Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Histamine Related Concerns for Potential Scombrotoxic Fish Processed with Carbon Monoxide or Filtered Smokes Steve Otwell University of Florida Aquatic.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Histamine Related Concerns for Potential Scombrotoxic Fish Processed with Carbon Monoxide or Filtered Smokes Steve Otwell University of Florida Aquatic."— Presentation transcript:

1 Histamine Related Concerns for Potential Scombrotoxic Fish Processed with Carbon Monoxide or Filtered Smokes Steve Otwell University of Florida Aquatic Food Products Program

2 Which do you find more appealing ?

3 Commercial Opinion is Divided
USE OF CARBON MONOXIDE Advantages Disadvantages  Allows freezing for distant market access Provides safety margin over current practices Strong market demand (USA)  Deception, enhance appearance of inferior product Mask potential food safety problems (histamines) Potential toxicity with consumption Commercial Opinion is Divided

4 Commercial Development - History
traditional Hot Smoking...Cold Smoking 1960’s gas blends with MAP & ROP 1970’s CO patents for meat, poultry and fish 1980’s Patents for ‘Filtered’ Smoke Patent & Petition for ‘Tasteless Smoke’ Patent for 0.4% CO with Red Meats (Canada)

5 William R Kowalski October 26, 1999
“Tasteless Smoke”

6 Commercial Development - Trends
Applications ( Tasteless, Clear, Artificial-TS ):  Passive ‘gas in a bag’  Active ‘pressure differentials’  Euthanasia (cultured fish) Products:  Tuna other fish species  Tilapia other cultured species Locations:  IndoPacific South & Central America and recently USA

7 Sushi Grades vs. Grill Grades

8 HACCP & Sanitation

9 Direct Gas Applications

10 Gas Controls ?

11 Time & Temperature Controls

12 C. botulinum issue if refrigerated vs. frozen
ROP & Vac Packaging C. botulinum issue if refrigerated vs. frozen

13 Labeling Mandated vs. Enforced ?

14 Regulatory Status - USA
CO is not approved as a food additive CO is not approved as a color additive CO can not be used to a make product look better than it is … YET… …while FDA did not grant GRAS status for use of ‘tasteless smoke, they did not object to a petition for use with tuna …?

15 Regulatory Status - USA
FDA’s response issued caution with the use of CO and specified necessary labeling… Tuna, Tasteless Smoke (as a preservative) Tuna, Carbon Monoxide (as a preservative) Similar position on red meat petition…?

16 Regulatory Status - USA
NMFS - voluntary inspection services (fee)  List NMFS Approved Operations - basic sanitation - HACCP program - color standards (fading) ?

17 Regulatory Status - Other Nations
USA primary market Japan banned if CO concentration greater than 500 ug/kg (?) Canada - not ‘currently’ approved since requested in 1999 EU Committee objections in 2001, yet limited utilization in meats (Norway)

18 Commercial Development - Trends
CURRENT SITUATIONS:  Less experienced participants  Competition - Patent infringement & Royalties - Fresh vs. Frozen Producers “Refreshed” Products  Negative Publicity Anticipated  Public Reactions ?

19 Negative Publicity Tuna's Red Glare?
It Could Be Carbon Monoxide Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times APPETIZING? At Oh! Raku, above, tuna, boldly red, has been treated with gas. By JULIA MOSKIN (Oct. 2004)

20 Often competitors with refrigerated products
Negative Publicity Often competitors with refrigerated products

21 China treats fish with carbon monoxide !
Negative Publicity China treats fish with carbon monoxide !

22 Congressional Activity
Hearings regarding CO use with red meats Congressman Dingill’s – ‘Food and Drug Import Safety Act” calling for ‘alternative labeling requirements’ for CO exposed meat, poultry and seafood … CO Pack

23 Histamine Concern Species specific issue - claiming potential scombrotoxic illnesses due to consumption of certain fish that “looked” good or acceptable although it may have suffered thermal abuse prior to processing or during subsequent handling or storage

24 Histamine Concern Evidence for document illnesses for such ?
Offers safety option for USA’s growing dependence on imports from long-distant sources Can be addressed with better controls per species, frozen storage and labeling

25 Science Science is trailing commercial practice
Controls - initial product condition vs. CO applications - product shelf-life after thaw - user safety in applications Monitoring - detection vs. labeling - shelf-life for quality and product safety time temperature integrators (TTI’s)

26 Questions ?


Download ppt "Histamine Related Concerns for Potential Scombrotoxic Fish Processed with Carbon Monoxide or Filtered Smokes Steve Otwell University of Florida Aquatic."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google