1. UNCLASSIFIED March 10, 2011 Rapid Acquisition OSD CAPE Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation

2. UNCLASSIFIED How to not make the SD the PM for rapid acquisition items Purpose 2 Current process requires senior leader involvement How to balance urgent needs against the risk the system is willing to take How fast is it required, how much is the department willing to pay, and how much oversight is required

3. UNCLASSIFIED Current Acquisition Model Senior Leader Involvement Total Program Costs Complexity & Risk Theater Local Cmd SAE MDA BTR Theater Funding ATR OCO POM COTS/GOTS PO Integration DaysWeeksMonthsQuartersYearYears DSD SD S&T at Government Labs Using Existing Auths and Contracts 5000 CAT I Easy with No Risk Difficult with Risk Need to Delivery Time ProgrammingRe-ProgrammingYear of Execution To shorten time requires more sr ldr involvement MRAP SDB/C-130 Laser JDAM SM-6 MC-12 Liberty GH JIEDDO

4. UNCLASSIFIED Rapid Acquisition Requirements Process 4 IdentifyValidatePrioritize Capability Requirement ValidationPick a Solution DevelopDemonstrate ProcureDemonstrate Procure OR Sustain & Transfer Sustain & Transition OR Then Integrate to a Service or Agency

5. UNCLASSIFIED How Can a Program Get an EZ-Pass? 5 High priority JUON that must be tracked Requires funding Initial (break another program, colorless?) O&S costs must be signed up for Requires Service support or buy-in Requires breaking thru the risk adverse nature of the system it is being procured from Government must take on a large integration role Established relationships with contractors Team in place

6. UNCLASSIFIED Rapid Acquisition Future Developments 6 Standing up a DoD-wide program office Current organizations are commodity specific Ad-hoc from current program offices Streamlining how the requirements come in JCIDS is not nimble enough How to create a more open process Appropriating colorless multi-year funding Keeping Congress informed Transition/transfer to services or agencies

7. UNCLASSIFIED Laser JDAM 7 CSAF directed QRC--Weapons to GWOT in 15 month Requirements: CSAF go-ahead Mar 07; Requirements signed Apr 07 Requirements did not change even with addition of Navy Technology: Boeing initial investment, development and demonstration Funding: Initial R&D funding ($6M) from Warfighter Rapid Acquisition Program in 1 month Initial production funds ($20M) reprogrammed in 2 months Follow-on funding kept pace with need $6M R&D in 4 months; Navy funding in 8 months Team: Existing JDAM program office used for LJDAM Supported tailored processes Enablers Rapid receipt of initial funding Agile support from testers Accelerated decision process Sep 2006 CENTAF Urgent Need for Engaging Fast Moving Targets

8. UNCLASSIFIED Precision Lethality MK-82 8 2009 JUON for Very Low Collateral Damage Weapon Requirements: RAC directed QRC for USCENTCOM Direction from JRAC Mar 10, R&D started May 10. Requirements finalized Aug 10, 4 months into effort. Penetration and forward fuzing not critical to low collateral damage. Added 4 months to development effort. Technology: Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, JDAM Funding: Unconventional funding sources SPR leads to reprogramming of $11M SAF/AQ funds for tech maturation through an AFRL ongoing effort $29.5M RDT&E OCO money provided Aug 10 $20M RDT&E & $31M production provided by JRAC Oct 10 Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC New AAC program office stood up. Fulfills Sys Integrator role Organic system level design and system logistics support Enablers Early Funding – Available for effort People – Committed to Warfighter Flexibility Rapid decision making ability Adapt to change daily Agile support from testers

9. UNCLASSIFIED Back Up Slides 9

10. UNCLASSIFIED 10 JCTD Breakfast Club 450 FLMs FY06 FY07 FY08 MS C 1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Qtr Technology Transition AFRL Technology Development Program (25 Arena, Sled & Howitzer Tests) JCTD Integration/Test Program Live Flight Test Static Live Fire Tests Weaponeer Workshops 3 Phase Military Utility Assessment 1 Qtr Contract Award Guided Test Vehicle Flights FLM’s DD-250’d Original Fielding Schedule (50) 50 Residuals Sustainment Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)

11. UNCLASSIFIED 15 Month Timeline Laser JDAM 11

12. UNCLASSIFIED BLU-129/B QRC Schedule 12

13. UNCLASSIFIED Focused Lethality Munition (FLM) 13 2006 Urgent Need for Low Collateral Damage Weapon SECAF directed JCTD--Weapons to GWOT in 18 mos Requirements: Well defined from JCTD process Limited blast zone and focused lethality Requirements were fluid. Penetration requirement reduced Technology: Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, SDB Funding: Out of cycle JCTD SAF/AQ found $10M. Initial $6M went directly to AFRL, $3.6M managed by AAC for AFRL. Follow on funding from misc sources including $10M BTR from SDB I and SDB II. Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC SDB program office supplemented for FLM effort Partnered w/National Labs for composite design expertise Enablers Accelerated Funding People & Teamwork Leadership Vision, Strategy, Focus Accepting failure and taking risk Mature Technologies Clear and Valid Requirement Agile support from testers