1. MORECO-Project

2. graphics. SIR SIR graphics. SIR MORECO – Mobility and Residential Costs Smart Locations for better liveability

3. graphics. SIR SIR MORECO Mobility and Residential Costs are Closely Linked

4. low high apartment complexes private houses urban/rural centres graphics. SIR SIR Scheme of residential costs in centres and surroundings The more central, the higher housing costs will be

5. low high graphics. SIR SIR Consequence of housing costs Housing construction is attractive in remote locations

6. low high graphics. SIR SIR Scheme of private mobility costs The less central, the higher mobility costs will be

7. low high graphics. SIR SIR Efficient public transport axes help to reduce private mobility costs

8. low high graphics. SIR SIR MORECO: Steering future housing to smart locations with effective public transport and good supply facilities

9. low high graphics. SIR SIR Scenario: heavily rising mobility costs caused by rising energy prices – smart locations reduce risks

10. Cheap site, large living area Garden, green surroundings Freedom, prestige, property graphics. SIR SIR The Common Dream: A house in green surroundings

11. The solution? New house on a “cheap” location Usually only accessible by private car graphics. SIR SIR The Problem: The more central, the more expensive

12. Private costs: car(s), fuel, stress, physical inactivity Social costs: infrastructure, pollutants, noise, diseases, land consumption Risks: energy price, traffic congestions, accidents, life-cycle, property value graphics. SIR SIR The Consequence: Long distances

13. Short distances, liveable surroundings High number of pedestrians and cyclists Proximity to supply facilities and public transport Low costs for mobility graphics. SIR SIR MORECO Objective Living in smart locations

14. To support a sustainable settlement development which follows supply facilities and public transport axes. To steer future the housing market towards smart locations that offer a good quality of supply to minimise future mobility costs. graphics. SIR SIR MORECO Objective Living in smart locations

15. Cost transparency for house hunters + residential construction sector Technical + cooperative measures for spatial planners + public transport services Political/administrative strategies – local/regional – transnational Households Residential construction sector Policy-makers Spatial planners Mobility stakeholders SMART LOCATIONS SIR MORECO Methodology

16. Households Residential construction sector Policy-makers Spatial planners Mobility stakeholders SMART LOCATIONS SIR MORECO Methodology Sensitization / awareness rising Expertise actions Cooperation in order to foster new forms of governance Transfer of knowledge Operational services

17. For private individuals: household cost calculator, stress-scenarios, housing counselling For planners: regional analysis, settlement assessment, potentials for public transport For administration, housing construction sector and policy makers: slide-pool, seminars, conferences, MORECO-White Book SIR MORECO Tools

18. RALPS Governance context Issues and impact A complexity and multiplicity of actors (housing, transport, spatial planning, land use...) A difficulty to identify and understand the key factors of individual choices, and levers to influence them A need for volontarism regarding public and private decision makers and public policies The planning boundaries are not necessarily related to residential sprawl, and individual choices are not always taken in a rational and collective interest way Coordination between actors and perimeters, balance between individual needs and collective issues shall be balanced

19. 30.6. 201120122013 2014 Analysis & Expert Exchange Methodology and Tools Pilot Action Implementation Governance Strategy 1.7. SIR MORECO Steps

20. ATSIR – Salzburg Institute for Regional Planning and Housing ATStudio iSpace – Research Studios Austria Salzburg DECity of Munich, Department of Urban Planning DEIMOVE – TU Kaiserslautern, Institute for Mobility & Transport SIUIRS – Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia ITProvince of Mantua, Territorial Planning Department ITProvince of Belluno, Environment and Land Department ITUNCEM – Union of Mountain Municipalities of Piedmont Region FRRhône-Alpes Region, Planning Department FRPACTE – Territory Laboratory, University Joseph Fourier Grenoble SIR MORECO Partnership 10 partners, 5 alpine countries

21. MORECO Common Declaration Smart locations and alternative means of transport to the car for a better liveability ….. Given the findings of the project, the partners have defined the following four strategic priorities: Foster projects around existing and future public transport hubs Provide households with tools in order to rationalise their residential choices with regard to the residence/mobility costs Reduce commuting by car and encourage the use of collective means of transport Continue striving to objectively weigh up the respective costs of urban sprawl and rebuilding inner city sites or local authorities These priorities for action will be backed up and made sustainable by the creation of a network in which the MORECO partners will continue exchanging experiences and good practices. … RALPS SIR

22. SIR UNCEM MORECO White Book Lobbying and dissemination Resumé of MORECO project Synthesis of methodological approach Index cards on decision making tools + implementation in pilot regions Synthesis of governance approach and evaluation of activities

23. SIR UNCEM www.moreco-project.eu RESULTS White Book Tools Analyses Partners, Pilot Regions Press and Sensitization A library for you A collection of results