Download presentation
Published byAsher Underwood Modified over 9 years ago
1
Numerical Studies of Stall and Surge Alleviation in Compressors
Alex Stein, Saeid Niazi, and Lakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Supported by the U.S. Army Research Office Under the Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) on Intelligent Turbine Engines
2
Overview Objectives and Motivation Rotating Stall and Surge
Flow Solver and Boundary Conditions DLR High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor Unsteady Surge Simulations Surge Control Using Air-Injection NASA Axial Rotor 67 Results Peak Efficiency Conditions Off-design Conditions Bleed Valve Control Conclusions
3
Objectives and Motivation
Lines of Constant Rotational Speed Efficiency Choke Limit Surge Limit Flow Rate Total Pressure Rise Desired Extension of Operating Range Develop a numerical scheme to model and understand compressor stall and surge. Explore active and passive control strategies (Bleed Valve, Air-Injection) to extend useful operating range of compressors.
4
Motivation and Objectives
Compressor instabilities can cause fatigue and damage to entire engine
5
Rotating Stall Rotating stall is a 2-D unsteady local phenomenon
Types of rotating stall: Part-span Full-span 2 2 2 1 1 1 Blade 1 sees a high a. Blade 1 recovers. Blase 2 stalls. Blade 1 stalls.
6
Surge Mild Surge Deep Surge Mean Operating Point Pressure Rise
Flow Rate Mean Operating Point Pressure Rise Flow Rate Peak Performance Limit Cycle Oscillations Time Flow Rate Period of Mild Surge Cycle Time Flow Rate Period of Deep Surge Cycle Flow Reversal
7
How to Control Instabilities
Bleed Valves Diffuser bleed valves Pinsley, Greitzer, Epstein (MIT) Prasad, Neumeier, Haddad (GT) Movable plenum walls Gysling, Greitzer, Epstein (MIT) Guide vanes Dussourd (Ingersoll-Rand Research Inc.) Air-injection Murray (CalTech) Fleeter, Lawless (Purdue) Weigl, Paduano, Bright (MIT & NASA Lewis) Movable Plenum Walls Guide Vanes Air-Injection
8
GTTURBO3D Flow Solver Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations in finite volume representation. A Four Point Stencil is used to compute the inviscid flux terms at the cell faces according to Roe’s formulation (Third-order accurate in space, first- or second-order accurate in time) The viscous fluxes are computed to second order spatial accuracy. Turbulence is modeled by one-equation Spalart-Allmaras model Code can handle multiple computational blocks and inlet distortions
9
Boundary Conditions (GTTURBO3D)
Outflow boundary (coupling with plenum) Periodic Boundary at compressor inlet Solid Wall Boundary at compressor casing Periodic Boundary at diffuser at impeller blades at clearance gap at compressor hub Inflow Zonal Boundary
10
Outflow BC (GTTURBO3D) Conservation of mass: CFD Outflow Boundary
Plenum Chamber u(x,y,z) = 0 pp(x,y,z) = const. isentropic ap, Vp mc . mt CFD Outflow Boundary Conservation of mass:
11
DLR High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor
40cm Designed and tested by DLR (Germany) High pressure ratio AGARD test case
12
DLR High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor
24 main blades 30 backsweep CFD-grid 141 x 49 x 33 (230,000 grid-points) Design Conditions: 22,360 RPM Mass flow = 4.0 kg/s Total pressure ratio = 4.7 Adiab. efficiency = 83% Exit tip speed = 468 m/s Inlet Mrel = 0.92
13
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Design Conditions) Static Pressure Along Shroud
Excellent agreement between CFD and experiment
14
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Off-Design Conditions) Performance Characteristic Map
Unsteady fluctuations are denoted by size of circles Design Fluctuations at 3.1 kg/sec are 30 times larger than at 4.6 kg/sec Surge Choke
15
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Surge Conditions)
wt/2p, Mild surge cycles develop Surge amplitude grows to 60% of mean flow rate Surge frequency = 94 Hz (1/100 of blade passing frequency)
16
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection-Setup)
0.04RInlet Casing 5° Rotation Axis Impeller RInlet Injection angle, = 5º 3 to 6% injected mass flow rate
17
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection) Different yaw angles, 3% injected mass flow rate
