Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKerrie Allison Modified over 9 years ago
1
Convective indexes calculated from HIRLAM output St.Petersburg The Russian State Hydrometeorological University Faculty of Meteorology Meteorological Forecasting Department Kanukhina Anna
2
Aims: to estimate possible use of convective indexes calculated on HIRLAM outputs for forecasting of place, beginning time and type of mesoscale convective phenomena
3
Initial data are HIRLAM analysis and forecast files : - air temperature at surface and heights at various periods; - dew point temperature at surface and heights at various periods; - wind parameters at surface and heights at various periods; - surface pressure tendencies; - specific humidity at surface and heights at various periods;
4
3 types of indexes: diagnostic - atmospheric preparedness for convection development (Г, С, MOCON); index having triggering function ( ); indexes estimating possible type of arising phenomena (CAPE,HEI);
5
atmosphere statical stability index Г Ге = Г =
6
moisture convergence MOCON= r – specific humidity, kg/kg ; V – wind speed at 10 m, m/s ;
7
generalized index indicating possibility of convective disturbance formation С Г =
8
convective instability indicator (Falkovich’s index) χ =
9
EHI energy helicity index EHI =CAPE*H Н – relative wind helicity; CAPE convective available potential energy: CAP =
10
Studied cases divided into 3 groups 1 group: days with thunderstorms and showers; indexes indicate high possibility of these weather phenomena; 2 group: days without any convective phenomena but indexes shows existing possibility of phenomena arising( atmospheric instability); 3 group: days associated with thunderstorms and showers; atmosphere is stable according to indexes consideration;
11
Used data HIRLAM forecast; HIRLAM analysis; sounding data; surface observations (synoptic charts OSCAR, registered thunderstorm charts from FMI site http://www.ava.fmi.fi/~tjt/salark.html).
12
Studied cases 29.06.2000 19.06.2001 21-23.11.2001 03-06.07.2002 16-20.07.2003
13
23.11.2001 12UTC
14
Indexes profiles for Kardla, Estonia
15
MOCON, 1/s for Kardla (Estonia) on 23.11.2001 12 UTC analyse fc=12 fc=24
16
MOCON and χ scattering graph for 6 h forecast (on base of analisys on 23.11.2001 06:00 UTC and forecast 23.11.2001 00:00 UTC)
17
С and Γ scattering graph for 6 h forecast (on base of analisys on 23.11.2001 06:00 UTC and forecast 23.11.2001 00:00 UTC)
18
CAPE and HEI scattering graph for 6 h forecast (on base of analisys on 23.11.2001 06:00 UTC and forecast 23.11.2001 00:00 UTC)
19
29.06.2000 12UTC
20
MOCON, CAPE analysis on 29.06.2000 12 UTC
21
Thunderstorms chat on 29.06.2000 (http://www.ava.fmi.fi/~tjt/salark.html)
24
СAPE and MOCON scattering graph for 24 h forecast (on base of analisys on 29.06.2000 12:00 UTC and forecast 28.06.2000 12:00 )
25
С and Γ scattering graph for 24 h forecast (on base of analisys on 29.06.2000 12:00 UTC and forecast 28.06.2000 12:00 )
26
Indexes’ correlation coefficients (forecast and analysis) Ряд 1 –С Ряд 2 – Γ Ряд 3 – χ Ряд 4 – СAPE Ряд 5 – MOCON Ряд 6 – HEI
27
Conclusions -χ values defined by forecasts have essential distinctions with calculations from analysis and χ can not be used for atmospheric state estimation when forecasting at period more than 6h. -The same could be said for HEI. -CAPE and MOCON may be used forecasting at period no more than 12h. -С and Γ forecasts are close to real situation even at 24h forecast period particularly for C values.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.