1. 1 ACUHO-I Construction & Renovation Survey 2006 Report of Findings Jim Day, University of Georgia Ray Thompson, Partner, MGT Cynthia Parish Balogh, Principal, MGT June 25, 2006

2. 2 u History of the Survey – Jim Grimm u ACUHO-I and MGT Collaboration u Project Goals and Objectives äEstablish a national data set that is reliable and useful for institutional planning To provide information that CHOs want and need To create a user-friendly electronic survey To produce an easily accessible report Introduction

3. 3 u Share results from the 2006 survey of 276 colleges and universities u Increase awareness and familiarity with this on-going ACUHO-I project u Facilitate discussion among CHOs concerning construction/renovation issues Purpose of Presentation

4. 4 u Section A: Institutional Characteristics u Section B: Facilities Planning Initiatives u Section C: New Construction Projects u Section D: Renovation Projects u Section E: Survey Feedback Survey Instrument

5. 5 Survey Results

6. 6 u 276 Respondents ~ 38% Response Rate u 97% 4-Year, 3% 2-Year Institutions u 63% Public, 35% Private, <2% Other Responding Institutions

7. 7 Construction or Renovation Completed Winter 2004 through Fall 2005

8. 8 Planning to Initiate Construction or Renovation Project in Next 5 Years

9. 9 Institution Has a Campus Master Plan That Includes Housing

10. 10 Institution Has a Separate Housing Master Plan

11. 11 New Construction Findings 59 Institutions Reporting 65 New Construction Projects

12. 12 Type of Living Units

13. 13 Number of Projects by Percent of Units Configured as Single Occupancy Bedroom u Nearly ½ of new projects were configured with 75% or more single occupancy bedrooms u A little more than 20% of new projects had no single occupancy bedrooms

14. 14 Number of Projects by Percent of Units Configured as Double Occupancy Bedroom u Nearly ¼ of new projects were configured with 75% or more double occupancy bedrooms u More than ½ of new projects had no double occupancy bedrooms

15. 15 Types of Space & Amenities in Facility Top Responses Laundry Staff Office(s) Staff Apartment(s) Lobby Elevator(s) Electronic Security System Central lounge Kitchen(s) 80.1% 72.3% 70.8% 69.2% 63.1%

16. 16 Types of Amenities in Unit Telephone Outlet Internet Access Cable TV Furniture Air Conditioning Individual Temperature Control Carpeting Refrigerator 95.4% 92.3% 89.2% 87.7% 86.2% 78.5% 72.3% Top Responses

17. 17 Project Cost Per GSF By Type of Unit (2006 Survey) Sample Sizes: Adjoining Suites: n = 3, Super Suites: n = 8, Apartments: n = 24

18. 18 Construction Cost Per GSF By Type of Unit (2006 Survey) Sample Sizes: Adjoining Suites: n = 3, Super Suites: n = 6, Apartments: n = 23

19. 19 Comparison of Project Cost Per GSF to 2003-04 Survey

20. 20 Comparison of Construction Cost Per GSF to 2003-04 Survey Comparison of Construction Cost Per GSF to 2003-04 Survey

21. 21 RS Means Median Cost Per GSF Estimates 2000-2006

22. 22 RS Means Costs Per GSF % Change 2000 - 2006

23. 23 Project Cost Per GSF Adjoining Suites Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1, AIMHO: n = 1

24. 24 Construction Cost Per GSF Adjoining Suites Sample sizes:, NEACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1, AIMHO: n = 1

25. 25 Project Cost Per GSF Super Suites Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 2, GLACUHO: n = 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, NWACUHO: n = 2, SEAHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1

26. 26 Construction Cost Per GSF Super Suites Sample sizes: NEACUHO: n = 2, SWACUHO: n = 1, NWACUHO: n = 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 1. The GLACUHO institution reported $15 construction cost/GSF – based on the data from other regions, it has been determined that this region is an outlier and is not used in this chart.

27. 27 Project Cost Per GSF Apartments Sample sizes: NEACUHO = 4, GLACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO = 5, MACUHO = 1, NWACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 8, SWACUHO: n = 2, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1 One additional SEAHO institution reported $1.31 construction cost/GSF – based on the data from other regions, it has been determined that this region is an outlier and is not used in this chart.

28. 28 Construction Cost Per GSF Apartments Sample sizes: NEACUHO = 4, GLACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO = 4, MACUHO = 1, NWACUHO: n= 1, UMR-ACUHO: n = 1, SEAHO: n = 8, SWACUHO: n = 2

29. 29 LEED Certification for Project

30. 30 Reason Facility Was Built  Meet demand for additional beds (83%)  Meet the needs and interests of students (71%)  Increase the variety of housing options (59%) 4Increase percent of undergrads housed (55%) 4Keep pace with enrollment growth (45%) 4Provide higher levels of privacy (45%) 4Replace outdated facilities (34%) Primary Reason:  Meet demand for additional beds (38 % )

31. 31 New Facility Ownership

32. 32 Management of New Facility

33. 33 Management of Foundation-Owned Facility (only)

34. 34 Project Primary Funding Mechanism

35. 35 If Debt Financed, Who Is Responsible For Debt?

36. 36 Renovation Findings 86 Institutions Reporting 193 Renovation Projects 54 Rehabilitation or Modified Rehabilitation Projects

37. 37 Extent of Renovation (all institutions)

38. 38 Type of Living Unit (Rehab/Modified Rehab)

39. 39 Project Cost Per GSF By Region (Rehab/Modified Rehab) Sample sizes: NWACUHO: n = 3, MACUHO: n = 7, UMR-ACUHO: n = 2, WACUHO: n = 5, NEACUHO: n = 8, SEAHO: n = 8, GLACUHO: n = 5, AIMHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1

40. 40 Construction Cost Per GSF By Region (Rehab/Modified Rehab) Sample sizes: NWACUHO: n = 3, MACUHO: n = 7, UMR-ACUHO: n = 2, SEAHO: n = 8, NEACUHO: n = 8, GLACUHO: n = 5, WACUHO: n = 5, AIMHO: n = 1, SWACUHO: n = 1

41. 41 Reason for Renovation (Rehab/Modified Rehab)  Update facilities (93%)  Meet the needs and interests of students (65%)  Other reasons (24%) 4Provide higher levels of privacy (20%) 4Increase the variety of housing options (19%) 4Accommodate academic or special programs (19%) 4Meet the demand for additional beds (17%) Primary Reason:  Update facilities (63%)

42. 42 Method of Project Funding (Rehab/Modified Rehab) No respondents indicated using taxable revenue bonds, a bank loan, donor funds, or a private developer to finance their rehab projects.

43. 43 If Debt Financed, Who is Responsible for Debt ? (Rehab/Modified Rehab)

44. 44 Project Includes Rental Rate Increase (Rehab/Modified Rehab)

45. 45 Discussion & Questions

46. 46 Discussion u Issues for Other Campuses u Barriers to Construction & Renovation u Innovative Ideas