1. 2014-15 Data Riverside Community Schools

2. Schoolwide Trends 2014-15 Riverside Community Schools

3. Schoolwide Reading Trends

4. Schoolwide Math Trends

5. Schoolwide Science Trends

6. Schoolwide Social Studies Trends

7. Schoolwide Written Expression Trends

8. Gradewise Proficiencies 2014-15 Riverside Community Schools

9. Gradewise Proficiencies - Reading

10. Gradewise Proficiencies - Math

11. Gradewise Proficiencies - Science

12. Gradewise Proficiencies – Social Studies

13. Gradewise Proficiencies – Written Expression

14. District Proficiency Levels Riverside Community Schools

15. Reading Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) 20% or 435, or 87 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, are non-proficient in reading. In 2014, we had 18% of 438, or 78 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, that were non-proficient in reading. In 2013 we had 24% of 442, or 106 students, that were non-proficient in reading.

16. Math Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) 14% of 435, or 61 students, in 2 nd -11 th grade were non-proficient in math. In 2014, 15% of 438, or 65 students, were non-proficient in math. In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students were non-proficient in math.

17. Science Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) In 2015, 18% of 435, or 78 student, in 2 nd -11 th grades were non-proficient in science. In 2014, 17% of 438, or 75 students were non-proficient in science. In 2013, In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students were non-proficient in science.

18. District Proficiency Levels - FAY Riverside Community Schools

19. Reading Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11- FAY (n=410)

20. Math Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11- FAY (n=410)

21. Science Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11- FAY (n=410)

22. Class Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

23. Class of 2025 – 2nd Graders

24. 2 nd Grade

25. Class of 2024 – 3rd Graders

26. 3 rd Grade

27. Class of 2023 – 4th Graders

28. 4 th Grade

29. Class of 2022 – 5th Graders

30. 5 th Grade

31. Class of 2021 – 6 th Graders

32. 6 th Grade

33. Class of 2020 – 7 th Graders

34. 7 th Grade

35. Class of 2019 – 8 th Graders

36. 8 th Grade

37. Class of 2018 – 9 th Graders

38. 9 th Grade

39. Class of 2017 – 10 th Graders

40. 10 th Grade

41. Class of 2016 – 11 th Graders

42. 11 th Grade

43. Grade Level Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

44. 2 nd Grade Proficiency Trends

46. 3 rd Grade Proficiency Trends

48. 4 th Grade Proficiency Trends

50. 5 th Grade Proficiency Trends

52. 6 th Grade Proficiency Trends

54. 7 th Grade Proficiency Trends

56. 8 th Grade Proficiency Trends

58. 9 th Grade Proficiency Trends

60. 10 th Grade Proficiency Trends

62. 11 th Grade Proficiency Trends

64. Gaps Riverside Community Schools

65. SES Gaps Riverside Community Schools

66. SES - Reading Proficiency Gaps

67. SES - Math Proficiency Gaps

68. SES - Science Proficiency Gaps

69. Gender Gaps Riverside Community Schools

70. Gender - FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps

71. Gender – Math Proficiency Gaps

72. Gender – Science Proficiency Gaps

73. IEP Gaps Riverside Community Schools

74. IEP – Reading Proficiency Gaps

75. IEP – Math Proficiency Gaps

76. IEP – Science Proficiency Gaps

77. FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

78. SES - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

79. SES FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=18%

80. SES FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=17%

81. SES FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=14%

82. Gender - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

83. Gender FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =13%

84. Gender FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =1%

85. Gender FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =0%

86. IEP - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

87. IEP FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=41%

88. IEP FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=41%

89. IEP FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=20%

90. Gap Trendlines Riverside Community Schools

91. SES Schoolwide Gap Trends- Reading

92. SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

93. SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

94. IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

95. IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

96. IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

97. Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

98. Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

99. Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

100. Collapsed Grade Levels Riverside Community Schools

101. Reading Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

102. Math Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

103. Science Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

104. Reading Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

105. Math Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

106. Science Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

107. Goals Riverside Community Schools

108. Long-Range Goals Goal 1: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in reading comprehension, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 2: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in mathematics, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 3: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in science, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 4 All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in social studies, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 5: All K-12 students will use integrated technology as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 6: All students will feel safe at and connected to school. Goal 7: All K-12 students will use integrated 21st century skills as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 8: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in written expression, prepared for success beyond high school.

109. Elementary School Annual Goals for 2014-15 Reading Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade (2013-2014) will show proficiency on IA TIER in 3 rd grade (2014-2015). How We Did: We had 80% of our students be proficient on the FAST Reading Assessment in the 3 rd Grade class. Math Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade (2013-2014) will show growth on NSS in 3 rd grade (2014-2015) in Math. How We Did: We had 55% of our 3 rd grade students showed growth on the NSS Math assessment. Science Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade (2013-2014) will show growth on NSS in 3 rd grade (2014-2015) in Science. How We Did: 47% of the FAY 3 rd grade students showed growth on the NSS Science assessment.

110. Intermediate School Annual Goals for 2014-15 Reading Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Reading How We Did: We had 36 out of 44 FAY students show growth which was 80%. Math Goal: Math: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Math How We Did: We had 31 out of 36 FAY students show growth which was 86%. Science Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Science How We Did: We had 47 out of 53 FAY students show growth which was 88%. Social Studies Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Social Studies. How We Did: We had 21 out of 28 FAY students show growth which was 75%.

111. Jr./Sr. High School Annual Goals for 2014-15 Reading Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Reading. How we did: 29 out of 38 students, so 76% of non-proficient students made growth on the 2014-15 Reading Iowa Assessments. Math Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Math. How we did: 32 out of 35 students, so 91% of non-proficient students made growth on the 2014-15 Math Iowa Assessments. Science Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Science. How we did: 37 out of 44 students, so 84% of non-proficient students made growth on the 2014-15 Science Iowa Assessments. Social Studies Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2013-14 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2014-15 test in Social Studies. How we did: 39 out of 47 students, so 83% of non-proficient students made growth on the 2014-15 Social Studies Iowa Assessments

112. Elementary School Annual Goals for 2015-16 Reading Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students (2015-2016) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Reading score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In 2014-2015 there were 10 students who were non proficient. (12 students around the bubble of proficiency) Math Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students (2015-2016) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Math score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In 2014-2015 there were 13 students who were non proficient. (10 students around the bubble of proficiency) Science Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students (2015-2016) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Science score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In 2014-2015 there were 13 students who were non proficient. (5 students around the bubble of proficiency) Social Studies: FAY 3 rd Grade students (2015-2016) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Social Studies score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In 2014- 2015 there were 20 students who were non proficient. (5 students around the bubble of proficiency) Written Expression: FAY 3 rd Grade students (2015-2016) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Written Expression score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In 2014-2015 there were 12 students who were non proficient. (12 students around the bubble of proficiency)

113. Intermediate School Annual Goals for 2015-16 Reading: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Reading. Math: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Math. Science: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Science. Social Studies: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Social. Written Expression: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Written Expression.

114. Jr./Sr. High School Annual Goals for 2015-16 Reading: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Reading. Math: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Math. Science: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Science. Social Studies: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Social Studies. Written Expression: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the 2014-15 Iowa Assessment will show growth on the 2015-16 test in Written Expression.