1. Journal level impact assessment a diversity of new metrics Sarah Huggett Publishing Information Manager, Scientometrics & Market Analysis, Research & Academic Relations 25 th September 2012

2. A multi-faceted journal evaluation landscape 2

3. Journal level metrics: why and how? Growth in output Appropriate use 3

4. Results of a quick poll… 4

5. Growth of scholarly communications 5 ~3% per year

6. Use of journal indicators 6 “1) For journal editors and publishing houses the impact factors give market research information. Editors are able to approximate “their” journals’ standing in comparison to other thematically closely related periodicals.” “2) For libraries impact factors are useful for collection development, especially in combination with further indicators, primarily journal prices. Combined indicators, for example, Euros per unit of impact factor or a combination of this indicator with cost-per-use, may be effective for serial selection.” 3) Authors get hints on journals in which they can publish their research results (in case there are any authors in academia who do not know “their” appropriate periodicals).” “In no case is it possible to use a journal impact factor on the article level to evaluate the influence of an article, an author or an institution.”

7. The skewness of citation distribution in journals 7 Cumulative contribution of articles with different citation rates to total journal impact.

8. 8 Citations rates vary across fields

9. 9 Citations rates vary across article types Citations Years after publication Articles Short communications Reviews 02 4 68 1012 14 1618 20

10. Popularity metrics Impact Factor Source Normalized Impact per Paper 10

11. Popularity metrics 11 Journal Citation Reports

12. Source Normalized Impact per Paper 12 Year -3Year -2Year -1 Citing year Available on Scopus Similar to Impact Factor, but considers 3 years Measures contextual citation impact Citations weighted by the likelihood of citation in the subject field of source Improvements in progress

13. Prestige metrics EigenFactor Scimago Journal Rank 13

14. Prestige metrics 14 Journal Citation Reports

15. SCImago Journal rank 15 Year -3Year -2Year -1 Citing year Freely available at scimagojr.com; on Scopus Similar to Impact Factor, but considers 3 years Self-citations limited Citations weighted by the SJR of the citing journal Improvements in progress

16. Usage MESUR COUNTER 16

17. Usage 17

18. Citation Ethics 18 Why do we cite? How should we cite?

19. 1. paying homage to pioneers; 2. giving credit for related work; 3. identifying methodology, equipment, etc.; 4. providing background reading; 5. correcting one’s own work; 6. correcting the work of others; 7. criticizing previous work; 8. substantiating claims; 9. alerting researchers to forthcoming work; 10. providing leads to poorly disseminated, poorly indexed, or uncited work; 11. authenticating data and classes of fact-physical constants, etc.; 12. identifying original publications in which an idea or concept was discussed; 13. identifying the original publication describing an eponymic concept or term, e.g. Hodgkin’s disease; 14. disclaiming work or ideas of others; 15. disputing priority claims of others. Citations: “a private process with a public face” 19 “Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation”  Coercive citations  Citation cartels

20. The metrics of the future? 20

21. A multi-dimensional picture 21 IF SJR ImInd h-index EF

22. A multi-faceted journal evaluation landscape 22 Thank you for your attention Any questions or comments?