1. 2010-13 Reflections on Evaluation and Continuous Improvement: Differentiated Instruction (DI) RCOE Division of Educational Services Mike Barney: Director II Melissa Bazanos: Administrator Russell Frank: Director II Kris Nicholls: Coordinator Maritza Rodriguez: Ass’t Dean & Director of Teacher Education: UCR Kira Shearer: Coordinator

2. Questions for Regional Partners What lessons about sustainability or institutionalization can you offer? What about technology integration can you recommend?

3. DI Implementation Influences Research-based practices for teaching literacy, especially effective with ELs, connected to or building on LEA/site pre-existing PD context Implementation Science: Fixsen Influencer

4. 2010-11 RSIU Unit Goals Increase the percent of English Learners: Scoring proficient or higher in ELA as measured by district benchmarks. * Scoring proficient or higher on CST in ELA and math. Achieving English proficiency as measured by CELDT

5. How Did We Do with Our Goals? 2009-12 CST Data Riv Cty CA ELA ’0934.333.3 ’1240.5 40.6 Gain 6.2 7.3 Math ’0943.242.8 ’1249.048.8 Gain 5.8 6.7 09-12 CELDT English Proficient Riv Cty Sta Cl Cty ’093739 ’124143 Gain 4 4 District benchmark assessments are a challenge to measure growth.

6. 2013-14 DI Goal Implement DI to facilitate transition to Common Core State Standards/ ELD Standards

7. 2010: What We Did Provide 18 hours of EL-focused DI professional development to eligible PI schools in eligible districts. Provide principal coaching during walk-throughs to support implementation and monitoring of DI. Funded through Regional System of District and School Support.

8. 2013: What’s Been Added? Year 2: Lesson planning process. Deeper rigor and principal coaching. Originally developed to help EL students – helps all. Learning Walks. Year 3: Deepen lesson planning. Focus more on CCSS. More trouble-shooting with principal and DO. LEA/site develops own monitoring docs and Learning Walks

9. Memorandum of Understanding MOU guides support & accountability for: Assistant Superintendent Directors Principals Coaches Teachers RSIU Staff

10. Memorandum of Understanding MOU outlines responsibi- lities for most Implemen - tation Science Drivers: Training Coaching Systems Intervention Facilitative Intervention Decision Support Data Adaptive/Technical Leadership

11. Data Add chart here. What Did We Deliver? Differentiated Instruction 2010-2011 Training Data DistrictSites Number of Teachers Number of Walk- Throughs Number of Trainings Number of English Learner (EL) Students Alvord USD4123430251760 Beaumont USD26436420453 Perris ESD827066518 Romoland SD4135400151306 San Jacinto USD6632206737 Totals246552079696815

12. Data Add chart here. What Did We Deliver? Differentiated Instruction 2012-2013 Training Data District Sites 10-13 Number of Teachers 12-13 Number of Walk- Throughs 12-13 Number of Trainings 12-13 Number of English Learner (EL) Students 10-13 Alvord USD 1214824464411 Banning USD 49512 438 Beaumont USD 4 157140606 Hemet 1547945621967 Menifee 3951210246 Perris ESD 85412*133071 Romoland 412562794 Totals50115312514511533

13. What Works? Defining the “ What”: Revised Practice Profiles

14. What Works? Revised Lesson Plan Organizer

15. 2010-13 Lessons Learned From Walkthrus to Learning Walks Building on or connection to existing district/site PD context Principal and RCOE staff dialogue w/ teacher On learning walks teachers see for themselves why the school might be stalled. From Walkthrus to Learning Walks How someone else does it “with kids like mine”. If numbers get in the way take them out. It’s about the conversation that moves implementation ahead. “Come back in 10 minutes, I want to show you something.”

16. Learning Walks Learning from peers in authentic settings Observing high levels of learning for all students Melissa Bazanos Administrator Riverside County Office of Education

17. What Works? Teacher Reflection on DI Implementation: Innovation Created by a school in year 3. Customized Used in that school.

18. What Works? Reflection Prompts: Innovation

19. What Works? Observation Matrix: Innovation

20. What Works? Shopping List

21. What Works? Tech Apps. Not about using tech for implemen- tation data Photos & videos of implementation used at trainings show rich variations. Celebrate good work.

22. What Works? Tech Apps.

23. What Didn’t Work District Implosion is Bad: Teachers Principals DO No Expectation for Follow-up Morale

24. What Works? Improved Student Achievement

27. Questions for Regional Partners What lessons about sustainability or institutionalization can you offer? What about technology integration can you recommend?