Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRoland Elliott Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov NASCSP 2011 Mid-Winter Training Conference March 3, 2011 Bruce Tonn Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)
2
2 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Inspector General and General Accountability Office Status of Retrospective Evaluation Presenter: Bruce Tonn
3
3 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov 100% Response to State Program Information Survey 91% Response to All Agencies Program Information Survey 85% Response to Subset of Agencies Detailed Program Information Survey Requests are being made for detailed weatherization data Requests for billing histories are going out to utilities Bulk Fuels and Indoor Air Quality Studies are underway Status of Retrospective Evaluation
4
4 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Radon Study Approach
5
5 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Preliminary Radon Results: 298 Homes Pre-Weatherization Basement/CrawlspaceLowest Main Living Level Radon Stratumn mean (pC/l)s.e. % > 4 pC/ln me an (pC /l)s.e. % > 4 pC/l 1 (low)130.50.20% 22 0.30.10% 2 (mid)602.70.520% 99 1.50.28% 3 (high, per EPA or LBL) 704.10.537% 100 2.30.318% 4 (high, per EPA and LBL) 464.50.639% 59 2.90.322%
6
6 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Preliminary Formaldehyde Results: Some consider.10 ppm as risk
7
7 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Reprise State/Agency surveys for PY10 National Energy Savings Estimates for PY09-11 Focused evaluations of: –Weatherization Innovation Pilot Project –Sustainable Energy Resources for Consumers Project Special Studies: –Energy Savings Persistence –Deferrals –Territories –Under-performers –Social Network impacts of weatherization WAP ARRA Period Evaluation Planning is Underway
8
8 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov State surveys and communications Database migration Sampled agency data collection Data Collection Lessons Learned
9
9 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Continuing the “case management” approach: –Dedicated case manager for states and subgrantees –Notify states before new data requests are sent to subgrantees –Follow up regarding slow/unresponsive subgrantees New approaches for fiscal data collection: –Assistance in mapping available data to survey questions –Evaluation team can work directly with fiscal staff WAP ARRA Period Evaluation: State Surveys and Communications
10
10 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Retrospective evaluation: –19 state databases migrated for unit-level data Demographics Utility account info Building characteristics Diagnostics & measures Costs –189 sampled agencies had survey burden reduced ARRA evaluation: –More databases –More comprehensive datasets –Codebooks are helpful! Database Migration
11
11 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Centralized data collection process: WI case study –State office used T&TA contractor to complete the Utility Info Survey and Housing Info Survey 9 sampled agencies 955 units ~400 hours of effort Key’s to success: –T&TA funds –Game plan –Orientation to agency files –Evaluation team can provide training support Sampled Agency Data Collection
12
12 | Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective (Part 2)eere.energy.gov Bruce Tonn Oak Ridge National Laboratory bet@ornl.gov (865) 574-4041 Claire Cowan Energy Center of Wisconsin ccowan@ecw.org (608) 238-8276 x117 Contact Info
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.