Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAmbrose Malone Modified over 9 years ago
1
Welcome to UShop!
2
Sub 70% contract compliance Paper-based Inefficient Not transparent Dysfunctional vendor management $70M annual Pcard spend that requires paper processing of each transaction
3
Annual paper-based transaction volume 92,000 Suppliers 25,000 Purchase Orders 315,000 Invoices 56,000 Direct Payments Majority of payments made by paper check Overall lack of data availability
4
Too many different ways to procure and pay – all paper based Requisition and Purchase Order PCard Limited Purchase Order Payment Request UShop replaces all of these
5
Eleven of the twelve schools utilize some form of electronic workflow for procurement, and nine of these use SciQuest. SciQuest is used extensively throughout Division 1 schools. Ushop is a low risk/high impact project.
6
Electronic workflow – Requisitions, PO’s, and Invoices Increased velocity and transparency Reduction of paper Detailed audit trail for all transactions Directs spend to existing contracts Allows better vendor management and strategic sourcing UShop integrated with University electronic approvals
7
State of Utah procurement code University procurement regulations Required approvals for financial transactions Accountability for funds
8
OUR GOAL: IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AT EACH STEP OF THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
11
We have analyzed current state versus UShop procurement, step by step. We have documented both processes. When viewed side-by-side, the advantages of UShop, and the reduced effort and steps are very clear.
13
UShop Catalog Suppliers allow us to capture spend and leverage contracts, plus provide; Contract pricing E-Invoicing Free shipping Very easy and positive user experience Updated shipping and delivery information
14
Biochemistry Human Genetics Mechanical Engineering University Information Technology (UIT)
15
408 Requisitions, totaling $7,675,101
16
Positive University financial approvals and routing are integrated Funding sources validated at time of entry Catalog supplier marketplace very easy to use Areas of concern The availability of preferred suppliers in UShop System provides too many notifications Transparency of the system has revealed some lags both in individual departments and central administration Need for internal suppliers (e.g. Campus Store)
17
Chemistry Financial & Business Services Human Resources & Payroll Academic Outreach Continuing Education College of Architecture Marriott Library College of Nursing College of Pharmacy University Student Apartments
18
Phase 1 completed Phase 2 – now through August 24 Onboard and train new departments Increase UShop utilization in Phase 1 departments Collect department feedback and provide support Phase 3 – September 2015 into 2016 Onboard and train new departments Add new functionality, such as internal suppliers Consider large systems, such as Hospital, HCI, Facilities
19
Electronic workflow – Requisitions, PO’s, and Invoices Ease of use Transparent processing Reduced paper volume Faster processing Strategic sourcing Data-driven analytics
20
This is a large-scale change management project. A recognition that the current process is very expensive, inefficient, and does not represent good stewardship of the funds entrusted to the University. Documented increase in contract compliance and strategic sourcing. UShop must provide fast transaction processing - high velocity. Consistent communication of the benefits of UShop to the departments, the University, and the suppliers. Demonstrated savings to the institution
22
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.