1. Maternity Locality Profiles Presented at SEPHIG – 16 June 2015 By Ash More – Head of Public Health Intelligence & Nicola Higgins – Sr. Public Health Analyst Buckinghamshire Public Health

2. Background BUCKS HEALTHY LEADERS Cross-Partnership – Multi-agency group represented by all partners and stakeholders from – Health & Social Care CHILDREN & MATERNITY JET (Jt. Exec Team) Represented by CCGs, Council - Public health Commissioners. MATERNITY & CHILDREN PROG BOARD Represented by CCGs, Council - Public health Commissioners. MAT T&F GROUP Governance in Buckinghamshire Maternity Locality Profiles Requested by this group Following the Maternity Needs Assessment

3. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL MAP

4. Buckinghamshire Profile DEMOGRAPHY Census population (2011) = 505,300 Resident population (2015) = 519,000 GP Reg population (Jan 2015) = 537,342 CCGs in Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale CCG - Total Practices = 21 (Pop = 205,121) Chiltern CCG - Total Practices = 34 (Pop = 332,221) Maternal and Child Health Issues – IMR = 3.8 in Buckinghamshire vs 4.0 in England – LBW = 2.2% in Buckinghamshire vs 2.8% in England

5. BUCKINGHAMSHIRE DEPRIVATION MAP 8 th Lowest Deprivation in England (IMD, 2010) Some areas fall within 30% most deprived in the country. LE gap between most and least Deprived population ranging from 5 - 8 years for females and males SI = 8 years for men and 5 years for Women.

6. CCG - GP Localities in Bucks

7. Approach – Scope To understand performance and stats at GP Locality level Demography – Population – Ethnicity Outcome and Risk factors – Births – Nos. Prematurity, LBW – Deliveries - by age, ethnicity, type, booking status – Risk factors – Deprivation, TP, Smoking, ante-natal and post- natal depression – Breast feeding – Immunisations – Mortality – Still births, IMR

8. Methodology

9. Data Sources – ONS LSOA based populations – Census ethnicity – SUS APC maternity data (OPCS4: R17-R25); deliveries by age, ethnicity & mode of delivery – BHT births extract provided for MNA; early booking, SATOD, obesity & prematurity – ONS PHBF; total births, LBWB, stillbirths & infant mortality – NHS England immunisations data LSOA to locality lookup used for population, census, BHT and ONS PHBF data GP to locality lookup used for imms, BFing and admissions data

10. Methodology Spine chart v1 – Quartiles using 7 localities – RAG rated based on being in the ‘worst’ quartile or ‘worst’ value, within the interquartile range or being in the ‘best’ quartile or ‘best’ value

11. Spine Chart v1

12. Methodology Spine chart v2 – Data reanalysed and CIs calculated for all data items – RAG rated based on statistical significance compared to Bucks average

13. Spine Chart v2

14. Outputs & Findings Spine Chart v1 (quartiles)Spine Chart v2 (CIs)

15. Limitations BHT trust data – Data provided for the MNA, and limited to just BHT – Only source of early booking, SATOD, obesity – Although our main provider, made clear at the offset of the limitation of using just BHT data, especially at the South of the County; e.g. SATOD showed 0% for Southern Locality, because only 6% of births occurred at BHT vs. 75% at Wexham Park Used SUS data where possible, but maternity fields in APC not being submitted by Wexham Park Due to small numbers included in calculations at a locality level, all the data that was included in the spine charts was not statistically significantly different to Buckinghamshire average

16. PRODUCT – Page 1 & 2

17. PRODUCT – Page 3 & 4

18. Challenges Managing expectations within limited capacity (Started as a data collation and ended up as profiles). Demanding and ambitious culture. Methodological dilemma: Utilising available intelligence in the best possible way – statistical methodology to present performance that will ensue action. Meaningful outputs to cater to a wide audience including clinicians, commissioners, public health professionals and lay persons.

19. Further Actions Presenting findings to CCG Locality Groups to identify priority areas for intervention over 2015-16 LBW, IMR, Prematurity, Breast feeding, smoking in pregnancy are key areas alongside other priorities GP leads in each CCG for Maternity and Children to use the findings in developing the joint strategy Work will support development of CQUINS with local acute trust DPH is a sponsor for Maternity and Child health through the Health Bucks Leaders Group Findings will also support cross-partnership work with - CYP commissioners, Children’s centres, voluntary agencies etc.

20. Thank You