Yaw angle directly affects the unsteady leading edge vortex shedding
18
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection) Different yaw angles, 3% injected mass flow rate
Optimum: Surge amplitude/main flow = 8 % Injected flow/main flow = 3.2 % Yaw angle = 7.5 degrees
19
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection) Yaw angle vs
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection) Yaw angle vs. angle of attack, 3% injected mass flow rate Injection yaw angle directly affects leading edge angle of attack => maximum control for designer
20
DLR-High-Speed-Results (Air-Injection) Angle of attack is directly altered by injection
Optimum injection yaw angle of 7.5 degrees yields best result
21
Axial Compressor (NASA Rotor 67)
22 Full Blades Inlet Tip Diameter m Exit Tip Diameter m Tip Clearance mm Design Conditions: Mass Flow Rate kg/sec Rotational Speed RPM (267.4 Hz) Rotor Tip Speed 429 m/sec Inlet Tip Relative Mach Number 1.38 Total Pressure Ratio 1.63 Adiabatic Efficiency 0.93 Hub 4 Blocks 73X32X21 Total of 196,224 cells
22
Literature Survey of NASA Rotor 67
Computation of the stable part of the design speed operating line: NASA Glenn Research Center (Chima, Wood, Adamczyk, Reid, and Hah) MIT (Greitzer, and Tan) U.S. Army Propulsion Laboratory (Pierzga) Alison Gas Turbine Division (Crook) University of Florence, Italy (Arnone ) Honda R&D Co., Japan (Arima) Effects of tip clearance gap: NASA Glenn Research Center (Chima and Adamczyk) MIT (Greitzer) Shock boundary layer interaction and wake development: NASA Glenn Research Center (Hah and Reid). End-wall and casing treatment: NASA Glenn Research Center (Adamczyk)
23
Relative Mach Contours at Mid-Span (Peak Efficiency)
IV III II I LE TE Spatially uniform flow at design conditions
24
Relative Mach Number at 90% Radius (Peak Efficiency)
30% Pitch 50% Pitch TE LE TE LE
25
Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction (Peak Efficiency)
LE TE Shock Near Suction Side
26
Velocity Profile at Mid-Passage (Peak efficiency)
TE Shock % Mass Flow rate Fluctuations % Pressure Fluctuations Fluctuations are very small (2%) Flow is well aligned. Very small regions of separation observed in the tip clearance gap(Enlarged view)
27
Enlarged View of Velocity Profile in the Clearance Gap (Peak efficiency)
TE Clearance Gap The reversed flow in the gap and the leading edge vorticity grow in size and magnitude as the compressor operates at off-design conditions
28
Performance Map (NASA Rotor 67)
measured mass flow rate at choke: kg/s CFD choke mass flow rate: kg/s C B D Unstable Conditions A Near Stall Controlled Peak Efficiency
29
Location of the Probes for Observing the Pressure and Velocity Fluctuations
The probes are located at 30% chord upstream of the rotor and 90% span They are fixed in space. LE TE I II III IV I II III IV
30
Onset of the Stall (Clean Inlet)
Wt/2p I II III IV I II III IV Probes show identical fluctuations. Flow while unsteady, is still symmetric from blade to blade.
31
Onset of the Stall (Disturbed Inlet)
II III IV Wt/2p Inlet distortion simulated by dropping the stagnation pressure in one block by 20%. Flow is no longer symmetric from blade to blade. Frequency of rotating stall is NW/3.5, where NW : blade passage frequency.
32
Bleed Valve Control Un = mb/(rAb) Pressure, density and tangential
One Tip Chord Pressure, density and tangential velocities are extrapolated from interior. . Un = mb/(rAb) Shroud Hub
33
% Mass Flow Rate Fluctuations
Bleed Valve Control Without Bleed Valve With Bleed Valve % Total Pressure Fluctuations 3% bleed air reduces the total pressure fluctuations by 75% % Mass Flow Rate Fluctuations
34
Bleed Valve Control Axial Velocity Near LE
After 1.5 Rev. % From Hub After 0.5 Rev. Bleed Valve.
35
Conclusions A 3-D numerical flow solver has been developed to investigate compressor instabilities. The flow solver has been applied to obtain a detailed understanding of surge and rotating stall phenomena in axial and centrifugal compressors. Air-injection and bleeding have been numerically analyzed as compressor control schemes. Surge margin extension was achieved for both compression systems. The proper application of air-injection is sensitive to the injection-parameters (e.g. yaw angle).
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.