1. Economics of Postmodernity …is Economics for Suicides, Emo’s and Sadists Andrew E. MoMuD

2. TOLERATION infinite needs, scarce resources no direct violence (indirect violence is OK) “Optimal” rather than “fair” Economics vs. conflict

3. Violence assume Violence = Injustice –Justice means a subjective yet conscious notion of equilibrium. –to recognize violence, a victim must envision justice

4. Поскольку вошло в моду высмеивать Смита и его современников за их якобы ошибочную психологию, я готов, пожалуй, рискнуть и высказать мнение, что для любых практических задач мы все еще можем больше узнать о поведении человека из "Богатства народов", чем из большинства претенциозных современных трактатов по "социальной психологии". («Индивидуализм», курс лекций) An “orthodox” economist Friedrich von Hayek

5. Economic Men @ General Equilibrium -Pareto criterion for Justice -What does it have to do with [indirect] violence? Indirect violence vs. legal entities: Money- Laundering laws + Tax legislations on transfer pricing: “show me your economic purpose” Indirect violence vs. individuals: segregation+Responsibility

6. Responsibility You are somehow different from the Normal Man => you either fight for your basic needs or spend extra on them. You want something extraordinary => you have ill Motivation. Go consult a psychoanalyst. You caused trouble => you wanted trouble Civilization has a price, and in the absence of God, the Society is always ready to write out the bills.

7. Orthodox economist’s “handwriting” in Ecological Discourse Internalization; markets rule Someone should own the rights for clean air and soil. No matter who. Today’s issues alone matter. Ronald Coase, “the Problem of Social Costs”, 1959

8. Responsibility to the Environment …vs. Responsibility to the Industries?!

9. Marx sees more violence there is always misunderstanding on value of goods in stock. Equilibrium on labour market does not make wages fair Behind money circulation there is a reality of (class) interests and self- consciousness

10. Polanji is surprised there are so many rights Land, labour and clean environment have not been produced for sale => economic resources and “3 rd Party claims” should not belong to anyone! Market Economy institutions haven’t proved to be most efficient, but rather most violent

11. Dealing with uncertainty “The sense in which I am using the term [uncertainty] is that in which the prospect of a European war is uncertain, or the price of copper and the rate of interest twenty years hence, or the obsolescence of a new invention, or the position of private wealth owners in the social system in 1970. About these matters there is no scientific basis on which to form any calculable probability whatever. We simply do not know” (Keynes, 1937: 113).

12. Money and the mimetic hypothesis Man needs Society to introduce money – of mere egoism. If it doesn’t, or if it introduces money that can’t compete, individuals will try to speculate on rarity, and all markets will be in crisis. No one knows what he/she wants “strategically” unless King declares: “this is money, you all must like it,want it and pay it to me” Money causes wars, famine and rebellion. <-Prof. M.Aglietta Prof. A.Orlean->

13. The “Novelistic Man” People should be considered even more mutually suspicious than Homo Economicus. Real men seen as too bad for liberalism, too mean for individualism, too greedy for uncertainty settlement. Most living men, however, are not that “normal” as to engage in endless fight for both items and definitions…

14. Growing particularistic: There already exists Economics for Paupers Giffen studies “Mein Kampf” Bangladeshi experience

15. No math beyond these lines! Personality challenged assumption Economic Agents Some of Economics is rather Karl Marx Price->Value as D/S balanceexploitor/exploitedPolitics the "social psychologists" individualismliving cellSociology John M. Keynes probabilistic nature of Uncertaintybeast Practical Psychology (Crisis management) Karl Polanji availability of the limited resourcesthiefGeopolitics Aglietta&Orlean egoistic preferences self-sufficiencythe Novelistic ManDiplomacy Us infinite material wantsEccentrics Theology and Metaphysics

16. Eccentrics: the EMOboy Features: Totally “subjective”, he gets what he wants and wants what he gets, including everyone around hating him Makes us relax assumptions of: objective reason in preferences Quote on EMO effect: человек делает не то, что ему выгодно, а то, что ему приятно. (Достоевский)

17. Eccentrics: the Suicide Features:Tries to quit the fight; his past decisions affect not only his present opportunities, but also his decision- making rule – in a self-destructive way… Makes us relax assumptions of: utility-maximizing behavior Quote on Suicide effect: Ненависть всегда обращена к прошлому и зависит от прошлого. Человек, охваченный аффектом ненависти, не может быть обращён к будущему, к новой жизни. (Бердяев)

18. Eccentrics: the Sadist Features: Cruelty is not a “drug” Violence boosts his impetus for life and (probably) consumption Makes up relax assumptions of: internalization possibility (cultural constraints) Quote on Sadist effect: он вредит не "только себе", но всем: колодцы человеческих душ имеют как бы подземное (бессознательное) сообщение, и тот, кто засоряет и отравляет свой колодец, тот засоряет и отравляет все чужие. Человек, не соблюдающий духовную гигиену, есть очаг всеобщего, общественного заражения. (Ильин)

19. A postmodern ecologic issue Problem: Factory polluting the environment yet giving work to inhabitants of the nearby town, producing high-quality output, also a major source of tax income to the town’s budget. Pigouvean approach: levy a tax on pollution, despite that could make Factory shut down… Coasian approach: compare advantages and disadvantages of Factory closure; grant the right for clean air and soil to either Citizens or even the Factory

20. Now what if… Social Activists behave like EMOs Mayor of the Town is as honest and/or consistent as a Suicide Agents of a competitor factory play (though legally) for Sadists

21. Why do I think that Economics of Meanings is scientific? It is pessimistic enough. None of the given Eccentric types is supposedly altruistic It does not deny the graphs and Individualism; rather, it constrains. The Internet and other postindustrial facilities have broadened the eccentrics’ field and opportunities of economic and social activity.