Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
You are feeling very sleeepy…
Persuasion You are feeling very sleeepy…
2
300 to 400 appeals/day from marketers alone
Bumper Stickers - “I’ll give up my gun when they pry it from my cold, dead hands.” Billboards - “Get U.S. out of the U.N.” Magazine Ads - “Think different” Television Ads - “Got Milk?” Radio Ads - “This program is brought to you by Exxon, working for a better environment” T- shirts - “No Nukes” Lawn Placards - “Vote for Kaine” Mailings, etc. 300 to 400 appeals/day from marketers alone
3
Martin Luther King, Jr.
4
National Rifle Association
5
What are attitudes? ABCs of attitudes
Affective: evaluations are based on positive and negative emotions associated with a target Behavioral: a behavioral tendency to act in a certain manner towards the attitude object Cognitive: evaluations based on beliefs & facts
6
Homer Simpson’s Attitudes Toward Beer
"Mmmmm... Gummi Beer." Homer Simpson’s Attitudes Toward Beer Affective Evaluation Beer Homer’s Attitude Toward Beer "Homer no function beer well without." Behavior Regarding Beer Cognitions Regarding Beer “To alcohol, the cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems." "The other day, I was so desperate for a beer, I snuck into the football stadium and ate the dirt under the bleachers."
7
Consistency in persuasion
Balance theory (Heider) - we are motivated to have harmony in our views and behaviors - we want to agree with people we like a disagree with those we don’t Think of someone you respect / like. What if they expressed an opinion you opposed? Could change your feelings for the person Could change your opinion on the issue
8
If you like Tiger, shouldn’t you like the car?
9
Balance Theory Balanced Situations
Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion + Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion - + Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion + - Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion - +
10
Balance Theory Imbalanced Situations
Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion - + Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion + - Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion + - Michelle Teacher Legalized abortion -
11
Consistency in persuasion
Cognitive dissonance theory - we will work to resolve inconsistencies in our beliefs and actions when they matter to us - changing a behavior can change an attitude (and vice versa) Changes in attitudes occur primarily when we perceive justification – e.g., free will in determining our (inconsistent) actions
12
Ready to turn some pegs?? Students spent hour turning pegs in holes (really boring) Paid either $1 or $20 Who enjoyed the task more (when asked later)? Why $1 people $20 was justification enough, $1 wasn’t – I must have really liked turning pegs! (Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959)
13
Insufficient justification
Attitude change happens when one freely performs an attitude-discrepant act for an inadequate reward.
14
Dissonance begins with:
Initiation Amplification Motivation Reduction Dissonance begins with: More dissonance arises when the action or decision: Dissonance is experienced as: Dissonance is reduced through: is seen as freely chosen. action or decision that conflicts w/ impt. aspect of self. Can’t be justified as due to strong reward or threat unpleasant arousal. change designed to remove the unpleasant arousal. produces negative consequences that were foreseeable cannot be withdrawn
15
What affects how consistent we are?
Arousal Tranquilizers cause people to not change their opinions Preference for consistency Consequences More impact of your behavior = more likely you will be to change your attitudes Salience of inconsistency
16
Individualist “me” focused Collectivist group focused
Consistent with what? Individualist “me” focused Collectivist group focused
17
Persuasion change in private attitude or belief as a result of receiving a message
Dual Process Model - takes into account two ways attitude change takes place - e.g., central vs. peripheral processing, systematic vs. heuristic processing, etc. Certain information is processed more deeply than other info
19
Message Persuasion Attempt Audience Factors Processing Approach
Persuasion Outcome High motivation and ability to think about the message Deep processing, focused on the quality of the message arguments. Lasting change that resists fading and counterattack Message Low motivation or ability to think about the message Superficial processing, focused on surface features, e.g.: communicator’s attractiveness or number of arguments Temporary change that that is susceptible to fading and counterattack
20
“Retirement planning can be a way to stay ahead of the game.”
Cris Carter Schwab Investor Central or Peripheral?
21
Who says... What... By what means... To whom?
Channel spoken written audio Video Communicator Credibility expertise trustworthiness Attractiveness Message content Reason vs. emotion Discrepancy One vs. two-sided Audience Need for Cognition
22
Who says? Credibility: believability
Communicator Credibility expertise trustworthiness Attractiveness Credibility: believability expertise: the amount of knowledge the source is assumed to have trustworthiness: the perceived intention of the communicator to deceive. Perceived expertise Begin by saying things the audience agrees with Be introduced as someone knowledgeable on the topic Speak confidently (no stuttering), and quickly
23
Class Demonstration Message on Phosphate containing detergents Source
Government Agency Soap Company
24
Who says? Attractiveness: having qualities that appeal to an audience
physical appeal likeability perceived similarity surface characteristics (Dembroski and others, 1978) attitudes & values Persuasive on matters of subjective preference (e.g., aspirin, soft drinks) Communicator characteristics less relevant when the subject matter is important to participants
25
Agreement with the message
Low personal relevance High personal relevance (Petty et al., 1981)
26
The Sleeper Effect (Hovland & Weiss, 1951) Time interval Expert source
% attitude change Nonexpert source Time interval (Hovland & Weiss, 1951)
27
Message content Reason vs. emotion Discrepancy One vs. two-sided What is said? Is a carefully reasoned message more persuasive, or one that arouses emotion? Will you be more persuasive by advocating an extreme point of view, or by advocating a moderate position? Should your message be one-sided, or should it acknowledge two points of view?
28
Is a carefully reasoned message more persuasive, or one that arouses emotion?
(Dabbs & Janis, 1965)
29
Fear and Persuasion
30
2. Extreme or moderate point of view?
Discrepancy interacts with communicator credibility Opinion change Discrepancy (Aronson et al., 1963)
31
3. One-sided or Two-sided
3. One-sided or Two-sided? The interaction of initial opinion with one- versus two-sidedness Opinion change The message (Hovland et al., 1949)
32
By What Means… Channel type (Chaiken & Eagly, 1978) Channel spoken
Opinion change Channel spoken written audio Video Channel type (Chaiken & Eagly, 1978)
33
Audience Need for Cognition To Whom? (Cacioppo et al., 1973)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.