1. Report of HLRF KOM S. Fukuda

6. Project Management Structure Area: Main Linac Technology (to be completed) Regional/Intsitutional Effort: - Director-US: Mike Harrison - Director-EU: B. Foster - Director-AS: M. Nozaki Technical Effort (ML (SCRF) Technology): - Project Manager: A. Yamamoto - Associate Managers: T. Shidara, J. Kerby, * Group leader, ** Co-leader RegionsInstituteInstitute Leaders Cavity (Process) L. Lilje* Cavity (Prod./Int.) H. Hayano* Cryomodule N. Ohuchi* -H. Carter** Cryogenics T. Peterson HLRF S. Fukuda* ML Integr. C. Adolphsen US Cornell Fermilab SLAC ANL J-lab H.Padamsee R. Kephart T.Raubenhaimer H.Padamsee C.Adolphsen H.CarterT.PetersonO. Nezhevenko R. Larsen/ C.A.C. Adolphsen EU DESY CERN Saclay Orsay INFN Spain R.Brinkman J. Delahaye O. Napoly A.Variola C. Pagani L.Lilje C. Pagani Parma Franco Pal. Tavian S. Choroba AS KEK Korea Inst. IHEP India Inst. K.YokoyaNoguchi, Saito HayanoTsuchiya/ Ohuchi Hosoyama/ Nakai Fukuda

7. Technical Responsibilities : (from RDR Chapter 7) Green indicates a commitment: –institute will deliver MoUs facilitate connection: – Project Management (authority and responsibility) and institutions (funding and resources). The ‘C’  coordinating role in a WP –Each WP has one coordinator. Technical responsibility

8. High Level RF Groups Organization for EDR-tasks ModulatorKlystron PDSControl,,, US Cornell Fermilab SLAC ANL J-lab C. Jensen R. Larsen C. Burkhart C. Adolphsen E. Jongewaard C. Nantista O. Nezhevenko B. Chase R. Cassel EU DESY CEA-Saclay -Olsay INFN Spain CERN V. VogelS. ChorobaV. Katalev AS KEK Korea Inst. IHEP India Inst. M. Akemoto T. Shidara S. Fukuda M. Yoshida H.S. Kim S. Fukuda/S. Kazakov

9. HLRF– EDR Tasks and Discussions in KOM Base-line Design and interface parameters to be verified, –Functional design parameters and interface to be unified, –What have to be achieved and what have to be maintained?, –What can be plug-compatibly improved?, –How the tasks can be shared among sub-groups?, Critical Goal: –Technology to achieve E-op = 31.5 MV/m, reliably Otherwise, need to reduce the gradient or adjust the machine design Need a vital program of both R&D and demonstrations Important Work at HLRF tasks –System optimization for the best “value engineering” –R&D for Marx Generator, ACD-PDS, SBK,

10. Summary for Charges Basic design parameters and Interfaces to be verified, EDR design work and R&D (goal) –Basic R&D to be completed –Learning mass production Discussions towards –“unified design/specification” and/or “”plug-compatible design/specification Task sharing and schedule –Work-package definition and assignment –Strategy for open discussions and information,

12. Overview talk Choroba (DESY) Recent status of DESY was reported MBK Klystron, H-MBK delivery, modulator from additional vendor, HV cable test with bouncer mod. At higher potential, New PDS with symmetrical shunt tee, Fukuda (KEK) Recent status of STF 0.5-1.0 in KEK was reported. STF 0.5 and 1.0 plan, 3 BCD modulators test Nezhevenko (FNAL) FNAL modulator Status was reported Addolphsen (SLAC) US Activity for ILC-ML was reported. Imortant ke tech. were covered by individual talk.

14. Technical discussion Jongewaard /SBK Yoshida/Super MBK Katalev/DESY PDS Nantista/SLAC PDS Burkhart/Marx Modulator in SLAC Akemoto/Bouncer Modulator in KEK Cassel/HA Charging System

15. WP for HLRF

16. Technical highlight

17. Super-MBK KEK

24. Heat problem Emil Hueden showed the heat table with marked uncompleted (should be revised) parts.--  responsible person Klystron-Fukuda PDS-C. Nantista Modulator- C. Jensen Charger – R. Cassel

25. We’re ask to evaluate LCW water system delta T. In order to evaluate this (and confirm cost savings), we need more info on the water cooled component and we ask your help in updating or getting more information for each of those items. Getting the table filled will be helpful, but as minimum, the following for each water cooled components are needed combination of either one of the following (Load/Flow, or Load/Delta T or Flow/Delta T) Maximum allowable temperature Pressure drop (corresponding to a given flow) If possible, information to be given is agreed upon by the group We appreciate Shigeki-san’s help in getting the information started

26. Snapshot Nov 27 2006

28. Shin’s Talk

29. Review existing EDR Engineering plans (specs, costing, vendors) STF Plan Engineering, Industrialization (Fukuda) STF2&STF3, WP’s for them, Industrialization for Asian region US ART Work Package (Adolphsen) US WP List, Related person list EDR Management Work Packages (Non R&D) (Larsen) Concerning with this talk, there discussed the relation between the EDR and R&D.

31. Two Task Categories for each WP 1.EDR WP - Management: Subsystem Engineering leaders perform following tasks: 1.R&D & Overall Project Plans 2.Cost Analysis & Schedules 3.Manufacturing & Installation Models 4.Develop EDR Report 5.Develop Bid Packages for all Regions (w/R&D) 6.Build-to-print for first ACD’s 7.Recommend down-selection (or not) 2.R&D WP – ACD Prototypes: Organize collaboration, design, build, test prototypes Documentation for Build-to-Print, Specifications Develop Vendors via prototype procurement Assist Bid Package development. Industry liaison Definitions: Management & R&D WP’s

34. EDR Challenge EDR definition implies that interim 08-10 period must be sufficiently staffed, funded to achieve “EDR Readiness” by 2010. Requires leadership, strong contributions and collaboration from all Regions Requires active involvement of industrial partners Building inter-regional and lab-industry collaboration through Work Packages critical to meeting EDR goals. V. EDR Work Packages

35. R&D WP Project Management Team Region 1 Region 2 Sub Project 1 Region 1 Sub Project 2 Region 2 Example Collaboration Concept EDR WP Joint Management Team Region 1 Region 2 Region 1 EDR WP Support Region 2 EDR WP Support Management Model Joint teams may require co-location for some overlap period Single lead managers optional also Sub-projects in different regions include low level or high-level projects (e.g. Design a controller; Build a klystron or modu- lator with Regional industry Management WP’s R&D WP’s

36. R&D WP Summary Remarks Technical Challenges –ACD R&D vital to cost reduction, performance improvements –Most modern technology available needed for ILC in all areas for HA designs Collaboration Challenges –Forming effective inter-Regional R&D project engineering teams essential –Transition from prototypes to industry essential

37. Technical efforts to EDR Complete the critical R&D –as identified by the (R & D Board and), Prototype, DFM, Preproduction, and.. Establish the base-line design, –Verify the initial EDR base-line design parameters, –Technologies to be chosen and to be demonstrated through pre-mass- production –Learn industrialization Obtain the maximum benefit from the realized project Proceed alternate design and development –As technology back-up to achieve the ILC design goal, with “Plug-compatible” concept, and for maximizing performance/cost (value-engineering)