Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySandra Hubbard Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Impact of Nearby Structures and Trees on Sigma Theta Measurements Tom Bellinger Illinois Dept of Nuclear Safety 1035 Outer Park Drive Springfield IL 62704 bellinger@idns.state.il.us
2
Why did I do this study? Determine if nearby trees were impacting the lower level wind data particularly at Zion Visualize the extent of any tower shadow on the wind direction sensor Visualize the extent of crossarm sensor shadow on the wind direction sensor
3
CROSSARM SENSOR SHADOW TOWER SHADOW WD WS
4
Obtaining Average Sigma Thetas Zion (7/1990-12/2001) Dresden, Braidwood, LaSalle (12/1998-12/2001) 15 minute averages were used Averaged by tower level Averaged by 36 meteorological sectors (Winds from 0°-10°, 10°-20°, etc.) Sigma thetas with wind speeds less than 2.2 m/s (~5mph) were omitted
5
Illinois Nuclear Plant Locations Zion Braidwood Dresden LaSalle Chicago Lake Michigan
6
ZION MET TOWER
7
ZION
8
ZIONTREES
10
FROM ZION MET TOWER LOOKING SOUTH-SOUTHEAST
11
FROM ZION MET TOWER LOOKING SOUTH
12
LOOKING NORTH-NORTHEAST TO ZION MET TOWER
13
LOOKING NORTH TO ZION MET TOWER
14
ZION146° 168° CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 305° TOWERSHADOW FROM 10-30°
15
TREES PLANTCATS
16
ZIONTREES Inaccurate plume spread due to trees Morelikelyplumespread
17
MET TOWER 187 FEET HIGH 120 FEET HIGH ZION
18
ZION 10.7 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS ~2000ft FROM PLANT
19
FROM LAKEFROM LAND TSPLANTCA
21
WIND SPEEDS +3.6 M/S
24
ZION More likely plume spread due to building wake effects Plume spread without building wake effects
25
ZION Actual plume with building wake effect Model may add more building wake effect
26
ZION Plume spread for offshore winds More likely plume spread for offshore winds More likely plume spread for onshore winds Plume spread for onshore winds
27
Sigma Thetas Results for Zion Impact of trees on 10-meter level data Impact of containment and plant buildings on 76-meter and 38-meter level data Land/Lake differences
28
DRESDEN
29
DRESDEN MET TOWER
30
DRESDEN TREES TREES
31
TransmissionTowers DRESDEN
32
LOOKING EAST-NORTHEAST TO DRESDEN PLANT
33
LOOKING NORTHEAST TO DRESDEN SWITCHYARD
34
LOOKING NORTH FROM DRESDEN MET TOWER
35
LOOKING WEST FROM DRESDEN MET TOWER
36
LOOKING SOUTH-SOUTHEAST FROM DRESDEN MET TOWER
37
DRESDEN 90° 75° CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 335° TOWERSHADOW FROM 40-60°
38
141 FEET HIGH 105 FEET HIGH DRESDEN
39
19.1 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS ~2700-3300ft FROM PLANT DRESDEN
40
PLANTTSCA ??
41
DRESDEN
43
FOR +3.6M/S
44
300º-310º 240º-250º ~3 MILES ~5 MILES DRESDEN
45
FROM DRESDEN MET TOWER LOOKING SOUTHWEST
47
LOOKING SOUTHEAST TO DRESDEN
49
Sigma Thetas Results for Dresden Impact of containment and plant buildings at all levels (10, 61, and 91 meters) Impact of nearby trees, tower shadow, and/or transmission towers? Illinois River Topographic effect on 10 meter data? Impact of distant industrial areas?
50
BRAIDWOOD MET TOWER
51
BRAIDWOOD
52
BRAIDWOOD TREES TREES
54
LOOKING SOUTHWEST TO BRAIDWOOD PLANT
55
LOOKING NORTHEAST TO BRAIDWOOD MET TOWER
56
LOOKING EAST TO BRAIDWOOD MET TOWER
57
LOOKING SOUTHEAST TO BRAIDWOOD MET TOWER
58
LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM BRAIDWOOD MET TOWER
59
BRAIDWOOD CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 330° TOWERSHADOW FROM 50-75° 240° 218°
60
133 FEET HIGH 198 FEET HIGH BRAIDWOOD
61
BRAIDWOOD 12.1 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS ~2400ft FROM PLANT
63
FOR +3.6M/S
64
Sigma Thetas for Braidwood Impact of containment and plant buildings at both levels (62 and 10 meters) Impact of trees on 10-meter level data
65
LA SALLE MET TOWER
66
LA SALLE MET TOWER
67
LA SALLE MET TOWER
68
LA SALLE
69
LOOKING NORTH-NORTHWEST FROM LASALLE MET TOWER
71
CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 335° TOWERSHADOW FROM 35-60° 320°335° LA SALLE
72
OLD MET TOWER
73
184 FEET HIGH 133 FEET HIGH LA SALLE
74
10.6 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS ~1950ft FROM PLANT
77
FOR +3.6M/S
78
Plume spread prior to crossing the Illinois River valley Plume spread after crossing the Illinois River valley LA SALLE
79
Sigma Thetas for LaSalle Impact of containment and plant buildings at all levels (10, 61 and 114 meters) Illinois River topographic effect at all levels
80
Study Impacts Met tower siting criteria Site evaluations and maintenance Building wake effects Stability classification for modeling Topographic effects Atmospheric transport Emergency response
85
Preliminary Results from Byron and Quad Cities Sites January - April, 2002
86
Braidwood Illinois Nuclear Plant Locations Zion LaSalle Dresden Byron Quad Cities
87
BYRON
88
BYRON
89
BYRON MET TOWER
90
LOOKING NORTHEAST TO BYRON MET TOWER
91
LOOKING NORTHEAST
92
LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM THE BYRON MET TOWER
93
LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM THE BYRON MET TOWER
94
BYRON46° 72° TOWERSHADOW FROM 65-85° CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 0°
95
BYRON 200 FEET HIGH 138 FEET HIGH
96
BYRON
97
BYRON 500 FEET HIGH
98
~3700ft FROM PLANT 18.5 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS BYRON ~4400ft FROM COOLING TOWERS 7.4 COOLING TOWER HEIGHTS
99
PLANT
100
QUAD CITIES
102
MET TOWER
103
QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
104
QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
105
QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
106
TREES QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
107
QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
108
LOOKING SOUTH AT THE QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
109
LOOKING SOUTHWEST AT THE QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
110
LOOKING SOUTH-SOUTHEAST AT THE QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
111
LOOKING NORTHWEST AT THE QUAD CITIES MET TOWER
112
1/4 MILE SOUTHWEST OF THE QUAD CITIES MET TOWER - LOOKING NORTHWEST
113
QUAD CITIES CROSSARMSHADOW FROM 0° TOWERSHADOW FROM 65-85° 350°340°
114
QUAD CITIES 143 FEET HIGH 106 FEET HIGH
115
QUAD CITIES
117
~4800ft FROM PLANT 33.6 CONTAINMENT HEIGHTS
118
PLANT TREES
120
Quad Cities 10-meter Wind Sensors on April 18, 2002 around 1pm
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.