Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHubert Chandler Modified over 9 years ago
1
BASIC STATISTICS: AN OXYMORON? (With a little EPI thrown in…) URVASHI VAID MD, MS AUG 2012
3
OUTLINE Definition Why do we need to know “statistics”? – Validity- external and internal – Reliability – Sensitivity – Specificity – Positive and negative predictive values ROC curves
4
STATISTICS “the science that deals with the collection, classification, analysis, and interpretation of numerical facts or data, and that, by use of mathematical theories of probability, imposes order and regularity on aggregates of more or less disparate elements”
5
BUT WHY?
6
To effectively conduct research To read and evaluate journals To develop critical and analytical thinking To be an informed consumer To know your limits
7
Population Sample Treatment group A vs Treatment group B Inference Sampling
8
POPULATION Target Population Eg smokers Study Population (eligible) Eg Ages 55-74 yrs, ≥ 30 pack years Study Sample (enrolled) Eg geographic area, site, consent Target Population Study Population Study Sample
9
Mean, Median and Mode
10
Measures of dispersion Range Standard deviation- Bell’s curve Others
11
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
12
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY-quality of measurements
13
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
14
GENERALIZABILITY Also “External Validity” how representative of the target population is the study population and study sample? Based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and standard of care Where When Who (subjects) What (treatments, outcomes) How (assessments, data collection)
15
INTERNAL VALIDITY or no “bias” Estimated effect in study sample is accurate reflection of true effect in underlying study population Can be in jeopardy due “Systematic Error” – Selection or allocation bias – Information or recall bias or treatment related bias – Confounding – Cross over or lost to follow up Deal with this by creating a good study design and statistics Also- randomize, blind, quality control, adjust for co- variates
16
RANDOMIZATION Balances groups on known and unknown risk factors in the long run Provides statistical basis for estimation and testing Effort, time, cost Ethics – patient wants “best” treatment – physician wants to tailor treatment to individual patient Clinical Equipoise?
17
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
19
H 0 : Null Hypothesis--There is no association between an exposure and outcome H 1 : Alternative Hypothesis--There is an association between an exposure and outcome In general, epidemiologists attempt to reject the null One-sided (higher or lower) vs two-sided (different)
20
H 0 True (No Association) H 1 True (There is an Association) Do Not Reject H 0 Correct Decision Type II Error ( β ) Reject H 0 Type I Error ( α ) Correct Decision TRUTH DECISIONDECISION
21
Type I error (false positive, α) probability of rejecting null hypothesis, when it is true Type II error (false negative, β) probability of not rejecting null hypothesis, when it is false Power (1-β) probability of rejecting null hypothesis, when it is false
22
POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE Ensure study worth doing and feasible Have to consider – study design – outcome (distribution, variability, etc.) – hypothesis to be tested (superiority, equivalence, etc.) – statistical analysis to be performed – clinically relevant/meaningful effect size to be detected Larger the effect size, smaller the sample size needed More subjects more power!
23
Measures of diagnostic test performance
24
SENSITIVITY A test’s ability to identify diseased individuals Probability of a positive test among those with disease
25
SPECIFICITY A test’s ability to rule out disease Probability of a negative test among those without disease
26
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY ARE FIXED ASPECTS OF A TEST DO NOT CHANGE BASED ON DISEASE PREVALENCE
27
Disease +Disease -Total Test +TPFPTP+FP Test -FNTNFN+TN TotalTP+FNFP+TN TP+FP+FN+TN Sensitivity = True Positive /Those with disease = TP/(TP+FN) Specificity = True Negative/Those without disease = TN/(TN+FP)
28
EXAMPLE 200 patients D-dimer positive in 50 CT angio positive in 60 CT angio and d-dimer negative in 120 Construct a 2 X 2 table and calculate sensitivity and specificity.
29
PENo PE D-dimer positive50 D-dimer negative120 60200
30
PENo PE D-dimer positive302050 D-dimer negative30120150 60140200
31
PENo PE D-dimer positive302050 D-dimer negative30120150 60140200 Sensitivity= TP/TP+FN= 30/30+30=50% Specificity= TN/TN+FP= 120/120+20= 85%
32
POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE The probability of having disease given a positive test: P(D+|T+) ‘How likely is it that this patient has the disease given that the test result is positive?’ Calculated as: (TRUE POSITIVE)/(TRUE POSITIVE + FALSE POSITIVE) Sensitivity is the probability of test positive given disease: P(T+|D+)
33
Disease +Disease -Total Test +26733 Test -9717011798 Total12317081831 What is the PPV?
34
NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE The probability of not having disease given a negative test: P(D-|T-) ‘How likely is it that this patient does not have the disease given that the test result is negative?’ Calculated as: (TRUE NEGATIVE)/(TRUE NEGATIVE + FALSE NEGATIVE) Specificity is the probability of testing negative given no disease: P(T-|D-)
35
Disease +Disease -Total Test +26733 Test -9717011798 Total12317081831 What is the NPV?
36
Sensitivity and specificity are characteristics of tests themselves Predictive values (positive and negative) are functions of both test characteristics and prevalence
37
EFFECT OF PREVALENCE 4000 people, of which 2000 are ill and 2000 well A screening test with 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity will yield 1980 TP and 1980 TN and only 20 each for FP and FN Hence PPV is 99%. What if the number of ill people is only 200? Then well people are 3800 and FP increase to 38 and PPV falls to 84%
38
Disease +Disease - Test +1980202000 Test -2019802000 4000 Disease +Disease - Test +19838236 Test -237623764 20038004000
39
ROC Receiver operator characteristic curves are a plot of false positives against true positives for all cut-off values The area under the curve of a perfect test is 1.0 and that of a useless test, no better than tossing a coin, is 0.5
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.