1. Vorticity in Heavy-Ion Collisions and its manifestations ECT*,Trento QCD in Strong Magnetic fields November 13 2012 Oleg Teryaev JINR

2. Outline Rotating QCD matter: comparing magnetic field and vorticity Chiral Vortical Effect & neutron asymmetries (@ NICA) Vorticity in model calculations Background: Dilepton angular distributions in heavy ion collisions Hyperon polarizations

3. How fast is the rotation in HIC? Magnetic field – highest possible ever = CME Rotation – another pseudovector – angular velocity Also highest possible! - velocities ~ c at the distances ~ Compton length But! No charge conservation constraining electric current and magnetic field Is it observable?!

4. Anomaly in medium – new external lines in VVA graph Gauge field -> velocity CME -> CVE Kharzeev, Zhitnitsky (07) – EM current Straightforward generalization: any (e.g. baryonic) current – neutron asymmeries@NICA - Rogachevsky, Sorin, OT – PRC10’

5. Baryon charge with neutrons – (Generalized) Chiral Vortical Effect Coupling: V 2 =1: Specific (non-linear) gauge Current: - Uniform chemical potentials: - Rapidly (and similarly) changing chemical potentials:

6. What part of VVA is (non- renormalized anomaly?) Massless VVA with real photons –entirely anomaly Experience from virtual photons: anomaly – integral relation for spectral denisty (“Anomaly sum rule”) even in the massless limit Can temperature and/or chemical potentia play the same role as photon virtuality?

7. Anomaly and virtual photons Often assumed that only manifested in real photon amplitudes Not true – appears at any Q 2 Natural way – dispersive approach to anomaly (Dolgov, Zakharov’70) - anomaly sum rules One real and one virtual photon – Horejsi,OT’95 where

8. Anomaly – collective effect (Klopot, Oganesian, OT ‘10)

9. Comparing CME and CVE Orbital Angular Momentum and magnetic moment are proportional – Larmor theorem Vorticity for uniform rotation – proportional to OAM Same scale as magnetic field Tests are required

10. Model calculations (Baznat,Gudima,Sorin,OT)

11. Distribution of vorticity and HELICITY (v curlv)

12. Hydrodynamical Helicity separation

13. Hydrodynamical Helicity separation in a hybrid model (hydro stage) - Steinheimer,Bleicher,Stoecker

14. Qualitative picture of separation yy (same vorticity, mirror velocity) ~ zz

15. Dimensionless scale of helicity

16. Collective effects for rotation- L =[rp] - sensitivity to transverse spatial separation sign

17. Observation of GCVE Sign of topological field fluctuations unknown – need quadratic (in induced current) effects CME – like-sign and opposite-sign correlations – S. Voloshin No antineutrons, but like-sign baryonic charge correlations possible Look for neutron pairs correlations! MPD may be well suited for neutrons!

18. Estimates of statistical accuracy at NICA MPD (months of running) UrQMD model : 2-particles -> 3-particles correlations no necessity to fix the event plane 2 neutrons from mid-rapidity +1 from ZDC

19. Other sources of quadratic effects Quadratic effect of induced currents – not necessary involve (C)P-violation May emerge also as C&P even quantity Complementary probes of two-current correlators desirable Natural probe – dilepton angular distributions

20. Observational effects of current correlators in medium McLerran Toimela’85 Dileptons production rate Structures –similar to DIS F1, F2 (p ->v)

21. Tensor polarization of in-medium vector mesons (Bratkovskaya, Toneev, OT’95) Hadronic in-medium tensor – analogs of spin-averaged structure functions: p -> v Only polar angle dependence Tests for production mechanisms

22. General hadronic tensor and dilepton angular distribution Angular distribution Positivity of the matrix (= hadronic tensor in dilepton rest frame) + cubic – det M> 0 1 st line – Lam&Tung by SF method

23. Magnetic field induced conductivity (Buividovich, Polikarpov et al) and asymmetries zz-component of conductivity (~hadronic) tensor dominates λ =-1 Longitudinal polarization with respect to magnetic field axis Extra dileptons fly predominantly in reaction plane No azimuthal asymmetry due to positivity

24. Other signals of rotation Hyperons (in particular, Λ) polarization (self-analyzing in weak decay) HIC – smearing of production plane asymmetry -> reaction plane (M. Jacob) Searched at RHIC (S. Voloshin et al.) – oriented plane (slow neutrons) - no signal observed No tensor polarizations as well

25. Why rotation is not seen? Possible origin – distributed orbital angular momentum and local spin-orbit coupling Only small amount of collective OAM is coupled to polarization The same should affect lepton polarization Global (pions) momenta correlations (handedness)

26. New sources of Λ polarization coupling to rotation Bilinear effect of vorticity – generates quark axial current (Son, Surowka) Strange quarks - should lead to Λ polarization Proportional to strange chemical potential squared – small at RHIC – may be probed at FAIR & NICA

27. Another description of spin-rotation coupling – gravitomagnetic effects Rotation +Equivalence Principle = gravitomagnetic field Coupled to Gravitational Formfactors Analogous to EM ones – related to Generalized Parton Distributions and angular momenta of quarks and gluons Dirac equation in (strong) gravitational fields – Obukhov, Silenko, OT 05-10’ HIC applications in progress

28. Induced current for (heavy - with respect to magnetic field strength) strange quarks Effective Lagrangian Current and charge density from c (~7/45) – term (multiscale medium!) Light quarks -> matching with D. Kharzeev et al’ -> correlation of density of electric charge with a gradient of topological one (Lattice ?)

29. Properties of perturbative charge separation Current carriers are obvious - strange quarks -> matching -> light quarks? NO obvious relation to chirality – contribution to axial current starts from pentagon (!) diagram No relation to topology (also pure QED effect exists) Effect for strange quarks is of the same order as for the light ones if topological charge is localized on the distances ~ 1/m s, strongly (4 th power!) depends on the numerical factor : Ratio of strange/light – sensitive probe of correlation length Universality of strange and charm quarks separation - charm separation suppressed as (m s /m c ) 4 ~ 0.0001 Charm production is also suppressed – relative effects may be comparable at moderate energies (NICA?) – but low statistics

30. Comparing CME to strangeness polarization Strangeness polarization – correlation of (singlet) quark current (chromo)magnetic field (nucleon) helicity Chiral Magnetic Effect - correlation of (electromagnetic) quark current (electro)magnetic field (Chirality flipping) Topological charge gradient

31. Local symmetry violation CME – assumed to be the sign of local P(C) violation BUT Matrix elements of topological charge, its density and gradient are zero Signs of real C(P) violation – forbidden processes

32. Forbidden decays in vacuum – allowed in medium C-violation by chemical potential -> (Weldon ’92) (OT’96; Radzhabov, Volkov, Yudichev ’05,06 - NJL) New (?) option: in magnetic field Polarization (angular distribution in c.m. frame ) of dilepton (with respect to field direction!)

33. Approximation: EM part – vacuum value Two-stage forbidden decays - I

34. Two-stage forbidden decays - II

35. Relating forbidden and allowed decays In the case of complete mass degeneracy:

36. Conclusions Chiral Vortical Effect may be probed in the neutron asymmetries (at NICA?) Model calculation manifest hydrodynamical helicity separation effect Collective in-plane correlation as a probe of rotation Bilinear current correlator may be probed in dilepton asymmetries Vorticity – new source of hyperon polarization