Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWesley Hardy Modified over 9 years ago
1
13 – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Forecasting 13
2
13 – 2 Demand Patterns HorizontalTrend SeasonalCyclical
3
13 – 3 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Linear Regression Dependent variable Independent variable X Y Estimate of Y from regression equation Regression equation: Y = a + bX Actual value of Y Value of X used to estimate Y Deviation, or error Figure 13.2 – Linear Regression Line Relative to Actual Data
4
13 – 4 n X 2 - ( X) 2 n XY - X Y b = a = Y-bar – b*X-bar
5
13 – 5 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. |||||| 051015202530 Week 450 – 430 – 410 – 390 – 370 – 350 – Patient arrivals Time Series Methods Figure 13.4 – Weekly Patient Arrivals at a Medical Clinic
6
13 – 6 Comparison of 3- and 6-Week MA Forecasts Week Patient Arrivals Actual patient arrivals 3-week moving average forecast 6-week moving average forecast
7
13 – 7 Comparison of different alpha for Exponential Smoothing Forecasts
8
13 – 8 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. |||||||||||||||| 0123456789101112131415 80 – 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – Patient arrivals Week Actual blood test requests Trend-adjusted forecast Using Trend-Adjusted Exponential Smoothing Figure 13.5 – Trend-Adjusted Forecast for Medanalysis
9
13 – 9 YearQuarterDemandStep 1. CMAStep 2. D/CMA Step 3. Index for each season Step 4. Assume Demand 2011 = 48 2008Spring 6 Summer4 Fall8 Winter6 2009Spring8 Summer6 Fall10 Winter8 2010Spring10 Summer8 Fall12 Winter10
10
13 – 10 Comparison of Seasonal Patterns Multiplicative patternAdditive pattern
11
13 – 11 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. CFE = E t Measures of Forecast Error ( E t – E ) 2 n – 1 = Et2nEt2n MSE = |Et |n|Et |n MAD = ( | E t |/ D t ) (100) n MAPE = E = CFE n
12
13 – 12 % of area of normal probability distribution within control limits of the tracking signal Control Limit SpreadEquivalentPercentage of Area (number of MAD)Number of within Control Limits 57.62 76.98 89.04 95.44 98.36 99.48 99.86 ± 0.80 ± 1.20 ± 1.60 ± 2.00 ± 2.40 ± 2.80 ± 3.20 ± 1.0 ± 1.5 ± 2.0 ± 2.5 ± 3.0 ± 3.5 ± 4.0 Forecast Error Ranges Forecasts stated as a single value can be less useful because they do not indicate the range of likely errors. A better approach can be to provide the manager with a forecasted value and an error range.
13
13 – 13 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Forecasting Principles TABLE 13.2 | SOME PRINCIPLES FOR THE FORECASTING PROCESS Better processes yield better forecasts Demand forecasting is being done in virtually every company, either formally or informally. The challenge is to do it well—better than the competition Better forecasts result in better customer service and lower costs, as well as better relationships with suppliers and customers The forecast can and must make sense based on the big picture, economic outlook, market share, and so on The best way to improve forecast accuracy is to focus on reducing forecast error Bias is the worst kind of forecast error; strive for zero bias Whenever possible, forecast at more aggregate levels. Forecast in detail only where necessary Far more can be gained by people collaborating and communicating well than by using the most advanced forecasting technique or model
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.