1. Livelihoods, Capitals, Markets and Networks Corinne Valdivia, Elizabeth Jiménez, Jere Gilles, Porfidia Ajata, Olga Yana, Griselda Gonzales y Alejandro Romero, Lisa Rees and María Figueroa

2. The sample of the population studied: AncoraimesUmala Communities Nº% Communities Nº% Chinchaya3738,3 Karcapata1310,1San Jose Llanga9633,0 Calahuancani2313,4San Juan Circa3117,1 Cohani2718,1Vinto Copan2916,0 Chojñapata2718,1Kellhuiri2313,8 TOTAL149100,0TOTAL181100,0

3. Identifying differences in capitals between the two studied sites Capital endowments determine a household’s ability to handle shocks

4. Political Capital Livelihoods and Capitals Institutions Collective Action Policies Strategies New Knowledge & Information Human Capital Natural Capital Social Capital Economic Capital Public Capital Climate Markets SustainableLivelihoods Capabilities Produced Capital Cultural Capital Ability to Act “what people can do or be with their entitlements”

5. Financial capital: Differences on household income levels

6. Human Capital: Umala has greater human capital than Ancoraimes

7. Productive Capital: Families in Umala have more than twice the land and livestock than in Ancoraimes

8. Natural Capital: measured in terms of crop diversification

9. Social Capital: measured by individual’s participation within producer and community organizations

10. Participation in markets

11. In both sites, agricultural production is the most important source of cash income

12. The Main market outlet at both sites is the local market and the main source of information are middle man

13. Migration and income from wages outside the household

14. The second most important source of household income is wages

15. Participation in temporary employment is concentrated in vulnerable jobs

16. Masters Degree Research: The role of women’s bargaining power within the household Women’s “participation” in participatory research The impact of the adoption of new technologies on the household

17. What do these results suggest: There are substantial differences in capitals, livelihood strategies and participation in markets across the two sites studied Yet, we need to go down and examine the characteristics across communities, and Complement our analysis with qualitative information

18. Where we go from here: Assess the extent in which site differences explain household’s ability to handle risk, uncertainty and shocks Identify strategies to improve household resilience  financial products, market participation Link our analysis with biophysical indicators