the UHECRs induced by the intergalactic B CR dispersion time But, there could be past transient sources with a high luminosity above 10^45 erg/s p  D B

23. UHECR production in transient Giant AGN flares (Farrar & Gruzinov, 2008) Black Hole tidal disruption of a passing star – Occurs every 10^4-10^5 yr – In AGN, produces a Super-Eddington jet – Duration ~ debris return time, ~1 month – event energy: ~0.01 Msun > 10^52 ergs Easily achieves L > 10^45 erg/s required for UHECR acceleration

24. The maximum energy of accelerated protons particle acceleration in the blast wave

25. UHECR chemical composition--Auger result Elongation Rate measured over two decades of energy Pierre Auger Collaboration 2010, PRL Possible presence of intermediate-mass or heavy nuclei in UHECRs ? But inconsistent with HiRes result

26. Summary Stellar capture by massive BH may power a jet The jet-driven expanding blast wave can produce high- energy gamma-ray emission through SSC process, which may be detected by Fermi/LAT up to distance ~ Depending on the energy released, the expected detection rate is ~ The same jet may also accelerate UHECRs