1. Subjects of International Law

2. States as Subjects of International Law
"Under international law, a state is an entity that has a defined territory and a permanent population, under the control of its own government, and that engages in, or has the capacity to engage in, formal relations with other such entities." The Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations

3. States as Subjects of International Law
Declaratory Theory The proposition that a state has capacity (and personality) in international law as soon as it exists in fact (that is, when it becomes competent in municipal law). This capacity is generated spontaneously from the assertion by the community that it is a judicial entity. When socially organized, the new state is internally legally organized, and hence competent to act in such a way as to engage itself in international responsibility. Thus, according to this theory, recognition does not create any state that did not already exist.

4. States as Subjects of International Law
Declaratory Theory
If entity meets criteria of statehood, immediately
enjoys rights and duties as a state States can exist
without recognition.
Recognition is merely declaratory
Most nations support this theory

5. States as Subjects of International Law
Declarative theory defines a state as a person in international law if it meets the following criteria: 1) a defined territory; 2) a permanent population; 3) a government and; 4) a capacity to enter into relations with other states. According to declarative theory, an entity's statehood is independent of its recognition by other states. The declarative model was most famously expressed in the 1933 Montevideo Convention, and is recognized in OAS Charter, and is part of the Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations.

6. States as Subjects of International Law
The Criteria
a permanent population; there must be some people to establish the existence of a State but there is not a specification of a minimum number of people and again there is not a requirement that all of the people be national of the state.
b) territory; the second qualification is territory where the permanent population live on. However, there is not a necessity of having well- established boundaries.

7. States as Subjects of International Law
The Criteria c) government; A State requires a government that functions as a political body within the law of the land. But it is not a condition precedent for recognition as an independent State. d) capacity to enter into relations with other states; the fourth and last qualification is about independency, in other words independence is indicated by the criterion of capacity to enter into relations with other states.

8. States as Subjects of International Law
Constitutive Theory Act of recognition confers international personality Recognition is an element of statehood If there is no recognition: no rights and/or duties. The constitutive theory of statehood defines a state as a person of international law if, and only if, it is recognized as sovereign by other states. Problems arise when some states recognize a new entity, but other states do not. While a state has no obligation, many states may only recognize another state if it is to their advantage.

9. States as Subjects of International Law
The constitutive theory asserts that States and governments do not legally exist until recognized by the international community and the declaratory theory adopts that States and governments gain in the international personality when they come into existence.

10. States as Subjects of International Law
In 1971 the International Law Commission stated that collective recognition “means that States act collectively during the process of receiving information of the situation, evaluating that information and reaching a decision, and communicating that decision.”
Survey of international law - Working Paper prepared by the Secretary-General in the light of the decision of the Commission to review its program of work” Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:-1971, vol. II(2), p.18

11. States as Subjects of International Law
Collective Recognition Recognition has a political side, in practice the States prefer a middle way between these two doctrine; in addition to classic qualifications to seek some basic requirements of international law for recognition. In the past, it was sufficient for a new State to fulfill the four criteria. In 1930s some States also looked for that a new State must obey some fundamental standards of the international community.

12. States as Subjects of International Law
As an example for recent times, in the European Communities Declaration on the "Guidelines on the Recognition of new States in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union" it is indicated that “The Community and its member States adopt a common position on the process of recognition of these new States, which requires: - respect for the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations and the commitments subscribed to in the Final Act of Helsinki and in the Charter of Paris, especially with regard to the rule of law, democracy and human rights;

13. States as Subjects of International Law
guarantees for the rights of ethnic and national groups and minorities in accordance with the commitments subscribed to in the framework of the CSCE
- respect for the inviolability of all frontiers which can only be changed by peaceful means and by common agreement;

14. States as Subjects of International Law
- acceptance of all relevant commitments with regard to disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation as well as to security and regional stability; - commitment to settle by agreement, including where appropriate by recourse to arbitration, all questions concerning State succession and regional disputes. The Community and its member States will not recognize entities which are the result of aggression.”

15. States as Subjects of International Law
Who Decides What is a State Other States Restatement (Third) 201 U.S. President Const. Art. II, implied by the authority to receive Ambassadors

16. States as Subjects of International Law
Duty to Recognize The general rule is no duty exist to recognize another state. Duty to Not Recognize A state has not satisfied the criteria of statehood Existence of an entity violates fundamental principles of law, e.g., a state formed out of aggression.

17. States as Subjects of International Law
Recognition of Government Formal acknowledgment that a particular regime is the effective government of the state. No International agreed guidelines. Questions of a new government arise? A new government assumes power in a manner that violates domestic law. Recognition involves a mix of international law and politics.

18. States as Subjects of International Law
Problems or issues may arise when a new government comes to power by illegal means, such as a coup d'etat, or when an existing government stays in power by fixing an election. States once formally recognized both the government of a state and the state itself, but there may be a split in recognition statehood but not a government.

19. States as Subjects of International Law
Examples of States with limited recognition Republic of China (Taiwan) State of Palestine Israel Republic of Kosovo

20. Subjects of International Law
Traditionally, international law had states as its sole subjects. With the rise in the number of international organizations after the Second World War, they have been recognized as its subjects as well. Other developments in international human rights law, international humanitarian law and international trade law led to individuals and corporations being subjects of international law.

21. Subjects of International Law
Fifty years ago it was generally admitted that “ States are the only legal persons of international law”, but today conception is rather different, the participants can be regarded as; states, non-state actors, international organizations, regional organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), public companies, private companies and individuals.

22. International Legal Personality
International legal personality infers rights and duties governed by international law. International Organizations can make and enter into treaties. Nongovernmental organizations are recognized under international law.

23. International Legal Personality
The United Nations exercise privileges and immunities without comparable obligations demonstrates the inequity of applying standards based on status, rather than function. Although the United Nations is not beholden to the same human rights standards as States, it enjoys many of the benefits given to States, such as privileges and immunities.

24. International Legal Personality
United Nations UN Charter, Art. 104 notes the organizations legal capacity: The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary for the exercise of its functions and the fulfillment of its purposes.

25. International Legal Personality
UN Charter, Art. 105 notes the organizations privileges and immunities:
The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the fulfillment of its purposes.
Representatives of the Members of the United Nations and officials of the Organization shall similarly enjoy such privileges and immunities as are necessary for the independent exercise of their functions in connection with the Organization.

26. International Legal Personality
Individuals The UN Charter repeatedly states the organization’s commitment to human rights and social justice. In several provisions, the Charter reiterates the need for awareness and respect for human rights. In its preamble, the UN Charter clarifies that part of its purpose is "to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights" and "to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained." (the preamble is not binding)

27. International Legal Personality
Individuals Historically, individuals were not subjects of international law until after the Second World War. State sovereignty gave way to international law recognizing basic human rights. States are reluctant to recognize individual rights outside their national legal systems. Norms of international law are expressed in treaties that states have agreed to recognize when ratifying agreements as members of an organization.

28. International Legal Personality
Individuals The general rule is that individuals do not have standing or access to file complaints in international courts or tribunals. An exception to the general rule is based on a treaty provision that recognizes the right of an individual to appear before an international court.

29. International Legal Personality
Individuals Individuals are subject to compliance with international law. Someone who commits an international crime can be punished in accord with international law. These crimes include: Piracy; Slave-trading; Genocide; and Other crimes such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, and torture.