Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

QFD Requirements prioritization

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "QFD Requirements prioritization"— Presentation transcript:

1 QFD Requirements prioritization
J.Jayaraman Center for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering) Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of technology, Bombay DIAT POINTS COURSE

2 JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Benefits of QFD Comparison of design changes with and without QFD months Design changes Jap Co used QFD US Co Did not use QFD Toyota production start up problems before and after QFD After QFD Before QFD Product complaints months JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

3 JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE 02-06-2008
Benefits of QFD Pre QFD startup Pre production After QFD startup Pre production 39% of pre QFD cost Loss Preparation training etc. Start up and Pre-production costs at Toyota before and after QFD JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

4 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
QFD is a concept developed by Yaji Akao Developed at Kobe shipyard of Mitsubishi Shipyard early 1980s. Xerox and Ford have used it Typically applied to small systems. Being tried for large systems (NASA Lunar Rover) It was developed to build design quality into a product JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

5 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
It facilitates translation of a prioritized set of subjective customer requirements into a set of system level requirements during system conceptual stage It addresses customer requirements, design requirements, functions, parts, and failure modes JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

6 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Definition “ An organized, disciplined process for determining the product or service requirements necessary to achieve customer-perceived expressed or unexpressed quality” (Otten and Groeneveld 2002) JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

7 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
QFD permits analysis and determination of priority issues QFD is a planning process Out puts are the key action issues for improved customer satisfaction JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

8 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Hows vs. hows Benchmarking competition Customer weights Relative importance Design requirements Hows whys Customer Requirements whats Relationship Matrix Whats vs. hows Whats vs. whys How much How much vs. How much Prioritized requirements Competitive benchmarks Design targets JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

9 QFD provides integration through the life cycle phases of the system
Customer voice analysis Customer Requirements System Design Requirements Sub-system Requirements Part requirements Process requirements Customer importance Product design and development Manufacturing process design and development JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

10 Requirements prioritization
Improvement ratio: It is the ratio of desired performance to existing performance Sales point: It is the weight given to a requirement if it will improve the marketability of the product JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

11 Requirements prioritization
Customer weights: The importance customer gives to each of his requirements. It defines his priorities. Customer satisfaction: It is the rating of the existing product technical characteristics based on the customer requirements Planned satisfaction: It is the rating of the new product technical characteristics planned based on customer requirements JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

12 Determining Target values Design Requirements
Identify customer Requirements (CR) and weight Identify design requirements (DR) corresponding to CR Identify relationship between DR and CR Bench mark competitive products on CR Determine improvement ratio and revised weights of CR Calculate weight of DRs Choose best value of competing DR performance JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE

13 Video projector Customer requirements and weights
CR No. Customer requirements Customer weights 1 Excellent image quality 3 2 Clear sound Easy to use 9 4 portable 5 stylish 6 reliable 7 quiet 8 compatible affordable 10 Bright image Customer weights scale 1-9

14 Video projector benchmarking competitors
IPR- Improvement ratio Customer requirements Customer weights Us Product A Plan IPR Sales point Raw score Revised customer weights Excellent image quality 3 5 7 1.4 1.2 5.0 6.0 Clear sound 1 4 1.0 Easy to use 9 6 1.3 11.7 14.0 portable 8 stylish reliable 16.8 quiet 3.0 3.6 compatible 10.8 12.9 affordable 1.1 9.9 11.9 Bright image 15.1 18.3 Raw score= customer weight*IPR*sales point Revised Customer wt. = Raw score/ Raw score

15 Video projector design requirements with their units
Sl No. Units Image brightness 1 lumens Contrast ratio 2 a:1 Image resolution 3 X*Y pixels weight 4 kg Set up time 5 seconds Audio quality 6 N-M Hz. Audio volume 7 Watts Physical volume 8 mm*mm*mm Surface temperature 9 Degree C Operating noise 10 dB MTBF 11 Hours`

16 Video projector Relationship matrix CRs vs. DRs
CR No. Revised Cust. wts. Design requirements 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 6.0 9 9 9 3 1 2 1.4 1 9 3 1 3 3 14.0 3 9 1 3 1 4 14.0 9 1 1 1 9 1 5 1.2 1 1 1 3 1 6 16.8 1 1 3 1 3 9 7 3.6 1 1 1 1 9 8 12.9 9 9 11.9 3 1 1 3 1 3 10 18.3 9 3 3 3 3 9 3 3 Raw score 236 109 109 282 307 31 35 274 165 105 232 Rel.wt. % Priority 4 2 1 3

17 Video projector Target requirements
Surface temperature requirements Design Set up time Audio quality Audio volume Physical volume Image brightness Contrast ratio Image resolution Operating noise Weight MTBF Our product 500 350:1 600* 450 4.2. 30 50 to 6000 0.8 305* 230* 100 50 45 50K 40K 40 60 350* 250* 100 1 50 to 6000 35 4.5 800* 600 400:1 700 Product A 50K 40 50 305* 230* 100 1 To 6000 30 4 800* 600 400:1 700 Target s

18 Quality Function Deployment (QFD)
Solve water dispenser problem in place of the video projector JJ DIAT POINTS COURSE


Download ppt "QFD Requirements prioritization"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google