Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOswald Heath Modified over 9 years ago
1
Mao Ye, Peifeng Yin, Wang-Chien Lee, Dik-Lun Lee Pennsylvania State Univ. and HKUST SIGIR 11
2
Outline Introduction and Motivation Model Experiments & Evaluation Conclusions
3
Introduction Location Based Social Network(LBSNs): Foursquare, Gowalla, Brightkite, Loopt etc. Allow share tips or experience of Point-of- Interest(POIs) e.g. restaurants, stores, cinema through check-in behaviors
5
Main Elements in LBSNs
6
Motivation Recommend new POIs to users can help them explore new places and know their cities better In LBSNs, different from other systems, “cyber” connections among users as well as “physical” interactions between users and locations captured in the systems, thus POIs recommendation in LBSNs is promising and interesting The idea of incorporating the geographical influence between POIs has not been investigated previously
7
Model Three important factors: Geographical influence User preference of POIs Social Influence A fusion framework combine all three
8
Geographical Influence measures how likely two of a user’s check-in POIs within a given distance User power law distribution to model the check-in probability to the distance between two POIs visited by the same users: Given user i and his check-in history Li, then
9
Geographical Influence Then for a new location l j, we have the probability for user I to check in l j as follows:
10
User-based CF Based on user similarity is the predicted check-in probability. is the similarity of user i and user k, and computed as follows:
11
Friend Based CF Based on recommendation from friends Friends have closer social tie Friends show more similar check-in bahavior
12
Fusion Framework Combine all of the three factors
13
Data Set
14
Performance Metrics Mark off some POIs and the systems return top-N recommended POIs Mainly examine below two metrics The ratio of recovered POIs to N, precision@N The ration of recovered POIs to the total POIs which are marked off, recall@N
15
Experiments Model in this paper denotes as USG U for user preference S for social influence G for geographical influence Compared Methods User-based CF (U) : set α=β=0 Friend-based CF (S): set α = 1, β=0 GI-based (G): set α = 0, β=1 Random Walk with Restart(RWR) User preference/social influence based (US): set β=0 User preference/geographical influence based(UG): set α = 0
16
Tuning Parameters User preference plays a dominate role in contributing to the optimal recommendation Both social and geographical influence are innegligible
17
Performance Comparison Result USG always the best RWR may not be suitable for POI recommendation Social influence and geographical influence can be utilized to perform POI recommendation
18
Study on Item-based CF Regard POIs as “items” and denotes as L, and combine it with user preference(U) and geographical influence(G) L brings no advantage at all in enhancing U or L in POI recommendation POIs in LBSNs not have been visited by sufficient users
19
Study on Social Influence User check-in behaviors and the user similarity calculated based on RWR Check-in behaviors and social tie strength The similarity in friends’ check-in behaviors not necessarily be reflected through social tie strength
20
Impact of Data Sparsity The larger the mark-off ratio x is, the sparser the user- Check-in matrix is Geographical plays an extremely important role when data is very sparse.
21
Test for Cold Start Users Consider users who have less than 5 check-ins after mark off 30% For cold start users, user preference is hard to capture, thus U performs bad, and as few check-ins, G also affects, and S is more useful in this situation
22
Conclusions First incorporate geographical influence into POI recommendation Incorporate U,S,G into a fusion framework Experiments conclusions Geographical influence shows a more significant impact than social influence RWR may be not suitable for POI recommendation, friends’ taste is different( friends have low common check-in ratio) Item-based CF is not effective
23
Future Work Combine semantic tags, e.g. location categories such as Store, Restaurants Combine geographical influence into Matrix Factorization Method Take location transition sequence into consideration
24
Thanks Q&A
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.